1 / 22

Options for Community Structures: Wastewater Treatment

Options for Community Structures: Wastewater Treatment. On-Site Sewage Treatment Program http://septic.umn.edu Extension Educators Doug Malchow 507-280-5575 malch002@umn.edu Valerie Prax 320-225-5054 malmq002@umn.edu Laurie Brown 218-726-6464 brow1198@umn.edu.

marnie
Télécharger la présentation

Options for Community Structures: Wastewater Treatment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Options for Community Structures: Wastewater Treatment On-Site Sewage Treatment Program http://septic.umn.edu Extension Educators Doug Malchow 507-280-5575 malch002@umn.edu Valerie Prax 320-225-5054 malmq002@umn.edu Laurie Brown 218-726-6464 brow1198@umn.edu

  2. Points to keep in mind: • There are options for districts, but the public needs to be involved/informed all along the way • For all the options legal council needs to be involved • The MPCA only reviews the creation of Sanitary Districts under Minn.Stat. 115.19 to 115.20

  3. Why do we need a “communitystructure”? When multiple landowners work together a legal and responsible entity is usually needed to work on behalf of the community members.

  4. What roles might the entity play? Provide continuity within the project Acquire property or easements Obtain/administer financing to build project Negotiate contracts Develop and enforce project rules Recover costs of damages to the system Budget/Levy to manage, repair, and replace the system

  5. Determine District Boundaries Based Upon Need • Convince residents that they need improved wastewater treatment before drawing district boundaries • Residents with complaint wastewater treatment systems included within a district’s boundaries may not support a new wastewater treatment system if it will cost them money

  6. Typical Assessment Minnesota Lake Comply Don’t Comply

  7. More Complete Assessment Minnesota Lake Could Comply Comply Can’t Comply

  8. More complete assessment • Offers a complete understanding of the current situation • Basis to look at potential solutions • Helps determine appropriate boundaries • Fits with the proposed funding hierarchy changes

  9. Types of Entities that “could” Oversee a System • Lake or homeowner associations • Joint Exercise of Powers Agreements • Lake Improvement Districts • Sanitary (Sewer) Districts • Subordinate Service Districts

  10. Lake or Homeowner Associations Advantages • Early catalyst for action • Provide some funding • Educational network

  11. Lake or Homeowner Associations Disadvantages • Lack ability to levy for funds • Fee collection difficulties • Rules enforcement difficult • Lack accountability to government entity

  12. Joint Exercise of Powers Agreements Advantages • Allow issues that cross political boundaries to be addressed • Agreements carefully spell out issue, powers and responsibilities

  13. Joint Exercise of Powers Agreements Disadvantages • Time consuming- appointed board; multiple hearings; carefully outlined and detailed agreement between multiple partners • Any partner can withdraw, leaving remaining partners with obligations

  14. Lake Improvement Districts Advantages • Created by 26% of property owners within proposed area • Focused on improving water quality

  15. Lake Improvement Districts Disadvantages • County remains legal entity managing a small area; district can’t levy • All county residents responsible financially • Created by small number of residents

  16. Sanitary Districts Advantages • Independent commission may manage • Can levy and bond • Can write and enforce ordinances • Some can provide water service (116 A)

  17. Sanitary Districts Disadvantages • Created by petition/hearing process by MPCA • Boundaries and need established before petitioning MPCA • Lengthy process • Difficult to get consensus over large area

  18. Subordinate Service Districts Advantages • Can be created at the county or township level • Relatively easy/inexpensive to create in short time • Costs borne only by users • Can evolve easily over time as needs change

  19. Subordinate Service Districts Township 365A • Requires petition of 50% + 1 of property owners in contiguous area; signature verification • Public hearing • Board approves or disapproves • Reverse referendum by 25% of property owners puts district on hold; special election with simple majority of those voting rules • Can be enlarged • Dissolved via petition of 75% of property owners in district followed by Board decision

  20. Subordinate Service Districts County 375B – Creation by Resolution • Following public hearing • Can be withdrawn via resolution following public hearing

  21. Subordinate Service Districts County 375B – Creation by petition • Requires petition of 10% of qualified tax voters in proposed contiguous area • Public hearing • Board approves or disapproves • Reverse referendum by 5% of qualified tax voters in proposed area puts district on hold • Special election majority of votes rules • Withdrawal after petition by 10% of property owners followed by special election; majority • rules

  22. Questions?septic.umn.edu(Information for homeowners)

More Related