Solving Triclinic or Monoclinic Ni-Complex Structure: Data Analysis Tools in PLATON
300 likes | 400 Vues
Explore the debate between triclinic and monoclinic models for a Ni-complex through data analysis in PLATON. Learn about the challenges, tools available, refinement results, and proposed solutions. This example from Bruker User Meeting offers valuable insights into crystallography analysis.
Solving Triclinic or Monoclinic Ni-Complex Structure: Data Analysis Tools in PLATON
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Reflection Data Analysis Tools in PLATON Problem from Bruker Discussion List: Triclinic or Monoclinic? Ni-complex In P-1,Z'=2: a = 11.869 b = 5.562 c = 13.67 Alpha = 90.08 Beta = 116.38 Gamma = 90.06 R1 = 10% WR2 = 31% Ton Spek, Utrecht University, The Netherlands Bruker User Meeting Bad Herrenalb, Sept. 23, 2012
Triclinic, Monoclinic ? • The New SHELXT program offers a starting model in P-1 andPnand P21/n • PLATON/ADDSYM happily offers a structure in P21/n that resembles the solution in P-1
Alternative Monoclinic Model In P21/n, Z'=1: A = 11.869 B = 5.562 C = 13.67 Alpha = 90 Beta = 116.38 Gamma = 90 R1 = 17% WR2 = 53% Poor ADP's
- Investigate thePrimary Data - Images, Integration - HKL File - Redundancy, Laue Symmetry (Rav) - Space Group Extinctions - Investigate the Refinement Data - Analysis of Variance - Twinning With Tools Available in PLATON Looking at the Data
Refined Model in P-1 All H-atoms Found and rerined
In Conclusion • Three additional parameters had to be introduced to obtain a nice looking refinement result in P-1: • - A twinning parameter • - Two population parameters Ni1 0.88, Ni2 0.43 • The residual problem: explain the non 1.0 population parameters for Ni. • - Go back to the chemist …..
Example taken from the very active and interesting Bruker User Discussion List Maintained by Ilia Guzai Problem and data communicated by Babu Varghese Thanks !