1 / 6

NSF Case Studies: Successes and Pitfalls

NSF Case Studies: Successes and Pitfalls. Guangzhao Mao Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science College of Engineering Institute for Manufacturing Research. Outline. Typical panel process in CBET How NOT to write a GOOD proposal?

margaritae
Télécharger la présentation

NSF Case Studies: Successes and Pitfalls

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NSF Case Studies: Successes and Pitfalls Guangzhao Mao Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science College of Engineering Institute for Manufacturing Research

  2. Outline • Typical panel process in CBET • How NOT to write a GOOD proposal? • How to convert a VERY GOOD proposal into an Excellent proposal? • Recommended format by Dr. Stephen Russell

  3. Typical Panel Process in CBET • Panel makeup and proposal assignment • Fastlane review submission • Panel meeting • Proposals ranked according to submitted reviews • Discussion of top proposals • Final recommendations and panel summaries Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems (CBET)

  4. How NOT to write a GOOD proposal? • Lack of scientific underpinning/hypotheses • Incremental/work already done • Lack of supporting data • “Bait and switch”

  5. How to convert a VERY GOOD proposal into an Excellent proposal? • Example of an excellent proposal • Strong science, strong publication record, new collaboration, preliminary data, believable broader impacts • What can you do? • Milestones • Proposal framed as a series of questions and solutions • Emphasis on originality/uniqueness • Alternative hypotheses and experimental approaches

  6. Recommended format by Dr. Stephen Russell • Overview and objectives • Expected significance • Relation to PI’s longer-term goal • Background (Prior NSF support, literature review, preliminary data) • Relation to other work in progress • Experimental plan (develop each specific objective, timetable, future directions) • Broader impacts

More Related