1 / 28

B-physics with the initial ATLAS detector

B-physics with the initial ATLAS detector. Aleandro Nisati for the ATLAS Collaboration INFN Commissione Scientifica I February 3rd, 4th 2003. outline. The initial experiment conditions The ATLAS Physics Programme The ATLAS detector & trigger

masao
Télécharger la présentation

B-physics with the initial ATLAS detector

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. B-physics with the initial ATLAS detector Aleandro Nisati for the ATLAS Collaboration INFN Commissione Scientifica I February 3rd, 4th 2003

  2. outline • The initial experiment conditions • The ATLAS Physics Programme • The ATLAS detector & trigger • B-physics potential with the nominal detector @ L=1033 cm-2 s-1; • Preliminary estimate of the B-physics potential with the initial detector and luminosity; • Conclusions

  3. The initial experiment conditions Many uncertainties: • The LHC luminosity: the target initial luminosity was doubled to L= 2 x 1033 cm-2 s-1; • The detector configuration; in particular the initial HLT/DAQ system bandwidth and processing power (resources limitations); • The physics rates (uncertainties on p,K and heavy flavour production cross-sections);

  4. The initial experiment conditions • Results presented here refer to the nominal detector configuration and L= 1x1033 cm-2 s-1[Yellow Report CERN 2000-004] ; • The analysis with the initial detector layout (including the change of the B-layer radial position, re-evaluation of the material distribution in the ID) as a function of luminosity and the trigger conditions is on-going (within the Data Challenge project); however some preliminary indications on the degradation of the physics performances will be provided.

  5. The ATLAS Physics Programme • The most prominent issues for the LHC are the quest for the origin of the spontaneous symmetry-breaking mechanism (SM and MSSM) and the search for new physics: SuSy, Heavy Bosons, etc… • ATLAS (and CMS) is a general-purpose experiment optimized to maximize the potential discovery new physics: Higgs boson(s) , SuSy particles, W’ and Z’, etc… • However we have to consider that: • The LHC is a beauty factory  dedicated B-experiment (LHCb); • The ATLAS detector allows also a wide programme of B-physics studies, competitive with LHCb in some channels, “for free”…

  6. Cross-sections and rates • huge range of cross-section values and rates • listed for 1034 cm-2 s-1 • total • s 100 mb (109 Hz) • b production • s 0.7 mb (7*106 Hz) • W/Z production • s 200/60 nb (2/0.6 kHz) • Top production • s 0.8 nb (80 Hz) • SM Higgs (mH = 150 GeV) • s 30 pb (3 Hz) • With branching ratios included • W  en 150 Hz • Z  ee 15 Hz • H  gg 0.003 Hz

  7. B-simulation • Monte Carlo generator: PYTHIA 5.7/JETSET 7.4; • Flavour creation, flavour excitation and gluon splitting included; • CTEQ2L parton distribution; • Peterson function eb=0.007 • Full GEANT3 simulation of the detector response; in some case integrated with fast simulation; • Total inelastic cross-section: 80 mb; bb cross section: 500 mb;

  8. The ATLAS experiment Pixel module Muon Trigger Elx and Algor. LAr e.m. endcap module Tile Calorimeter Module(s) MDTchamber assembly RPC chambers

  9. The ATLAS Trigger/DAQ System Detectors 1 GHz interaction rate / 40 MHz bunch-crossing rate Front-end m 2 s latency Level 1 Pipelines <75 (100) kHz ~100 GB/s output data flow Readout Drivers O(10) ms latency Level 2 Readout Buffers O(1) kHz output rate O(1) GB/s output data flow Event Builder Buffers & ~ seconds latency Processing Event Filter Farms O(100) Hz output rate O(100) MB/s output data flow Data Storage LVL1 • Hardware based (FPGA and ASIC) • Coarse calorimeter granularity • Trigger muon detectors: RPCs and TGCs RoI Pointers • LVL2 • Region-of-Interest (RoI) • Specializedalgorithms • Fast selection with early rejection HLT EF • Full event available • Offline derived algorithms • Seeding by LVL2 • Best calibration / alignment • Latency less demanding

