1 / 35

802.22 EC Closing Motions Package

802.22 EC Closing Motions Package. Date: 2013-11-15. Authors:. Formation of the Spectrum Occupancy Sensing (SOS) Study Group under the 802.22 WG. Summary and Motivation .

mariah
Télécharger la présentation

802.22 EC Closing Motions Package

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 802.22 EC Closing Motions Package • Date:2013-11-15 Authors: Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  2. Formation of the Spectrum Occupancy Sensing (SOS) Study Group under the 802.22 WG Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  3. Summary and Motivation • Administrations all over the world are looking to improve the utilization of the spectrum. White Space Database access is one of the techniques to enable spectrum sharing and the use of unused frequency bands also known as the White Spaces. • However, in many administrations, locations and characteristics of the radiators are not well documented. Individual and collaborative spectrum sensing is one of the tools to complement the information contained in databases to create an accurate spectrum occupancy survey. • Such a Spectrum Occupancy Sensing (SOS) system will combine information from multiple sensors along with local terrain information to predict the spectrum occupancy patterns. • This could lead to more efficient use of spectrum especially in places where the information about the primary users is difficult to find. • The SOS Study Group will explore on-going research, challenges and aspects that require standardization. Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  4. Relevance to the IEEE 802.22 WG • 802.22 supports sensing, beaconing and database access to enable cognitive sharing • 802.22 has defined the MAC messaging formats to transfer sensing information from Customer Premises Equipment (CPEs) to the Base Station 802.22 Protocol Reference Model Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  5. Spectrum Occupancy Sensing (SOS) System • SOS will bring the Spectrum Sensing Functions (SSF) and sensing related messaging formats out of the current 802.22 spec to create a stand-alone system of external sensors dedicated to creating a Spectrum Occupancy Survey. Spectrum Occupancy Sensing Spectrum Sensing Function (1) Spectrum Sensing Function (N) Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  6. Timelines of the Study Group 2013 Nov 2014 MARCH 2014 JULY .. STUDY GROUP FORMED OUTREACH TO OTHER SIMILAR ACTIVITIES DEVELOP PAR AND 5C PAR AND 5C APPROVED BY THE EC SOS ACTIVITY BEGINS Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  7. 802.22 Working Group Motion for the Approval of the SOS Study Group Move to approve the launch of the Spectrum Occupancy Sensing (SOS) Standardization Study Group under the IEEE 802.22 working group Move: Peter Flynn Second: Jerry Kalke For: 11 Against: 0 Abstain: 0 Motion passes Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  8. EC Motion for the Approval of the SOS Study Group IEEE 802 EC approves the launch of the Spectrum Occupancy Sensing (SOS) Standardization Study Group under the IEEE 802.22 working group Move: Second: For: Against: Abstain: Motion Passes / Fails Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  9. Motion to Forward P802.22a (Amendment on MIBs and Management Plane Procedures) to RevCom Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  10. Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems Motion for an Approval to forward the IEEE P802.22ato the IEEE SA RevCom Number of People in the Sponsor Ballot Pool = 78 Slide 10

  11. Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems Working Group Motion to forward the IEEE P802.22ato the IEEE SA RevCom IEEE 802.22 working group authorizes the working group chair to seek approval from the IEEE 802 Excutive Committee to forward P802.22a/D2.0 to IEEE SA REVCOM. Move: Tom Gurley Second: : Jerry Kalke For: 11 Against: 0 Abstain: 0 Motion passes. Slide 11

  12. Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems EC Motion to forward the IEEE P802.22ato the IEEE SA RevCom IEEE 802 Executive Committee authorizes to forward P802.22a/D2.0 to IEEE SA REVCOM. Move: Second: : For: Against: Abstain: Motion passes / Fails Slide 12

