1 / 28

Lec 3 Sept 2 complete Chapter 1 exercises from Chapter 1 quiz # 1 Chapter 2 st

Lec 3 Sept 2 complete Chapter 1 exercises from Chapter 1 quiz # 1 Chapter 2 start. Performance Summary. Performance depends on Algorithm: affects IC, possibly CPI Programming language: affects IC, CPI Compiler: affects IC, CPI

mareo
Télécharger la présentation

Lec 3 Sept 2 complete Chapter 1 exercises from Chapter 1 quiz # 1 Chapter 2 st

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lec 3 Sept 2 • complete Chapter 1 • exercises from Chapter 1 • quiz # 1 • Chapter 2 start

  2. Performance Summary • Performance depends on • Algorithm: affects IC, possibly CPI • Programming language: affects IC, CPI • Compiler: affects IC, CPI • Instruction set architecture: affects IC, CPI, Tc The BIG Picture

  3. Exercise 1.2.1 For a color display using 8 bits for each primary color (R, G, B) per pixel and with a resolution of 1280 x 800 pixels, what should be the size (in bytes) of the frame buffer to store a frame? Each frame requires 1280 x 800 x 3 = 3072000 ~ 3 Mbytes If a computer has 3 GB memory to store such frames, how many frames can be stored? 3 x 109 / 3 x 106 ~ 1000 frames

  4. Exercise 1.3 Consider 3 processors P1, P2 and P3 with same instruction set with clock rates and CPI given below: clock rate CPI P1 2 GHz 1.5 P2 1.5 GHz 1.0 P3 3 GHz 2.5

  5. Exercise 1.3 Consider 3 processors P1, P2 and P3 with same instruction set with clock rates and CPI given below: clock rate CPI P1 2 GHz 1.5 P2 1.5 GHz 1.0 P3 3 GHz 2.5 1.3.1. Which processor has the highest performance? Suppose the program has N instructions. Time taken to execute on P1 is = 1.5 N / (2 x 109) = 0.75 N x 10-9 Time taken to execute on P2 is = N/ (1.5 x 109) = 0.66 N x 10-9 Time taken to execute on P3 is = 2.5 N/ (3 x 109) = 0.83 N x 10-9

  6. Time taken to execute on P1 is = 1.5 N / (2 x 109) = 0.75 N x 10-9 Time taken to execute on P2 is = N/ (1.5 x 109) = 0.66 N x 10-9 Time taken to execute on P3 is = 2.5 N/ (3 x 109) = 0.83 N x 10-9 P2 has the best performance (since it takes the least time to execute).

  7. Exercise 1.3 Consider 3 processors P1, P2 and P3 with same instruction set with clock rates and CPI given below: clock rate CPI P1 2 GHz 1.5 P2 1.5 GHz 1.0 P3 3 GHz 2.5 1.3.2. If the processors each execute a program in 10 seconds, find the number of cycles and the number of instructions.

  8. Exercise 1.3 Consider 3 processors P1, P2 and P3 with same instruction set with clock rates and CPI given below: clock rate CPI P1 2 GHz 1.5 P2 1.5 GHz 1.0 P3 3 GHz 2.5 1.3.2. If the processors each execute a program in 10 seconds, find the number of cycles and the number of instructions. Time taken to execute on P1 is = 1.5 N / (2 x 109) = 0.75 N1 x 10-9 = 10 So N1 = 1.33 x 1010

  9. Exercise 1.4.3 Given below are the number of instructions of a program: arith store load branch total 500 50 100 50 700 Assuming the instructions take 1, 5, 5 and 2 cycles, what is the execution time in a 2 GHz processor?

  10. Exercise 1.4.3 Given below are the number of instructions of a program: arith store load branch total 500 50 100 50 700 Assuming the instructions take 1, 5, 5 and 2 cycles, what is the execution time in a 2 GHz processor? Solution: time to execute = cycle time x CPI x no. of inst Cycle time = 1/(2 x 10-9) CPI = (500/700 + 50 x 5/700 + 100 x 5/700 + 50 x 2/700) So the total time = 675 x 10-9 sec

  11. Exercise 1.6 • Compilers have a profound impact on the performance of an application on a given processor. This problem will explore the impact compilers have on execution time:. • compiler A compiler B • no instructions exec. Time no. instructions exec. Time • 1.0 x 109 1 s 1.2 x 109 1.4 s • (b) 1.4 x 109 0.8 s 1.2 x 109 0.7 s Find the average CPI for each program given that the processor has a cycle time of 1 ns.

