1 / 60

Indiana Quality Improvement

Indiana Quality Improvement. Solving Problems, Elevating Quality in Public Health QI Coach’s Handbook. QI Coach Coordinators. Contact Information: Sue Hancock 317-234-1648 shancock@isdh.in.gov Sarah Strawbridge 317-233-7371 sstrawbridge@isdh.in.gov. Module 1. QI Basics. Why QI?.

marnie
Télécharger la présentation

Indiana Quality Improvement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Indiana Quality Improvement Solving Problems, Elevating Quality in Public Health QI Coach’s Handbook

  2. QI Coach Coordinators • Contact Information: • Sue Hancock • 317-234-1648 • shancock@isdh.in.gov • Sarah Strawbridge • 317-233-7371 • sstrawbridge@isdh.in.gov

  3. Module 1 QI Basics

  4. Why QI? • The goals are to benefit: • Employees involved in work processes, making the work easier. • Our organization, through more efficient or effective work activities. • The customers of our work, who must use what we produce. Kelly, 1992

  5. Where did QI come from? • Grandfather of QI: W. Edwards Deming • Statistician and professor by trade, consulted with American companies during WW II on production issues. • Post world-war II: Worked with Japanese companies to rebuild. They embraced his techniques. • Believed that the goal of business should not be just to make profits, but to stay in business so they could provide jobs.

  6. W Edwards Deming • Has been called a “curmudgeon” for his critical workshop tactics. • In reality, he sympathized with the plight of workers. • A short story… • Deming’s 14 Points

  7. QI Assumptions • Workers want to perform well on the job, take pride in their work. • Workers’ performance more often related to faulty systems than employee error. • Jurran’s Principle: “85%-15% Rule” • Management/leadership generally makes decisions about systems. • Data is needed to make good system decisions.

  8. What do we get from QI? • Improves our job satisfaction – we know our product or service is quality, a source of pride. • Reinforces the belief that we can solve problems, make a difference in our jobs • We have a greater investment, ownership for our work. • We have less tolerance for problems and poor quality.

  9. QI Basics Improving quality is a systematic process: • PLAN: Define the problem, collect data, select a possible solution. • DO: Implement solution on a small scale. • CHECK: Collect data, determine if the solution worked. If not, go back to Plan and select another solution. • ACT: When a solution works, spread to all aspects of the operation.

  10. Five-Step Problem Solving Model Quality improvement can also be described as a systematic problem-solving model: 1. Identify the problem – clearly state what needs improvement. 2. Analyze the problem – Determine what causes problem to occur. 3. Evaluate alternatives – Identify and select actions to reduce or eliminate the problem. 4. Test/implement a solution – Implement these actions on a trial basis to determine effectiveness. 5. Standardize – Ensure that useful actions are preserved.

  11. Module 2 Working Together as a Team

  12. Working Together as a Team • Team Roles: • Team members share their expertise to plan and implement project work. • The Leader orchestrates team activities, maintains records, serves as communication link with rest of the organization. • The Coach understands the tools and concepts of improvement, including approaches that help a team function well together. • The Sponsor reviews and supports team efforts, interfaces with other parts of the organization.

  13. Effective Team Members… • Participate fully in team meetings • Share knowledge and experience, listen closely to that of other team members • Are open to new ideas • Carry out assignments between meetings • Assist leader with managing the meetings, e.g. documentation, discussions. • Communicate effectively with colleagues about project work.

  14. An Effective Leader… • Organizes the team’s work and activities • Focuses on a data-based methods to solve the problem • Serves as contact point for communication between the team, sponsor, others in organization • Keeps official team records, e.g. meeting minutes, agendas, data related to project. • Assists with carrying out work between meetings • Implements project-driven changes within his or her authority • Helps team resolve its problems

  15. An Effective Coach… • Attends meetings but not is a leader or member; an outsider who maintains a neutral position. • Assists team in structuring or breaking down tasks and plans into assignments • Works with team leader to plan meetings • Assists leader with team building • Teaches data collection, analysis techniques; helps team graphically display data • Helps team prepare for presentation of project to management, others

  16. An Effective Sponsor… • Maintains overall responsibility, authority and accountability for project • Approves “bubble-up projects,” assures compatibility with organizational priorities • Sometimes initiates project, begins charter, selects leader, coach and members • Approves resources for project • Interfaces with rest of the organization to assure appropriate stakeholder involvement • Feeds data and lessons learned into a system for future improvements, e.g. policy changes

  17. Reality Check • Is everybody clear about the roles? • Does everyone have a role? • Are the leader, coach, sponsor roles filled? If not, what is the plan? • Next Step: What’s our problem?

  18. Module 3 Identifying the Problem

  19. QI Toolkit: Identifying Problems • Brainstorming – generating a list of potential problems • Interviews or surveys - customer feedback, recommendations • List reduction - narrowing the list to a few items, by combining into groups • Problem selection matrix

  20. QI Toolkit - Brainstorming Collect a large number of ideas from a group of people. Many ideas, quickly as possible. • One-at-a-time (everyone speaks) • Open door (call out ideas) • Write-it-down (confidentiality) Guidelines: • Be creative • Build on ideas of others • No critique allowed

  21. QI Toolkit – Interviews, Surveys Interviews: • Purpose: Collect data from direct conversation. Surveys: • Purpose: Collect data from • a large number of people.

