1 / 15

1 .Regularity in Serving Meal:

1 .Regularity in Serving Meal:. Cooked meal given to primary and upper primary children regularly. 2. Trends:. It was observed during meal serving among present children took 15,512 (90%) in Primary and 10820(82.5%)

marshall-best
Télécharger la présentation

1 .Regularity in Serving Meal:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 1.Regularity in Serving Meal: • Cooked meal given to primary and upper primary children regularly. 2. Trends: • It was observed during meal serving among present • children took 15,512 (90%) in Primary and 10820(82.5%) • and 13222 (89.5%) in Primary and 8750 (80.7%) in Upper • Primary schools in North west Delhi and west Delhi. • Opted option not followed in all sampled districts.

  2. 3. Regularity in delivering food grains(at) to school/supplier’s kitchen level. • Directorate of Education’s appointed Mid-day meal • suppliers received food grains one month in advance. • MCD appointed suppliers received food grains • 30 to 40 days after the meals were served. • Suppliers reported that most of the time food grain • received as per the marked/indicated weight from FCI • godown.

  3. 4. Regularity in Delivering cooking costto school/ MDM supplier. • MCD appointed MDM suppliers reported that they • receive cooking costs on monthly basis. • Directorate of Education’s appointed MDM suppliers • receive cooking costs after 40 t0 50 days. • MDM supplier reported that some DOE schools • delayed in preparing bills. • Cooking cost payments are made through banking • channel.

  4. 5. Social Equity: • It was observed the children eat meals together and • no discrimination is practiced in this regard.

  5. 6. Variety of Menu • About 50% MCD and 5% Schools of Directorate of Education • in North West Delhi and about 50% MCD and 36% Schools of • Directorate of Education in west Delhi have displayed weekly • menu with details address of MDM suppliers. • Aided schools have not displayed weekly menu with details • address of MDM suppliers. • Meals served on six working days Monday to Saturday • comprise three days Rice based and three days wheat • based meals. • About 70% children in North West Delhi and 73% in • West Delhi did not prefer Halwa (wheat based Meal) • owing to substandard quality.

  6. 7. Quality and Quantity of Meal: • Invariably the quality of meals not satisfactory and the • quantity served was tends to be less than as per the • regulations. • The quality of the puri tended to be less than satisfactory • machine-made puris tend to be hard and sticky. • Upper primary school children least prefer MDMs owing to • sub standard quality and taste.

  7. 8.School Health Programme: • Micro nutrients and de-worming tablets were given to • MCD primary school children's in the last six • months. • Aided schools children are not covered under scheme . • Children’s Health cards are not maintained in any • sampled school.

  8. 9. Status of Cooks: • MDM Cooked and served by NGOs and charitable • Trusts appointed by the Education Departments. • . Suppliers have appointed helper to serve meal to • children. • Helpers are not appointed as per GOI norms. • The number of helpers are inadequate in many cases, • helpers were unable to serve meal all the children during • the break due to shortage of time.

  9. 10. Infrastructure: • There are no kitchen sheds in schools. MDM provided • to children through centralised kitchen . • Suppliers have set - up centralized Kitchens. • LPG used for cooking. • Most of the children carry drinking water from their • home.

  10. 11. Safety and Hygiene: • In general, the environment of MDM kitchens in terms of safety and hygiene in cooking and storage could be said to be good. i.e. six points on scale of one to ten. • Children not asked to wash hands before meals due to constraint of time. • Teacher supervision during meal distribution tend to be insufficient .

  11. 12. Community participation: • Participation of parents and community monitoring, supervision and distribution of MDM was generally poor in schools. • It was observed that most of the schools teachers/ community participants do not taste meals before distribution among children. • Community member/VKS/PTA had poor awareness levels on MDM entitlement of cooked meal prescribed by department.

  12. 13. Management Information System (MIS): • About 51%DOE and 56% MCD schools have maintained MDM register. • Majority of MDM in-charge had poor awareness of entitlement and norms prescribed by the department. • No records maintained of cooked meal received in DOE and aided schools. • Training was not imparted to the MDM in-charge/principals on maintaining of MDM information and register in DOE/aided schools.

  13. 14. Staffing: • Independent officer not engaged at district /zonal level by Directorate of Education or MCD. 15.Financial Management: • Mid day meal supplier did not shown maintenance of account during MI Kitchen visit. THANKS Presentation by: T.K Singh, Project coordinator Centre for the Study of Development Societies, 29, Rajpur Road – 110054, Delhi Mobile No: 9871205976, Email ID : tksingh2@rediffmail.com

  14. 15.Financial Management: • Mid day meal supplier did not shown maintenance of account during MI Kitchen visit. THANKS Presentation by: T.K Singh, Project coordinator Centre for the Study of Development Societies, 29, Rajpur Road – 110054, Delhi Mobile No: 9871205976, Email ID : tksingh2@rediffmail.com

More Related