Talking About PERMANENCY in Our Community

1. Talking About PERMANENCY in Our Community What Does the DATA Tell Us? Rock Island County

2. Who lives in Rock Island County? Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White 113,146 77.1% Black or African American 10,611 7.2% Hispanic/Latino 15,899 10.8% American Indian/Alaska Native 176 .1% Asian 3,115 2.1% Some other race 745 .5% Two or more races 3,132 2.1% Source: Rock Island County

3. How do Rock Island County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Indicated reports FY 2010 Source Number Percent of total Law enforcement 283 50% Medical 75 13% Social services 63 11% School personnel 56 10% Relative/neighbor 48 8% DCFS personnel 24 4% “Other” 19 3% Child care centers 0 0% Coroner/Medical Exam0 0% 568 100% Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 Rock Island County

4. How do Children Enter the Child Welfare System? As shown above, law enforcement was the largest source of indicated reports in County. Further, law enforcement reports overall were more likely to be indicated than reports from other major sources. - 60% of reports ( 283 reports out of 474) from law enforcement personnel were indicated in FY2010. - 43% of reports from medical sources were indicated. Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 Rock Island County

5. What Types of Harm do Children Experience? Type N indicated % of total ABUSE Substantial risk of harm 158 18% Physical abuse 60 7% Sexual abuse 32 4% Emotional abuse 9 1% NEGLECT Blatant disregard 411 48% Lack of supervision 135 16% Environmental 46 5% Lack of health 14 2% 865 100% Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 Rock Island County

6. What Types of Harm …? By far the most common harm to children is neglect/ blatant disregard for child’s welfare, representing half (48%) of all indicated reports. The second most common is abuse/substantial risk of harm (18%) and neglect/lack of supervision accounting for 16 % of indicated cases. Sexual abuse per se accounts for 4% of indicated cases (32 cases). However, when this is combined with substantial risk of sexual injury (n=41), then 9% of cases relate to sexual harm to children. Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 Rock Island County

7. Who Entered Care in 2010? In 2010, 144 children and youth entered foster care in County. Gender: female – 43% male – 57% Race: African American 38% White 57% Hispanic 03% Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 Rock Island County

8. Who is in Care? At the close of FY10, 365 children were in out-of-home care in Rock Island County. This was a slight increase from the previous year (327). - 38% of children were African American - 54% were White - 6% were Hispanic* - 2% were unknown/Asian Pacific Islander Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 & 2009. *There are on-going concerns about how Latino or Hispanic ethnicity is determined for DCFS clients. This percent is based on classification in QA data. Rock Island County

9. Who is in Care? GENDER 45% of youth are female, 55% male AGE 27% 2 or under 21% 3 - 5 18% 6 - 9 14% 10 – 13 16% 14 – 17 5% 18+ Source: DCFS QA 2010 Rock Island County

10. What are the Permanency Goals for Youth in Care?* Reunification 72% Adoption 12% Independence 11% Guardianship 4% 100% Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 *This table excludes children for whom data were missing or coded as “other” Rock Island County

11. Where are Children Placed?* - with kin (41%) • traditional foster care (38%) • institution/group care (12%) - specialized care (10%) * QA data combines foster and relative care, thus this information is from CFRC for FY09. Rock Island County

12. How was Permanency Achieved For Children in 2010? 131 children achieved permanency in FY10 Adoption 13% Reunification 68% Subsidized Guardianship 19% Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 Rock Island County

13. How have Permanency Rates Changed over Time? Source: CFRC 2009 Rock Island County

14. How have 24 Month Permanency Rates Changed Over Time? Source: CFRC 2009 Rock Island County

15. What are the Permanency Trends in our County? Over the last 5 years, Rock Island County has seen fluctuation in 12 month permanency – from a high of 45% for those entering care in 2005 to a low of 27% for those entering in 2006. For most recent data available, 30% of children who entered care in 2008 achieved permanency in 12 months. 24 month permanency has fluctuated from 78% for those entering in 2004 to 46% entering in 2009. The most recent data (those entering care in 2007) show 49% achieving 24 month permanency. Source: CFRC 2009. [Such data are not yet available from QA] Rock Island County

