1 / 11

Open Method of Coordination

Open Method of Coordination. Viveca Arrhenius Ministerial adviser Helsinki, 5 May 2009. Decision-making in the EU. The Council of the European Union (the Council of Ministers) is the EU’s legislative body and its principal decision-making institution.

mattox
Télécharger la présentation

Open Method of Coordination

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Open Methodof Coordination Viveca Arrhenius Ministerial adviser Helsinki, 5 May 2009

  2. Decision-making in the EU The Council of the European Union (the Council of Ministers) is the EU’s legislative body and its principal decision-making institution. The Commission can present legislative proposals and handles administration and implementation. The European Parliament participates in the decision-making processes with the Council within the co-decision procedure.

  3. Background to the OMC The EC Treaty, articles 136 and 137. The Council’s conclusions regarding the implementation of the Open Method of Coordination in the social arena in 2000 (new launch). The Commission communication of 2 July 2008 entitled ‘A renewed commitment to social Europe: Reinforcing the Open Method of Coordination for Social Protection and Social Inclusion’ COM(2008)418 final.

  4. Objectives An instrument for political cooperation between the EU (the Council) and the member states in a situation where the EC has no legal authority. Based on voluntary cooperation between the member states.

  5. The Undertaking To set common guidelines, objectives and time-frames. To establish quantitative and qualitative indicators and reference markers which are to be adjusted to the needs of member states. European guidelines are to be transferred to national and regional policies. Regular overseeing and evaluation through a process by which we learn from one another.

  6. The Process (a three-year cycle) Query to member states about national points of view and problems. Discussions and decisions on common objectives and indicators. National Action Plans are worked out. The Council approves a joint report and joint key messages.

  7. Application in Social Affairs Policy From 2006 onwards, one National Strategic Report on Social Protection and Social Inclusion 2008–2011 to cover: pensions social inclusion healthcare, medical care and long-term care need for new themes?

  8. Benefits of the OMC Creates a forum where new questions can be raised and prioritised. Enables us to chart and analyse the situation in the entire EU and make a joint stand. Strengthens the social dimension and adds political visibility to the area: brings the EU closer to the citizens. Gives member states the opportunity to learn about different models. At present OMC is the only and best method for cooperation in the social sphere of the EU.

  9. Drawbacks of the OMC It creates unrealistic political expectations. It is labour-intensive, inefficient and bureaucratic. There is overlap. It lacks national political support. It’s a method for a small group of civil servants.

  10. The Commission’s development suggestions Better and more strategic integration of available EU instruments. Better support in other areas of policy. More efficient analysis and setting of qualitative objectives and indicators. Better and more systematic spreading of the results. Member states must take more political responsibility for the implementation of guidelines and objectives.

  11. National Preparation Processes Cooperation within government (ministries, the cabinet office, standing committees) Support in Parliament (statements regarding so-called U-matters and E-matters) Co-influence from various interest groups  Finland’s point of view

More Related