  10. The Atlas B-Physics Programme • The main physics processes that can be studied: • CP violation: • Asymmetry in B0d  J/Y K0s  measurement of sin2b; • Asymmetry in B0s  J/Yf; test of the SM; • Asymmetry in B0d,s  h+ h-  measurement of b+g; • B0s - B0s oscillations; • Rare B-decays with dimuons: B0d,sm+ m-, B0dK*0m+ m-, B0sf0m+ m -, … • Also: • B-production cross-section measurement; • Lb polarisation measurement; • Related to B-physics: direct J/Y, U production

  11. The B-trigger -1 • L=1 x 1033 cm-2 s-1; • Level-1: single muon trigger pT > 6 GeV/c, |h|<2.5; • Rate is expected to be about 23 kHz; • dominated by in-flight decays of p,K and heavy flavour muon production; • Dimuon trigger possibly with lower thresholds; • Raise thresholds for higher luminosities; • Level-2, step 1: confirm level-1 muon trigger in RoI; • Use precision muon system together with ID for momentum measurement  important rejection of in-flight decays; • Rate: about 5 kHz;

  12. The B-trigger -2 • Level-2, step 2: • Specific selections are applied for different channels; in all cases we perform a track reconstruction in the Inner Detector with: • Either an ID full-scan; • Or RoI-based ID track reconstruction. • ID full scan: unguided search for tracks in all Pixel system; track extrapolation to the SCT+TRT (electrons down to 1 GeV); • RoI approach: consider only regions with calorimeter activity tagged by level-1 system: example: em cluster ET>2 GeV; hadronic cluster: ET >5 GeV; it requires less processing power resources (but less efficient)

  13. The B-trigger -3 • J/Psim+m-: two opposite muons pT1>6 GeV and pT2 >3 GeV (m in TileCal); mass cuts; • J/Psie+e -: two opposite-charge electrons with both pT1 >1GeV; mass cuts; rate @ lvl2: 40 Hz (lvl1 mu8, L=1 x 1033 cm-2 s-1); • B hadrons: example: B h+ h-: two opposite tracks with pT>4 GeV; mass cuts;

  14. The B-trigger -4 • Event Filter: track refit, including a vertex fit; decay length and fit quality cuts are applied; • about a factor of 10 wrt LVL2 can be achieved by exclusive selections.

  15. B0d  J/Y K0s • J/Y l+l- reconstruction; mass resolution: 40 MeV (muons) and 60 MeV (electrons); • K0sp+p-: 4.5 – 7.0 MeV mass resolution; • B0d: 3D kinematic fit applying vertex and mass constraint; B0d mass resolution: 19 (26) MeV; • Background mainly from B decays with a J/Y in the finals state; small contribution from false J/Y ; B0d reconstruction; CDF has shown a similar signal; sb/stot and prod. rate improved at LHC

  16. Flavour tagging: Opposite-side tagging: muon (trigger) or electron (pt>5 GeV); Dtag = 0.5; Same-side tagging: B-p algorithm (charged meson associated with the B-hadron); Dtag = 0.16; Event yeld for 30 fb-1 @ L=1x1033cm-2 s-1 B0d  J/Y K0s

  17. B0d  J/Y K0s Statistical Error: Estimate of the statistical error of sin2b using a time-dependent analysis with an integrated luminosity of 30 fb-1. • Overall statistical error: • 10 fb-1: 0.018 • 30 fb-1: 0.010 • Competitive with LHCb and B-factories

  18. B0d  J/Y K0s Systematic Error: • analysis of control samples: • B+ J/Y(mm)K+ • B0dJ/Y(mm)K*0 • Provide measurements of Dtag, and Ap. Invariant mass distribution for B0d  J/Y K+ with superimposed the Estimated background.

