1 / 15

Illegal Music Downloading among college students

Illegal Music Downloading among college students. A Qualitative, Quantitative and Experimental Study By Brian Sheehan, James Tsao, Ed Russell Syracuse University, S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications. What We Did. Qualitative Study: Summer 2008

marja
Télécharger la présentation

Illegal Music Downloading among college students

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Illegal Music Downloading among college students A Qualitative, Quantitative and Experimental Study By Brian Sheehan, James Tsao, Ed Russell Syracuse University, S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications

  2. What We Did Qualitative Study: Summer 2008 • Four focus groups at Syracuse University • 15 individual interviews • Data analyzed: Scissors and Sort Technique • Cognitive map development

  3. What we did Quantitative Study: Winter 2009 • 204 surveys at Syracuse University • 153 samples analyzed • Multiple regression analysis

  4. Findings

  5. Motivations • Primary Motivations: Economic, Collection, Social • Surprising order of gratifications contribution: Social, Collection, Economic • Would looking at it from a fundamentally social POV change communications approaches?

  6. Costs and Reinforcements • Costs: Search costs and Technical costs (i.e., viruses) statistically related. Legal costs (e.g., fines) not. • Reinforcements: Optimistic bias, Anti-industry/Musician bias, Social acceptance and Moral conscience all statistically related. • Social acceptance skews Moral conscience.

  7. Model Reinforcements Moral Conscience (-)** Anti musicians (-)** Social Acceptance (+)** Optimistic Bias (+)** Motivations Social (+)** Collection (+)** Economic (+)* Gratifications of Digital Music Piracy Perceived Costs Search (+) * Legal (-) (ns) Technical (+) * * P< .05; ** P< .001 “+”: A positive relationship between the two variables. “-”: An inverse relationship between the two variables. “NS”: there is no relationship between the two variables.

  8. Promising Communications Areas • Individual messages that have emotional social aspects • Future Dreams • Embarrassment • Reputation • The power of one (song)

  9. Phase III • Communications Concept Testing • Controls: Prosecution/Feel Lucky, Virus, Hurt artists • New: Your future/Your dreams, The band you love/that song (Inconvenient Truth), Social virus, Your reputation • Hybrid: Stealing Embarrassment

  10. Experimentation • Experimental groups • Control group

  11. Time frame • Experiment: Fall 2009 • Data analysis: Winter 2009-Spring 2010 • Report: March 2010

  12. Collaboration • Teaching • Advertising campaign to be developed by Newhouse students. • Collaboration • Continued collaboration with RIAA • Involvement with/introduction to Joint Committee of the Higher Education and Entertainment Communities Technology Task Force? • Outreach • Co-sponsor national conference/symposium in Syracuse University focusing on music digital piracy issues

  13. Proposed Budget

More Related