1 / 45

IEEE 802.11 TGaf DRAFT Meeting Plan and Agenda

IEEE 802.11 TGaf DRAFT Meeting Plan and Agenda. Date: 2010-07-12. Authors:. Abstract. This presentation is the agenda and meeting plan for the meeting of IEEE 802.11 TGaf taking place the week of July 11, 2010 at the IEEE 802 Plenary in San Diego, CA. Plan for the Week.

maxine-ross
Télécharger la présentation

IEEE 802.11 TGaf DRAFT Meeting Plan and Agenda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IEEE 802.11 TGafDRAFT Meeting Plan and Agenda Date: 2010-07-12 Authors: Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  2. Abstract This presentation is the agenda and meeting plan for the meeting of IEEE 802.11 TGaf taking place the week of July 11, 2010 at the IEEE 802 Plenary in San Diego, CA Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  3. Plan for the Week • Overview of the Technical Review and comment spreadsheet • Joint session with 802.19 and 802.22 (Tuesday PM3) • Comment resolution • Direct the Editor to create new draft • Plan for September and teleconferences Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  4. Tuesday AM2 Agenda • Meeting call to order • Administrative items including IEEE IP statement • Modify and approve the agenda • Approve meeting and teleconference minutes • Vote to approve Draft d0.03 • Approve comment spreadsheet in 10-11/595r8 • Vote on submissions reviewed on teleconferences • Review TVWS regulatory requirement basics • Review Internal Review comments • Begin comment resolution • Recess Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  5. Administrative Items • Please be familiar with the documents at the following links: • IEEE Patent Policy - http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt • Patent FAQ - http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/faq.pdf • LoA Form - http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/loa.pdf • Affiliation FAQ - http://standards.ieee.org/faqs/affiliationFAQ.html • Anti-Trust FAQ - http://standards.ieee.org/resources/antitrust-guidelines.pdf • Ethics - http://www.ieee.org/portal/cms_docs/about/CoE_poster.pdf • IEEE 802.11 Working Group Policies and Procedures - https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/public-file/07/11-07-0360-04-0000-802-11-policies-and-procedures.doc •  Chair , Vice-chair and Secretary • Chair: Rich Kennedy (Research In Motion) • Vice-chair: Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems) • Recording Secretary: Zhou Lan (NICT) Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  6. Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants: • “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents • “Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents orpatent claims • “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) • The above does not apply if the patentclaim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2 • Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged • No duty to perform a patent search Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  7. Patent Related Links All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6 IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3 Material about the patent policy is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee.org or visit http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/index.html This slide set is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  8. Call for Potentially Essential Patents If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: • Either speak up now or • Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or • Cause an LOA to be submitted Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  9. Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings • All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. • Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. • Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. • Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. • Technical considerations remain primary focus • Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. • Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. • Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. --------------------------------------------------------------- See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  10. Meeting Etiquette • IEEE 802 is a world-wide professional technical organization • Meetings are to be conducted in an orderly and professionalmanner in accordance with the policies and procedures governed by the organization. • Individuals are to address the “Technical” content of the subject under consideration and refrain from making “personal” comments to or about the presenter. Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  11. Introduction • WELCOME to the third face-to-face meeting of IEEE 802.11 TGaf! • On Friday, November 20, 2009 the IEEE 802.11 TGaf was approved by the EC (10/1/4) with this motion: • Believing that the PAR and Five Criteria contained in the document referenced below meet IEEE-SA guidelines, • Move to forward the 802.11 TVWS PAR information from 11-09/934r8 to NesCom. • On December 8th NesCom approved the formation of the Task Group for P802.11af • We have just completed an Internal Review and have many comments to review and resolve Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  12. PAR Scope and Purpose • Approved PAR Scope: An amendment that defines modifications to both the 802.11 physical layers (PHY) and the 802.11 Medium Access Control Layer (MAC), to meet the legal requirements for channel access and coexistence in the TV White Space • Approved PAR Purpose: The purpose of this amendment is to allow 802.11 wireless networks to be used in the TV white space Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  13. Purpose, Principles and Vision/Outcome“If you don't know where you are going, you might wind up someplace else.”