  19. B0d  J/Y K0s • Systematic errors • dDtag/Dtag: 0.003 • dDback/Dback: 0.006 • dAP: 0.0005; Global systematic error: < 0.01

  20. B0d,s  h+ h- • Expected to provide measurements of the CP asymmetry related to the angle a. • ATLAS does not have an event-by-eveny particle identification, but can separate on statistical basis; the signals from all significant two-body decays of b-hadrons will overlap: B0dp+ p-, B0dK+ p-, B0sK- p+, B0sK+ K-, Lbpp-, LbpK-; dACP: about 0.1 . Can provide cross-check of results from dedicate B-experiments

  21. B0s - B0s oscillations • Processes considered: • B0s Ds-p+ and B0s Ds-a1+ ; (Ds -fp-; fK+K-) • Event reconstruction includes vertices and masses reconstruction; • Proper time resolution: rms=0.06 ps. • Event yield in 30 fb-1: • 7100 B0s Ds-p+ and 2600 B0s Ds-a1+ ; • Background: mainly from B0dDs-a1+, B0dDs-p+ (2200 events) and from the combinatorial background (11300 events)

  22. B0s - B0s oscillations • Dms reach evaluated with the amplitude-fit technique; it is measurable with more than 5s if: • Dms < 22.5 ps-1; L=10 fb-1; • Dms < 29.5 ps-1; L=30 fb-1; The measurement significance as a function of Dms for L=30 fb-1;

  23. Rare decays with dimuons • The decays B0sm+ m- and B0d  m+ m- have very small BR but they can be selected by the atlas trigger even at the nominal LHC luminosity. With 130 fb-1 of data the reaction B0sm+ m- can be seen with 4.7s assuming the S.M. BR of 4.9 10-9. • Another interesting class of reactions are exclusive decays such as B0sf0m+ m - , B0dr0m+ m- , B0dK*0m+ m- , … • Detailed measurements of the decays can test the SM  search for new physics (eg AFB in decay)

  24. Initial ATLASconfiguration • New radial position of the B-layer since the Yellow report (CERN 2000-004) • Limited resources and technical/schedule constraints • effect: detector staging and TDAQ staging. • Stage the following components (defer for 1-2 years) • The middle pixel layer (not the B-layer) • Outermost TRT wheels, half of the CSC layers • MDT chambers in transition region (EES, EEL) • Cryostat gap scintillators, part of high luminosity shielding • Reduction of Read-Out Drivers for LAr calorimeter

  25. Initial detector configuration • Main effect to the B-physics performance due to the detector layout wrt to the Yellow Book results comes from the change of the B-layer radial position (from 4.30 cm to 5.05 cm) and from the material in and before that layer (increased thickness of the beam pipe and pixel services); preliminary estimations with DC1 data analysis: • Impact parameter resolution and proper time resolution degraded by about 30%; • Mass resolutions degraded by about 15%; • Reconstruction efficiencies: no important degradation found; • Effects of the missing pixel layer under study.

  26. T/DAQ Deferrals • Temporary re-allocation of TDAQ sub-system resources will be used to fund overcosts in common projects • Would lead to drastic reduction in initial HLT/DAQ system if additional funds not obtained (only about 1/2 of the HLT/DAQ CORE budget remaining!) • Impact of deferrals on rate capability is difficult to estimate. • Evaluation of rate capability versus cost requires understanding behavior of HLT/DAQ (whose design is not yet complete) as a function of many parameters • At this time, we use a simplified cost model with significant uncertainties

  27. T/DAQ Deferrals & LHC lum. • The target initial luminosity was doubled to L= 2 x 1033 cm-2 s-1; •  increase the low-pT inclusive muon trigger threshold; • include the low pt inclusive muon trigger with a low-pT dimuon trigger; • Consequences: • CP violation: dsin2b: 0.010  0.015 (dimuon trigger only); • Mixing cannot be studied with dimuon trigger only; • Rare B decays: unaffected; • Restore the low lumi trigger menu as soon as L approaches values close to 1x1033 cm-2 s-1;

  28. Summary Although ATLAS is designed to probe the O(1TeV) energy scale, this experiment can make several useful measurements in the B-physics sector: • Sensitivity to sin2b comparable to that of LHCb; • Measurement of the B0s- B0s oscillations; • Unique opportunity to search for rare B0s decays: potential indirect evidence of new physics.

More Related