16. Disproportionality and Disparity in our County Disproportionality is when the percentage of a group of children in a population is different from the percentage of the same group in the child welfare system. For example, if 25% of the children in a county were African American, then 25% of those in foster care should be African American, all things being equal. That would be proportional. If these percents differ there is disproportionality. Disparity is unequal treatment or outcomes when comparing children of color to non-minority children. For example, if Hispanic children are less likely to achieve permanency than white children then there are disparate outcomes by race/ethnicity. Rock Island County

17. Is There Disproportionality in Our County? YES African American children continue to be overrepresented among children in care in our County. 10% of the child population is African American, compared to 39% of those in care. 69% of the child population is White, compared to 55% of those in care. 21% of the child population is Hispanic, compared to 6% of those in care This overrepresentation has been the case for many years. Source: 2009 population data come from CFRC, 2010 placement data from QA Rock Island County

18. Disproportionality Rock Island County

19. Disproportionality Over Time Rock Island County

20. Are There Differences in Permanency Goals by Race?* NO African American White . Reunification 84 72% 119 73% Adoption 15 13% 22 14% Guardianship 6 5% 5 3% Independence 1210%1610% 117 100% 162 100% *This table excludes children for whom permanency goals were missing or coded as “other”. • Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 Rock Island County

21. Is There Disparity in Permanency Achievement? YES In FY10, 121African American children and White children achieved permanency. African American children and White children who were in care in FY10 left care at different rates, with White children muchmore likely to leave care than African American children (White 46% & African American 21%) White youth were somewhat more likely than African American youth to exit via reunification (68% vs 63%) African American youth were more likely than White youth to exit via adoption (20% vs 11%) Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 Rock Island County

22. Is There Disparity in Permanency Achievement Over Time? Rock Island County

23. Is There Disparity in Permanency Achievement Over Time? Rock Island County

24. What is the “Bottom Line” on Disproportionality? Are African American children more likely to be reported as neglected / abused than White children in County? YES Although African American children are just 10% of the population, they comprise 26% of the reported cases. White children comprise 69% of the child population but 65% of those reported. Hispanic children represent 21% of the population but just 6% of those reported. Source: CFRC 09 (for population data) QA FY10 (for report data) Rock Island County

25. What is the “Bottom Line” on Disproportionality? Once reported, are African American children more likely to be indicated than White children? YES In FY10 of all reports for African American children, 43% were indicated. Of all reports for White children, 32% were indicated. Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 Rock Island County

26. What is the “Bottom Line” on Disparity? Once indicated do African American and White children enter care at similar rates? NO In FY10, African American children were slightly more likely to enter care. 22% of African American children of those indicated entered care 17% of White children of those indicated entered care Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 Rock Island County

27. Disparity Are African American children less likely to have reunification as a goal than White children? NO In FY10, 72% of African American children have a goal of reunification compared to 73% of White children. Are African American children less likely to exit care than White children? YES In FY10 21% of African American children in care achieved permanency compared to 46% of White children. Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 Rock Island County

28. Disparity Did African American children achieve permanency differently from White children in FY10? YES In FY10, African American children were slightly less likely than White children to achieve permanency through reunification (63% & 68%). African American children were more likely to exit care through adoption (20% to 11%) Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 Rock Island County

29. Disproportionality and Disparity: The Summary African American children are more likely to be reported than White children. When reported, African American children are more likely to be indicatedthan White children. When indicated, African American children are slightly more likely to enter care than white children. Once in care, African American children tend to achieve 12 and 24 month permanency at similar rates. However, in FY 10 African American children were much less likely to achieve permanency than were White children. Rock Island County

30. On-goingQuestions for our Area Rock Island County