1 / 15

Hurst-Euless-Bedford Board of Trustees Continuous Improvement Report June15, 2009

Hurst-Euless-Bedford Board of Trustees Continuous Improvement Report June15, 2009. Board Mission Statement Adopted October 18, 2005 .

marsha
Télécharger la présentation

Hurst-Euless-Bedford Board of Trustees Continuous Improvement Report June15, 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hurst-Euless-BedfordBoard of TrusteesContinuous Improvement Report June15, 2009

  2. Board Mission Statement Adopted October 18, 2005 The mission of HEB ISD Board of Trustees is to effectively allocate resources, set policy, direct and support the superintendent on behalf of students, parents, staff, and community by engaging in a process of continuous improvement that results in the accomplishment of district goals.

  3. The H-E-B Board Journey The Board began its’ journey to becoming a high-performing Board in August, 2005, with the Board Effectiveness Audit, developed by the Texas Association of School Boards. The first time we completed the audit, we could see how far we had to go. We could not give ourselves high scores on many of the indicators, but we were encouraged that we were actually doing many of the things required to be an effective board, we simply had never documented them or built them in to our calendar. We went through the audit process again in April 2006, and noted some progress.

  4. The H-E-B Board Journey Continues • After training with Jim Shipley and Associates consultants, the Board began using the JSA Systems Check Level III to measure performance. We have completed the Systems Check every six months: • October 10, 2006 • June 11, 2007 • January 22, 2008 • May 19, 2008 • February 10, 2009 • June 15, 2009

  5. Board Goal #1Adopted March21, 2006 • In five years, the Board of Trustees will have demonstrated at least a proficiency level on all seven of the Performance Indicators of the Board Systems Check for Continuous Improvement (18 total indicators). • Performance Indicators (Baldrige Categories) • 1.0 Leadership • 2.0 Strategic Planning • 3.0 Stakeholder and Market Focus • 4.0 Measurement, Analysis, and • Knowledge Management • 5.0 Human Resources Focus • 6.0 Process Management • 7.0 Performance Results

  6. Systems Check The board met on June 15, 2009 with Terri Iles, our Coordinator for Continuous Improvement, and completed the Level III Systems Check for the sixth time. This Systems Check was completed with the Board reaching a consensus on each area. This is a summary showing the board’s progress on all the indicators.

  7. Board Progress on All Indicators

  8. Category 1.0 Leadership Advanced Proficient Progressing Not Yet

  9. Category 2.0 Strategic Planning Advanced Proficient Progressing Not Yet

  10. Category 3.0 Stakeholder and Market Focus Advanced Proficient Progressing Not Yet

  11. Category 4.0 Measurement, Analysis and Knowledge Management Advanced Proficient Progressing Not Yet

  12. Category 5.0 Human Resource Focus Advanced Proficient Progressing Not Yet

  13. Category 6.0 Process Management Advanced Proficient Progressing Not Yet

  14. Category 7.0 Performance Results Advanced Proficient Progressing Not Yet

  15. Actions to raise performance: • Board members will report individual goals • The Board will look for additional ways to gather data from other stakeholder groups • The Board will look for additional Boards to compare themselves to • The Board will look for additional ways to apply a continuous improvement approach to its work • The Board will look for additional Quality Tools to use during board meetings

More Related