1 / 13

Reviews for High Bandwidth Transverse Feedback LARP: 10.06.2013 LIU: 2x.07.2013 W. Hofle

Reviews for High Bandwidth Transverse Feedback LARP: 10.06.2013 LIU: 2x.07.2013 W. Hofle CERN BE-RF-FB. 12.06.2013. LARP external Review 10.06.2013 (1). Details of external review ( Fermilab , one day review) in Indico.

marged
Télécharger la présentation

Reviews for High Bandwidth Transverse Feedback LARP: 10.06.2013 LIU: 2x.07.2013 W. Hofle

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reviews for High Bandwidth Transverse Feedback LARP: 10.06.2013 LIU: 2x.07.2013 W. Hofle CERN BE-RF-FB 12.06.2013 W. Hofle @LIU Meetings 12 June 2013

  2. LARP external Review 10.06.2013 (1) Details of external review (Fermilab, one day review) in Indico • https://indico.fnal.gov/conferenceOtherViews.py?view=standard&confId=6836 • Plenary session, CERN view presented by L. Rossi (remotely) • Three parallel sessions • Magnets • Crab Cavities • Feedback project • Closeout, conclusions by external reviewers (no slides, there will be a report) 12.06.2013 W. Hofle @LIU Meetings 12 June 2013

  3. LARP external Review 10.06.2013 (2) External reviewers for Feedback: D. Teytelman(Dimtel), M. Brennan (BNL) 12.06.2013 W. Hofle @LIU Meetings 12 June 2013

  4. LARP external Review 10.06.2013 (2) 16.7 MUS$ without CERN contribution, 12.3 MUS$ with CERN contribution W. Hofle @LIU Meetings 12 June 2013

  5. CERN contributions as presented on LARP Budget Proposal • Minimum CERN contribution (4.47 M US$ in US accounting) • Kicker prototype • Pick-up • Infrastructure and Integration (cabling, interfaces LLRF/software, vacuum etc.) • Optional CERN contributions (negotiable) • Power amplifier, high power components • Spares • Diagnostics, monitoring • LARP core contribution: Signal processing 16.7 MUS$ without CERN contribution, 12.3 MUS$ with CERN contribution W. Hofle @LIU Meetings 12 June 2013

  6. CERN contributions as presented by W.H. • Accelerator Physics Support: Simulations, integration studies for implementation in SPS (optics, aperture, impedance) • Coordination, interface for potential contributions in Europe (for example kicker hardware from INF – Frascati) • Project fully integrated within LHC Injector Upgrade Project (LIU) • Engineering (FPGA and electronics development) • Pick-up design and construction • Fabrication of final system, vacuum structures, electronics • Integration of components, vacuum testing, tunnel infra-structure, cabling • Integration with Control System • Machine Developments, Commissioning W. Hofle @LIU Meetings 12 June 2013

  7. Intra-bunch Damping at Work: CERN PS Transverse Feedback PS TFB ON PS TFB ON PS TFB ON PS TFB OFF 10 ns/div 10 ns/div 10 ns/div 10 ns/div 1.4 GeV 26 GeV Challenge: Time of Flight Compensation Fully digital implementation A. Blas et al. IPAC’13, WEPME011 D. Perrelet (CERN BE-RF) W. Hofle @LIU Meetings 12 June 2013

  8. Kicker Location News – Tunnel Space in LSS3 • Short (array of) striplines, slotted wave guides, cavities ? • Location: dispersion supressor, flat vacuum chamber • Frequency reach < 1.5 GHz • Cabling / Infra-structure being prepared in LS1 (2013/2014) Low attenuation, low dispersion “smooth-wall” coax-cables 7/8” installed in May 2013 W. Hofle @LIU Meetings 12 June 2013

  9. Time-Line: SPS Implementation of vertical High Bandwidth Feedback review for phase 2: go / no-go phase 3: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 2011 2019 2013 2012 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Phase 1: demonstrator power amplifiers for phase 2 tendering (s) new pick-up design and construction kickers design and construction Phase 2: phase 2 beam tests Final implementation Phase 3: W. Hofle @LIU Meetings 12 June 2013

  10. Summary • SPS can profit from High Bandwidth Transverse Feedback in a number of ways: 25 ns and 50 ns upgrade variants (TMCI, ECI), and during scrubbing (scrubbing beam !) • Interest and potential applications in PS and LHC  SPS is also a test-bed • CERN committed to upgrade transverse feedbacks and high bandwidth transverse feedback in injectors within LIU Project frame • 2012 / 2013 Beam Tests with SLAC developed demonstrator hardware successful: Feedback loop closed with 3.2 GS/s digitization using a single bunch  confidence in digital technology • Full exploration of demonstrator with beam requires new hardware be put in place to overcome bandwidth limitations of present kicker  down selection of kicker options ongoing, infrastructure put in place for installation of new kickers as early as at end of LS1, power amplifiers • New pick-up design launched at CERN • Full bandwidth tests in SPS between LS1 and LS2 mandatory to propose such a system for LHC as well as the final implementation for the SPS W. Hofle @LIU Meetings 12 June 2013

  11. Comments and recommendations from Reviewers • Management structure, put something written in place • Schedule for LS1 critical for kicker installation • Explore synergy with BNL • Kicker impedance and beam induced power  study where it goes • Would developed kicker be compatible with PS, LHC ? • Integration with CERN LLRF (synchronisation) and CERN software needs more attention • Manpower adequate or excessive ? • Recommend to switch from evaluation boards in electronics to hardware produced by project team W. Hofle @LIU Meetings 12 June 2013

  12. Observations by W.H. • Discussion on 11T Dipole emerged, clarification will be asked from CERN • Time Line shows that decisions points ahead (HL to become fully funded project only in the future under new CERN directions, needs 6.5-7 TeV running results to make decision • In absence of full CERN commitment to HL, need for some interim agreement • Budget in US only clear for 2014, 2015, but 2015 is very difficult • Additional support on top of flat-flat funding can only come from within labs by re-directing resources (man power) to LARP activities, DOE instructed labs to do so • Will accumulate schedule shift if funds are not available in US as asked W. Hofle @LIU Meetings 12 June 2013

  13. CERN Review for Feedback Project: Status of Planning • Overview, charge of review (Wolfgang + Brennan) • Beam Parameters overview (Giovanni ? Incl. LHC ?) • Simulations (Kevin) • Optics and Aperture constraints for pick-up and Kicker (Hannes) • PU design and receiver (GerdKotzian) • Kicker Design (John Cesaratto) • Kicker and Pickup Fabrication (Eric) • Synchronisations and time of flight compensation (Daniel Valuch) • Technology choices for ADCs/DACs/FPGAs (Tom Levens) • CERN Controls (Andy ?) • SLAC / LARP contributions • INFN – LFN contributions • Close-out, recommendations W. Hofle @LIU Meetings 12 June 2013

More Related