  22. QI Toolkit – List Reduction • Purpose: Reduce a large list of items to a manageable size. • Useful in conjunction with brainstorming. • Group votes for the most important items on list (can cast as many votes as they want). • Items with the most votes are circled. • If further narrowing is required, process conducted again, limiting number of votes people can cast.

  23. QI Toolkit: Selection Matrix

  24. What’s Our Problem? A little history… • When did we notice the problem? • Was there anything else going on when we noticed it? • Have other solutions been tried in the past? • If so, what happened?

  25. What’s Our Problem? Zooming in on the current state: • What exactly is happening? • When is it happening? • Where is it happening? • Who is involved?

  26. What’s Our Problem? Zooming in on the future (or desired) state: • What should be happening? • When should it happen? • Where should it happen? • Who should make it happen?

  27. Current and Future State • Future State: • What are the important aspects of • the future state? • What is driving us to this future state? • What might be the consequences of • not moving to the future state? • What might change? • What is the proposed timeline? • Current State • What is the current state? • Why is this important? • What is it costing us time/dollars/staff/etc? • What is the impact on our customer/clients? • What is the impact on our division/agency? • Driving Forces: Pathway • Consequences • Benefits

  28. QI Toolkit - Force Field Analysis

  29. QI Toolkit – Flowchart Where is the process breaking down? RFFlow Professional Flowcharting, http://www.rff.com/flowchart_samples.htm

  30. Draft a Problem Statement • A good problem statement should be: • Specific. • Describes the problem, not the symptom. • Relates the current situation to what is desired. • Does not include causes or solutions

  31. Expressing Need for Improvement in Measurable Terms Two-Step Process: • Gathering information (data) about the problem. • Tool utilized: Checksheet • Organizing data so that it is meaningful and clarifies the problem. • Tools utilized: Line graphs, Pareto charts, Histograms, Bar and Pie charts.

  32. QI Toolkit: Checksheet Purpose: Collect data in an organized manner. Telephone Interruptions Excerpted from Nancy R. Tague’sThe Quality Toolbox, Second Edition, ASQ Quality Press, 2004, pages 141-142.

  33. QI Toolkit: Line Graph Purpose: Display the output of a process over time.

  34. QI Toolkit: Pareto Chart Purpose: Arrange data so that the most significant element in a set of elements is easily identifiable. Diagram courtesy of Six Sigma http://www.isixsigma.com/offsite.asp?A=Fr&Url=http://www.skymark.com/resources/tools/pareto_charts.htm

  35. QI Toolkit: Histogram Purpose: Determine how data are distributed.

  36. QI Toolkit: Bar Chart Purpose: Arrange data for quick and easy comparison.

  37. QI Toolkit: Pie Chart Purpose: Display the volume or quantity of one item in relation to others.

  38. Check Problem Statement Did data validate the original problem statement? • If not, revise and collect more data. • If it did, refine the problem statement so that it is: • Specific. • Describes the problem, not the symptom. • Relates the current situation to what is desired. • Does not include causes or solutions

  39. Establish Interim Target, Date • Targets should be: • Intermediate and long term • Quantitatively expressed • Aggressive • Changed as the situation changes • Example: This project aims to reduce the number of days it takes to process a payment voucher from 10 working days to 2 by December 31, 2010.

  40. Module 4 Analyze the Problem

  41. Identify the Root Cause(s) • If the cause is removed, the problem should be at least partially removed. • A symptom is not a cause; a symptom is evidence the problem exists. • Several root causes may contribute to the problem; it is important to examine all. • QI Tools for establishing root cause(s): Brainstorming, Flowcharts, Cause and Effect Diagrams, 5 Why’s.

  42. QI Toolkit: Cause and Effect Diagram Purpose: Identify a set of related causes that lead to an effect or problem.

  43. QI Toolkit: 5 Why’s

  44. Verify Cause by Collecting Data • QI Toolkit - Data collection and analysis: • Checksheet • Root Cause Evaluation Matrix • Histogram • Bar Chart • Pareto Chart

  45. Root Cause Evaluation Matrix

  46. Guidelines for Data Collection • Establish the purpose for collecting data – helps you target your efforts, collect only what is needed. • Determine if indicators are reliable – What is the source of data? Are measuring practices consistent and accurate? • Track all data needed – collect enough to conduct a thorough analysis. • Record data carefully – Use a checksheet that is logical and makes collection easy.

  47. Select Root Cause(s) Most Responsible • Example: Investigating delay associated with processing credit card applications, data could be grouped into the following categories: • No signature • No Address • Cannot read • Current customer • Other

  48. Module 5 Evaluate Alternate Solutions

  49. Developing Alternatives QI Toolkit: Brainstorming, interviews, survey, research (have others solved this problem?) Guidelines: • Be creative, identify as many potential solutions as possible. • Don’t be limited by the current practice (i.e. “That’s the way we’ve always done it. • Refrain from judging team members’ suggestions.

  50. Evaluating Alternatives • Effective? (Tried before? With what results? Will it solve the problem? Achieve improvement target?) • Feasible? (Is it doable? Practical?) • Timely? (How long will it take? Long term or short term? Can we afford to wait?) • Customer-oriented? (Will it improve service quality? Satisfy customer identified requirements?) • Efficient? (Is it cost effective?)

More Related