1 / 32

Routability Driven White Space Allocation for Fixed-Die Standard-Cell Placement

Routability Driven White Space Allocation for Fixed-Die Standard-Cell Placement. Xiaojian Yang Bo-Kyung Choi Majid Sarrafzadeh Embedded and Reconfigurable Lab Computer Science Department, UCLA. Outline. Motivation and Previous Work White Space Allocation Approach

markle
Télécharger la présentation

Routability Driven White Space Allocation for Fixed-Die Standard-Cell Placement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Routability Driven White Space Allocation for Fixed-Die Standard-Cell Placement Xiaojian Yang Bo-Kyung Choi Majid Sarrafzadeh Embedded and Reconfigurable Lab Computer Science Department, UCLA 1

  2. Outline • Motivation and Previous Work • White Space Allocation Approach • Placement with White Space • Experimental Results • Conclusion 2

  3. Motivation • Fixed-die Placement with White Space • Wirelength or Routability? Tight Placement Loose Placement Better for Wirelength/Timing Better for Routability 3

  4. Different White Space Distribution Dragon’s result without white space, Shortest Wirelength (498) unroutable 4

  5. Different White Space Distribution Dragon’s result with uniform white space, Short Wirelength (509) unroutable 5

  6. Different White Space Distribution QPlace’s result, Wirelength = 589 routable 6

  7. Different White Space Distribution Dragon’s result with congestion-driven allocation, Wirelength = 573 routable 7

  8. Previous Work • Parakh, Brown, Sakallah, “Congestion Driven Quadratic Placement”, DAC 1998 • Caldwell, Kahng, Markov, “Can Recursive Bisection Alone Produce Routable Placements?”, DAC 2000 • Industrial Placement Tools 8

  9. Our Contribution • Fast and effective white space allocation approach which does not affect the running time of the placement process • Aggressively allocating white space to maximize the effect of alleviating congestion • A study on wirelength optimization considering white space 9

  10. Allocation in Top-Down Placement • We allocate white space at finer placement level, because we have more accurate congestion map. Final Placement Allocate white Space here 10

  11. Global Placement w/o White Space 0% white space 11

  12. White Space Allocation Process Step 1: Global Placement Bins Cells White Space 13% white space 12

  13. White Space Allocation Process Step 2: Congestion Estimation 13% white space 13

  14. White Space Allocation Process Step 2: Congestion Estimation 13% white space 14

  15. White Space Allocation Process Step 3: Allocating white space 13% white space 15

  16. White Space Allocation Process Step 4: Moving cells to match the white space 13% white space 16

  17. White Space Allocation Process Step 5: Wirelength Optimization with white space 13% white space 17

  18. White Space Allocation Process Step 6: Second allocation and detailed placement 13% white space 18

  19. Allocation Based on Congestion • Congestion estimation for each bin • Cheng ICCAD’94 • Lou et al. ISPD’01 • Yang, Kastner, Sarrafzadeh ICCAD’01 • White spaces are allocated into bins according to bin congestion • First assign white space into rows, then bins 19

  20. White Space Allocation 20

  21. Aggressive Allocation • Tight placement for non-congested area, loose placement for congested area. • Depends on: • Congestion cost function • Allocation strategy Non-aggressive Aggressive 21

  22. Post Allocation Optimization • Improving wirelength using simulated annealing • Cells are swapped between bins • White spaces of bins are reserved • Variable bin width • Keep row balance in annealing: total cell width plus total white space in each row is balanced 22

  23. Experimental Setup Cadence QPlace Placed DEF IBM-PLACE2 Capo MetaPlacer Cadence WRoute LEF/DEF Dragon (Fixed-die) Allocation algorithm has been incorporated into Dragon 23

  24. Benchmarks (IBM-PLACE 2.0) • Converted from ISPD98 partitioning net-lists • New features for IBM-PLACE 2.0: • LEF/DEF and GSRC bookshelf format • Cell sizes are similar with the standard-cells in TSMC 0.18um library (from Artisan Inc.) • Aspect ratio 1.0 (arbitrary number of rows) • No space between rows • Over-the-cell routing with 4 or 5 routing layers • Exact pin locations (not center-of-cell) • Predefined core size with white space 5%-15% • Each circuit corresponds to an easy and a hard instance • Limitations • No clock/power/ground signals • No pin input/output information • No I/O pads connections 24

  25. Experimental Results Summary: Successful Finished with violations Failed 25

  26. Wirelength Comparison Overall Dragon’s results are 8.8% shorter than QPlace’s 26

  27. Runtime Comparison • Placement time: Dragon is 10-15 times slower than QPlace • Good placements significantly reduce routing time: Dragon’s placements get up to 3x speedup in routing compared with QPlace’s (on average 21% saving) • Total Place/Route time: Dragon takes 0.4-3.2 times of QPlace’s cost. (In most cases 1.5-2.5) 27

  28. Different White Space Distribution QPlace’s result, Wirelength = 590 routable 28

  29. Different White Space Distribution Dragon’s result with congestion-driven allocation, Wirelength = 579 routable 29

  30. Different White Space Distribution Capo/MetaPlacer’s result, Wirelength = 563 unroutable 30

  31. Congestion and White Space congestion map before allocation white space map for the final placement 31

  32. Conclusion & Future Work • Congestion aware white space allocation improves routability • Aggressively allocating white space helps routing in hard cases • Open problem: multiple objectives during placement 32

More Related