  12. Exercise 1.6 • Compilers have a profound impact on the performance of an application on a given processor. This problem will explore the impact compilers have on execution time:. • compiler A compiler B • no instructions exec. Time no. instructions exec. Time • 1.0 x 109 1 s 1.2 x 109 1.4 s • (b) 1.4 x 109 0.8 s 1.2 x 109 0.7 s Find the average CPI for each program given that the processor has a cycle time of 1 ns. Exec. Time = CPI x cycle time x no. of inst (a) Compiler A: CPI = 1/ (10-9 x 109 ) = 1

  13. Power Trends §1.5 The Power Wall • In CMOS IC technology ×30 5V → 1V ×1000

  14. Reducing Power • Suppose a new CPU has • 85% of capacitive load of old CPU • 15% voltage and 15% frequency reduction • The power wall • We can’t reduce voltage further • We can’t remove more heat • How else can we improve performance?

  15. Exercise 1.7 1.7.4. Given the following information about each processor, calculate its capacitive load: Processor 80286: clock rate = 12.5 MHz power = 3.3 W voltage = 5 V Solution: Use the equation power = capacitive load x voltage2 x clock rate Capacitive load = 3.3 / (5 x 5 x 12.5) x 10-6 = 0.01056 x 10-6

  16. Uniprocessor Performance §1.6 The Sea Change: The Switch to Multiprocessors Constrained by power, instruction-level parallelism, memory latency

  17. Multiprocessors General-purpose uni-cores have reached limits of historic performance scaling 􀂄 Power consumption 􀂄 Wire delays 􀂄 DRAM access latency 􀂄 Diminishing returns of more instruction-level parallelism Slide from Prof. Saman Amarasinghe

  18. Multiprocessors • Multicore microprocessors • More than one processor per chip • Requires explicitly parallel programming • Compare with instruction level parallelism • Hardware executes multiple instructions at once • Hidden from the programmer • Hard to do • Programming for performance • Load balancing • Optimizing communication and synchronization

  19. Manufacturing ICs • Yield: proportion of working dies per wafer §1.7 Real Stuff: The AMD Opteron X4

  20. Integrated Circuit Cost • Nonlinear relation to area and defect rate • Wafer cost and area are fixed • Defect rate determined by manufacturing process • Die area determined by architecture and circuit design

  21. SPEC CPU Benchmark • Programs used to measure performance • Supposedly typical of actual workload • Standard Performance Evaluation Corp (SPEC) • Develops benchmarks for CPU, I/O, Web, … • SPEC CPU2006 • Elapsed time to execute a selection of programs • Negligible I/O, so focuses on CPU performance • Normalize relative to reference machine • Summarize as geometric mean of performance ratios • CINT2006 (integer) and CFP2006 (floating-point)

  22. CINT2006 for Opteron X4 2356 High cache miss rates

  23. Amdahl’s Law s = min(p, 1/f) 1 f+(1–f)/p f = fraction unaffected p = speedup of the rest Amdahl’s law: speedup achieved if a fraction f of a task is unaffected and the remaining 1 – f part runs p times as fast.

  24. Amdahl’s Law in design Example • A processor spends 30% of its time on flp addition, 25% on flp mult, • and 10% on flp division. Evaluate the following enhancements, each • costing the same to implement: • Redesign of the flp adder to make it twice as fast. • Redesign of the flp multiplier to make it three times as fast. • Redesign the flp divider to make it 10 times as fast.

  25. Amdahl’s Law in design Example • A processor spends 30% of its time on flp addition, 25% on flp mult, • and 10% on flp division. Evaluate the following enhancements, each • costing the same to implement: • Redesign of the flp adder to make it twice as fast. • Redesign of the flp multiplier to make it three times as fast. • Redesign the flp divider to make it 10 times as fast. • Solution • Adder redesign speedup = 1 / [0.7 + 0.3 / 2] = 1.18 • Multiplier redesign speedup = 1 / [0.75 + 0.25 / 3] = 1.20 • Divider redesign speedup = 1 / [0.9 + 0.1 / 10] = 1.10 • What if both the adder and the multiplier are redesigned?

  26. Amdahl’s Law – limit to improvement • Improving an aspect of a computer and expecting a proportional improvement in overall performance §1.8 Fallacies and Pitfalls • Example: multiply accounts for 80s/100s • How much improvement in multiply performance to get 5× overall? • Can’t be done! • Corollary: make the common case fast

  27. Pitfall: MIPS as a Performance Metric • MIPS: Millions of Instructions Per Second • Doesn’t account for • Differences in ISAs between computers • Differences in complexity between instructions • CPI varies between programs on a given CPU

  28. Concluding Remarks • Cost/performance is improving • Due to underlying technology development • Hierarchical layers of abstraction • In both hardware and software • Instruction set architecture • The hardware/software interface • Execution time: the best performance measure • Power is a limiting factor • Use parallelism to improve performance §1.9 Concluding Remarks

More Related