1 / 18

Videoconferentie en Rechtspraak

Videoconferentie en Rechtspraak. in Nederland en Europa. Videoconferentie - Wie is Peter van Rotterdam?. Dunglish. 2005/06 - 2008/03 Proj.Mgr. Videoconferentie in de Rechtspraak 2010/10 - ??? Proj.Mgr. Transnational Videoconferencing (in judicial procedures).

marek
Télécharger la présentation

Videoconferentie en Rechtspraak

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Videoconferentieen Rechtspraak in Nederland en Europa

  2. Videoconferentie - Wie is Peter van Rotterdam? Dunglish 2005/06 - 2008/03 Proj.Mgr. Videoconferentie in de Rechtspraak 2010/10 - ??? Proj.Mgr. Transnational Videoconferencing (in judicial procedures)

  3. Videoconferentie – Wat ga ik vertellen? Regelgeving en Eisen Invoering in Nederland Stand van Zaken in NL Sharing Best Practices in Europe

  4. Videoconferentie – Regelgeving 29 828 Wijziging van het Wetboek van Strafrecht en het Wetboek van Strafvordering en enige andere wetten in verband met het gebruik van de videoconferentie in het strafrecht 20 (2000) Nr. 1 TRACTATENBLAD VAN HET K O N I N K R I J K D E R N E D E R L A N D E N 388 Wet van 16 juli 2005 tot wijziging van het Wetboek van Strafrecht en het Wetboek van Strafvordering en enige andere wetten in verband met het gebruik van de videoconferentie in het strafrecht Overeenkomst, door de Raad vastgesteld overeenkomstig artikel 34 van het Verdrag betreffende de Europese Unie, betreffende de wederzijdse rechtshulp in strafzaken tussen de lidstaten van de Europese Unie, met verklaringen; Brussel, 29 mei 2000 275 Besluit van 8 mei 2006, houdende algemene eisen ten aanzien van het horen van personen per videoconferentie (Besluit videoconferentie) 610 Besluit van 27 november 2006, houdende wijziging van het Besluit videoconferentie

  5. Videoconferentie – Wat is dat? Beeld- en Geluidsverbinding tussen 2 (of meer) lokaties Rechter, OvJ/IND, griffier (advocaat), publiek te horen persoon, tolk (advocaat)

  6. Videoconferentie – Regelgeving Voorwaarde behoud kwaliteit rechtspraak Toepassing alle zaken, maar voorlopig nog niet … Per zaak rechter besluit videoconferentie al dan niet in te zetten (advocaat heeft keuze cliënt bij te staan in rechtszaal of op locatie cliënt) Praktijk ● hoog volume, lage interactie - verlenging raadkamer gevangenhouding - vreemdelingenbewaring ● hoge kosten - rogatoire commissies

  7. Videoconferentie – Eisen vanuit de Regelgeving • In order toassure the interests of each person involved (person tobeheard, judge, lawyerandothers) the quality of image and sound shouldbesuchthateach person involvedgets a realisticandclear view on what is happening in the other (remote) location • The view shouldnotbemanipulatedby e.g. zooming in or out and/or focusing more or less on certaincharacteristics of a person • Image and sound shouldbesynchronized • Looks, facial expression, mouthmovements, direction of view, gestures, posture of each person involvedshouldbeclearlyperceptible • Other persons in the other (remote) locationshouldbevisible • Interactionsbetween persons (howtheyreact, whenthey look at and/or speaktoeachother) shouldbeclearlynoticeable • Sound shouldbe real-time, audibleandallowsimultaneousspeaking • Communication shouldbepossiblebased on sound only (e.g. whilelookingthrough files) • Objectivity: each person shouldberepresented in the same way toeachother person andeach person should have the sameperception of eye-contact withallother persons True-to-Life

  8. Videoconferentie – Eisen vanuit de Regelgeving

  9. Videoconferentie – Eisen vanuit de Regelgeving Consultation facility to consult one’slawyer (with or without interpreter’s assistance, in one or from the other remote location) nottobeheardbyothers Exchange of Documents facility to share and/or exchange documents (either hard- or softcopy, either in file or new in court session) between both locations Secure the authenticity of the reproductionshouldbeassured in thatit is indefeasible itshouldnotbepossibleto (meaningfully) intercept the reproduction Cross-Border Connectivity itshouldbepossibletoconnect the system to systems outside Netherlands; each system shouldthereforeadhereto ITU standards for ISDN, VPN, Internet and DSL

  10. Videoconferentie – Eisen vanuit de Praktijk Usability possibletouse court rooms alsofor non-videoconferencingproceedings possibletoalternatebetweenvideoconferencingand non-videoconferencingfast possibleto change videoconferencing settings between cases fast (~1 minute) reliable to use (technically stable) easy to use (not too many options / buttons)

  11. Videoconferentie – Invoering in Nederland • Tot 2005 Onderzoek • Herfst 2005 Operationalisering van Eisen • Europese Aanbesteding • Jaar 2006 Overeenkomst met Leverancier • Technische Voorbereidingen Rb Maastricht + Dboot Dordrecht • Jaar 2007 Beperkte Uitrol • - Vreemdelingenbewaring (Rb Maastricht + Dboot Dordrecht) • - Transnationaal (Rb Haarlem + HvJ Curaçao + Rb DenHaag) • Evaluatie van Praktijk Ervaringen • Begin 2008 Besluit tot Landelijke Uitrol

  12. Videoconferentie – Invoering in Nederland

  13. Videoconferentie – Stand van Zaken in Nederland 15 Rechtbanken # Zaken 3 Detentiecentra en 6 Penitentiaire Inrichtingen Almelo Amsterdam Arnhem 's-Hertogenbosch 's-Gravenhage Dordrecht Groningen Haarlem Maastricht Middelburg Roermond Rotterdam Utrecht Zutphen Zwolle >1000 vreemdelingenbewaring (groei) >100 verlenginggevangenhouding (pilot) >25/jaarrogatoirecommissies (sinds 2007) Zeist Rotterdam Zaandam Haarlem Zwaag/Hoorn Breda Amsterdam Rotterdam Haaglanden Voordelen Costs Savings (less transport, less delay) Safety (easierto keep guard over prisoners on site thanduring transport) Humanity (prisoners do notlike transport) Others (e.g. lessprobabilitytonot keep judicialterms) andit supports cross-border legal cooperation withvideoconferencing as in EU-treaty

  14. Videoconferentie – Stand van Zaken in Nederland

  15. Videoconferentie – Sharing Best Practices in Europe NL Ministry of Security and Justice together with entities from 11 member states Austria Belgium Bulgaria Czech Republic Germany Ireland Italy Latvia Malta Rumania Slovenia working on Transnational Videoconferencing – True to Life Implementation

  16. Videoconferentie – Sharing Best Practices in Europe • Now: • Agree on common ‘True-to-Life’ quality requirements • VC Studios in Belgium, Germany, CzechRepublic • Evaluation of VC Facilities in Latvia and Malta • Sharing Best Practiceswithallpartcipants • Later: • Each EU Member State has at least 2 Courts with VC facilities • At an agreed ‘True-to-Life’ quality level • To apply VC for national and transnational purposes • AndFromThere: • FurtherRoll-Out as appropriate

  17. Videoconferentie – Sharing Best Practices in Europe

  18. VRAGEN?

More Related