  13. Motion to Approve the 802.22 Revision PAR Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  14. Comments Received on the 802.22 Revision PAR Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  15. Summary • 802.22 General Comments • The 802.22 WG submitted the initial revision PAR as contained in document [22-13-0138Rev2] on October 10th 2013 • A corrected PAR document was sent out on October 11th 2013 [22-13-0138Rev3] • 5C [22-13-0156Rev0] document was sent out on Nov 1st as per the instructions from the Chair of the 802 EC • We considered the comments from the various working groups and here is the summary of our response. Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  16. Summary • 802.22 General Comments • Since 2005, when the 802.22 PAR was first submitted and approved, FCC, NTIA and other regulators have broadened their horizons for cooperative spectrum sharing approaches in order to optimize spectrum utilization. [For example see the PCAST Report - Realizing Full Potential of Government Held Spectrum] • FCC/ NTIA are in the process of opening new spectrum bands which specifically require multi-levels of regulated users to share the spectrum utilizing cognitive radio behavior. For our purposes, we defined spectrum sharing as a mechanism which ensures that licensed services are protected from interference while retaining flexibility for other devices to share spectrum with new services or to change frequencies • While these new bands have been specified by the FCC for the United States, they may be different in other countries. • The intention of this PAR is to align the current 802.22 technology with emerging regulations. Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  17. Summary • 802.22 General Comments (continued) • White Space database implementers are looking to leverage their existing TV Band solutions into these new bands where interfaces to the devices are likely to remain the same as defined for the TV Bands • Wireless device manufacturers are seeking a common protocol to be used across these shared spectrum bands. • The aim is not to change the 802.22 protocol (PHY and MAC) but to change the spectrum management framework to align 802.22 to be used in these other bands. For example, 802.22 may be used in the proposed Federal radar bands (e. g. 2700 MHz – 3650 MHz) which allow spectrum sharing, since 802.22 already contains the basic cognitive radio capabilities and mechanisms that are needed to enable spectrum sharing Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  18. Comments from 802.19 • IEEE 802.22 Revision • Since Gerald Chouinard is no longer the vice chair of the working group Section 3.1 of the PAR should be updated with the current vice chair. • ANS: ACCEPT • In the Purpose section it says that a new clause will be added.  This sounds a bit like an amendment.  Is there a reason a 5C was not provided for this new clause? • ANS: The primary purpose of the revision is to merge the amendments (P802.22a and P802.22b) as well as make the necessary corrections. The new clause is likely to be a recommendation on how 802.22 may be used in other shared spectrum bands which may have rules that are similar to the ones defined in the TV Bands but there may be some additional nuances. So it was interpreted that the 5C may not be required. However, when the 802 EC Chair requested a 5C it was promptly provided on November 1st Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  19. Comments from 802.11 • 2.1 spell out the first use of RAN • ANS: ACCEPT • 3.1 Update the WG Vice chair • ANS: ACCEPT • 5.2 the scope is not describing what band is truly being used. “any band” is too broad a scope. • ANS: • Since 2005, when the 802.22 PAR was first submitted and approved, FCC, NTIA and other regulators have broadened their horizons for cooperative spectrum sharing approaches in order to optimize spectrum utilization. [For example see the PCAST Report - Realizing Full Potential of Government Held Spectrum] • FCC/ NTIA are in the process of opening new spectrum bands which specifically require multi-levels of regulated users with spectrum sharing and cognitive radio behavior. • While these new bands have been specified by the FCC for the United States, they may be different in other countries. • The aim is not to change the 802.22 protocol (PHY and MAC) but to change the spectrum management framework to align 802.22 to be used in these other bands. For example, 802.22 may be used in the proposed Federal radar bands (e. g. 2700 MHz – 3650 MHz) which require spectrum sharing, since 802.22 already contains the basic cognitive radio capabilities and mechanisms that are needed to enable spectrum sharing Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  20. Comments from 802.11 • 5.4 the added sentences of “This Revision project…” is not being added in the right place. This should be part of 5.5 Need for the project. (see slide notes for all the text that should be moved to 5.5.) • Ans: ACCEPT • 5.5 the initial part of this section seems to be why the 802.22 was originally started, and that would not necessarily be the reason for the revision, but only the latter part of this section should be used (Why are you doing the revision not why 802.22.) • Ans: ACCEPT Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  21. Comments from 802.11 • 5.2 Is the scope of the revision only to reband the existing 802.22 radio? • ANS: The aim is not to change the 802.22 protocol (PHY and MAC) but to provide a spectrum management framework to align 802.22 to be used in these other bands. For example, 802.22 may be used in the proposed United States Federal radar bands (e. g. 2700 MHz – 3650 MHz) which require spectrum sharing, since 802.22 already contains the basic cognitive radio capabilities and mechanisms that are needed to enable spectrum sharing • 5.2 Which bands do you intend to occupy? (this should be stated in the Scope statement) All Unlicensed Spectrum is not a reasonable response. A specific range of bands should be specified. • ANS: That is correct. 802.22 is unlikely to be used in an Unlicensed band such as the ISM bands. However, due its cognitive radio capabilities, 802.22 is highly suitable to bands that require spectrum sharing with other primary users. As specified earlier, such bands may include 2700 MHz – 3650 MHz in the United States where sharing with radar systems may be allowed. Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  22. Comments from 802.11 • 7.1 What about 802.16? If you are expanding the bands and the type of station definition, does this become similar to 802.16? • ANS: Counter to 802.16, the fundamental assumption behind the operation of IEEE 802.22 systems is that spectrum is shared with primary users. Hence the shared spectrum may or may not be available at all times and at all the locations. The radio will have to automatically change its characteristics and behavior to operate in appropriate alternate spectrum as directed by the cognitive sharing mechanism (e. g. database, sensing or beaconing). Hence 802.22 is highly applicable for use in bands that require spectrum sharing such TV Bands or in the newly available radar bands in the United States between 2700 MHz to 3650 MHz. • 8.1 No section number with the text, and it seems to be a cut and paste error as it is identical to the purpose statement. Delete. • Ans: ACCEPT Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  23. Comments from 802.11 • General: Missing updated 5C – see 10.2 and 10.3 of the LMSC OM – This Project is not qualified to be considered at this Session. • ANS: The primary purpose of the revision is to merge the amendments (P802.22a and P802.22b) as well as make the necessary corrections. The new clause is likely to be a recommendation on how 802.22 may be used in other shared spectrum bands which may have rules that are similar to the ones defined in the TV Bands. So it was interpreted that the 5C may not be required. However, when the 802 EC Chair requested a 5C it was promptly provided on November 1st • General: the PAR form presented is not the correct PAR form. An old PAR form should not be used for consideration. • ANS: This PAR form was generated by the IEEE myProject so we are not aware if the form automatically generated by the tool is an old PAR form or a new PAR form. Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  24. Comments from 802.16 • The IEEE 802.16 Working Group has reviewed the draft P802.22 PAR Revision • <https://mentor.ieee.org/802.22/dcn/13/22-13-0138-03-0000-802-22-revision-par.pdf> and offers the following comment. • The Scope, per the draft PAR revision, is: • This standard specifies the air interface, including the cognitive radio medium access control layer (MAC) and physical layer (PHY), of point-to-multipoint and point-to-point wireless regional area networks comprised of a professional fixed base station with fixed and portable user terminals operating in the bands that allow spectrum sharing such as VHF/UHF TV broadcast bands between 54 MHz to 862 MHz. Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  25. Comments from 802.16 • We note the proposed addition of the term “point-to-point” to the scope, implying the draft standard will specify an air interface of point-to-point in addition to point-to-multipoint wireless regional area networks. To the extent that a point-to-multipoint system can be considered a point-to-point system when a fixed base station communicates with a single user terminal, this additional “point-to-point” text is superfluous since the capability is already included in the existing 802.22 standard. Alternatively, if the intention of this PAR revision is to broaden the PAR scope (for example, to include an air interface between a pair of base stations or a pair of user terminals), this would be a major change in the scope of the existing standard and would require full justification through a Five Criteria statement. However, the Five Criteria statement circulated on 1 November does not provide details justifying such a broadening of scope. We propose to remove the term “point-to-point” from the PAR revision, since there is currently no restriction on the application of a point-to-multipoint system with only a single user terminal communicating with a fixed base station in the 802.22 standard. • ANS: ACCEPT – Removed the term Point-to-Point from the Scope Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  26. Comments from 802.16 • We are also concerned about the proposed text “bands that allow spectrum sharing such as” to the modified scope (noting that the word “allow” was not used in the draft PAR revision 02 that was reviewed by many EC members and dramatically alters the meaning of the scope). To our understanding some form of spectrum sharing is allowed in virtually all wireless bands, including licensed bands. Thus, the proposal would expand the scope of the standard from cognitive radio networks to radio networks applicable to any spectrum sharing method in any known band, including bands in which spectrum sharing is allowed but not normally used. Such a significant change of scope would need to be supported by an analysis in an accompanying Five Criteria statement addressing the expansion to all possible spectrum sharing methods. We propose to limit the expansion of the scope to bands requiring cognitive radio solutions. • ANS: Please see the next page ….. Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  27. Comments from 802.16 • Continued from the earlier page …. • ANS: The PAR document with the words “allow” was circulated as a correction via e-mail that was sent out on October 11th [22-13-0138Rev2]. However, we are okay with changing the word “that Allow Spectrum Sharing” to “that Allow Spectrum Sharing between Primary Services and Opportunistic Communication Devices” • The fundamental assumption behind the operation of IEEE 802.22 systems is that spectrum is shared with primary users. Hence the shared spectrum may or may not be available at all times and at all the locations. The radio will have to automatically change its characteristics and behavior to operate in appropriate alternate spectrum as directed by the cognitive sharing mechanism (e. g. database, sensing or beaconing). Hence 802.22 is highly applicable for use in bands that allow or require spectrum sharing such as the radar bands between 2700 MHz to 3650 MHz in the United States. Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  28. Further Comments Received on the 802.22 Revision PAR Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

  29. From 802.22 • See 22-13/168r0 for comments: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.22/dcn/13/22-13-0168-00-0000-802-22-response-to-the-comments-on-the-802-22-revision-par.pptx • Updated PAR: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.22/dcn/13/22-13-0138-04-0000-802-22-revision-par.docx • Updated 5c: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.22/dcn/13/22-13-0156-01-0000-802-22-revision-par-5c.docx Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  30. 802.22 Rebuttal with Responses • The change of adding “such as” made the scope non-definitive. If the scope clause had left out the “such as” phrase then the scope would be bounded and we could tell what new bands were being added. • Ans: Noted. Thanks for the possible remedies • The Addition of “between primary services and opportunistic communications devices” phrase is also problematic for us. • Ans: Noted. However, this de-lineates 802.22 as a technology that is focused more on cognitive radio based operation. • Option 1: Just do a roll-up and do the additional bands as a separate project (amendment). • Ans: We prefer to go with Option 2 Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  31. 802.22 rebuttal Scope suggestion • Option 2: Change the Scope statement to be definitive: • This standard specifies the air interface, including the cognitive radio medium access control layer (MAC) and physical layer (PHY), of point-to-multipoint and point-to-point wireless regional area networks comprised of a professional fixed base station with fixed and portable user terminals operating in the bands between 1300 MHz to 1750 MHz and 2700 MHz to 3650 MHz, and the VHF/UHF TV broadcast bands between 54 MHz to 862 MHz. • ANS: Thanks for the remedy. We agree. Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  32. 802.22 rebuttal • Note from the NesCom Conventions: • PARs for the Revision of a Standard All PARs for the revision of a standard shall include an indication under "Additional Explanatory Notes" of the PAR form to identify PAR elements (e.g., scope, purpose, need, etc.) that have been modified. • 8.1 does not have that included, but rather has a cut and paste from the need…in our original comment, you indicated you would accept removal of the extranous material, but you still need to add the required information. • ANS: This was overlooked when the response PAR with changes was sent out. We have corrected that. Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  33. 802.22 Working Group Motion Authorizing the 802.22 Revision PAR Form Move to approve the contents of the document:22-13-0138Rev4 (802.22 Revision PAR)https://mentor.ieee.org/802.22/dcn/13/22-13-0138-04-0000-802-22-revision-par.docx as the contents of the P802.22 Revision PAR, and the contents of the document:22-13-0156Rev1 (802.22 Revision PAR 5C) https://mentor.ieee.org/802.22/dcn/13/22-13-0156-01-0000-802-22-revision-par-5c.docxas the contents of the P802.22 Revision PAR 5C, to be forwarded to the IEEE 802 EC. To allow the Chair to make a motion during the Closing EC Meeting seeking approval to submit the PAR form to IEEE SA NESCOM. To allow the Chair to make subsequent submission of the PAR form to the IEEE SA NESCOM upon its approval from the EC. To allow the Chair to make the necessary changes to the PAR form at his discretion based on the comments from IEEE 802 EC or the IEEE SA NESCOM members and submit the revised PAR to the NESCOM. Move: Chang-woo Pyo Second: Peter Flynn For: 11 Against: 0 Abstain: 0 Motion passes. Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  34. EC Motion Authorizing the 802.22 Revision PAR Form to be Forwarded to NESCOM EC Approves the 802.22 Revision PAR Form as contained in Document 22-13-0138 Rev 5[], and allows the PAR Form to be forwarded to the IEEE SA NESCOM Move: Second: For: Against: Abstain: Motion passes/ Fails Jon Rosdahl, CSR

  35. References • 802.22 November Plenary Working Group Motions - https://mentor.ieee.org/802.22/dcn/13/22-13-0170-01-0000-802-22-wg-motions-at-nov-2013-plenary.docx • 802.22 Revision PAR Documents – • PAR Forms: The 802.22 WG submitted the initial revision PAR as contained in document [22-13-0138Rev2] on October 10th 2013 • A corrected PAR document was sent out on October 11th 2013 [22-13-0138Rev3] • 5C [22-13-0156Rev0] document was sent out on Nov 1st as per the instructions from the Chair of the 802 EC • Revisions to the PAR Form based on the comments received from 802.11, 802.19 and 802.16 Working Groups [22-13-0138Rev4] • Revisions to the 5C based on the comments received from 802.11 WG [22-13-0156Rev1] • Revisions based on the new re-buttal comments from the 802.11 Working Group [22-13-0138Rev5] Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

More Related