* • 11-06-0056-00-0000-cbp-and-david-allens-methods • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getting_Things_Done • Purpose: the Task Group should create an amendment whose implementation in solutions is likely to receive FCC approval for operation in the TV White Spaces under the 47 CFR Part 15 subpart H rules. • Principles: • If the FCC changes the rules, the Task Group should change the amendment accordingly • The amendment should not duplicate functionality that is being standardized in other Task Groups that are likely to complete before 802.11af. • There is no need for backwards compatibility with 2.45 GHz ISM operation. • The starting point is changes to Clauses 17 and 20 and Annexes I and J • Vision/Outcome: Use the OFDM PHYs with 5-, 10- and 20-MHz channel widths to specify the basis for a system that the regulators can approve for operation in the TVWS bands. * Yogi Berra Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  14. Motion #1 • Approve Meeting & Teleconference Minutes • May Meeting in Beijing • 11-10-0680-00-00af-meeting-minutes-for-Beijing-2010 (posted 5/28) • June 8th, June 22nd and July 6th teleconferences • 11-10-0701-00-00af-June-8th-teleconference-minutes (posted 6/15) • 11-10-0746-01-00af-june-22th-teleconference-minutes (posted 7/6) • 11-10-0757-00-00af-july-6th-teleconference-minutes (posted 7/8) • Motion: • To approve the TGaf minutes from the May Wireless Interim in Beijing and the June 8th, June 22nd and July 6th teleconferences in documents 11-10/680r0, 11-10/701r0, 11-10/746r1 and 11-10/757r0 respectively • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Discussion on the motion? None heard • Vote: Approved by unanimous consent Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  15. Motion #2 • Approve Draft d0.03 • Draft d0.03 is the approved d0.02 with changes required because TGaf will complete after TGmb • Draft d0.03 will be that starting point for the incorporation of comment resolutions this week • Motion: To approve P802.11af draft d0.03 as the base for the P802.11af amendment • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Discussion on the motion? None heard • Vote: Approved by unanimous consent Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  16. Motion #3 • Move: To accept 11-10/595r8 as the comment spreadsheet for d0.03 • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Discussion on the motion? None heard • Vote: Approved by unanimous consent Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  17. Motion #4 • Approval of submissions reviewed on teleconferences • Move to approve 11-10/695r2 to resolve spreadsheet (11-10/595r8) comment 148. • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Discussion on the motion? • Vote: x YES, y NO, z ABSTAIN Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  18. Motion #5 • Approval of submissions reviewed on teleconferences • Move to approve 11-10/731r0 to resolve spreadsheet (11-10/595r8) comments 4,5, 35 and 64. • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Discussion on the motion? • Vote: x YES, y NO, z ABSTAIN Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  19. Motion #6 • Approval of submissions reviewed on teleconferences • Move to approve 11-10/739r0 to resolve spreadsheet (11-10/595r8) comments 4,5, 35 and 64. • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Discussion on the motion? • Vote: x YES, y NO, z ABSTAIN Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  20. Motion #7 • Approval of submissions reviewed on teleconferences • Move to approve 11-10/737r0 to resolve spreadsheet (11-10/595r8) comments 4, 5, 6, 23, 68, 75 and 82. • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Discussion on the motion? • Vote: x YES, y NO, z ABSTAIN Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  21. Motion #8 • Approval of submissions reviewed on teleconferences • Move to approve 11-10/709r0 and ask the Editor to incorporate it into draft d0.04 • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Discussion on the motion? • Vote: x YES, y NO, z ABSTAIN Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  22. Motion #9 • Approval of submissions reviewed on teleconferences • Move to approve 11-10/710r0 and ask the Editor to incorporate it into draft d0.04. • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Discussion on the motion? • Vote: x YES, y NO, z ABSTAIN Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  23. Motion #10 • Approval of submissions reviewed on teleconferences • Move to approve 11-10/xxxry and ask the Editor to incorporate it into draft d0.04. • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Discussion on the motion? • Vote: x YES, y NO, z ABSTAIN Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  24. Motion #11 • Approval of submissions reviewed on teleconferences • Move to approve 11-10/xxxry and ask the Editor to incorporate it into draft d0.04. • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Discussion on the motion? • Vote: x YES, y NO, z ABSTAIN Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  25. Motion #12 • Approval of submissions reviewed on teleconferences • Move to approve 11-10/xxxry and ask the Editor to incorporate it into draft d0.04. • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Discussion on the motion? • Vote: x YES, y NO, z ABSTAIN Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  26. Motion #13 • Approval of submissions reviewed on teleconferences • Move to approve 11-10/xxxry and ask the Editor to incorporate it into draft d0.04. • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Discussion on the motion? • Vote: x YES, y NO, z ABSTAIN Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  27. Motion #14 • Approval of submissions reviewed on teleconferences • Move to approve 11-10/xxxry and ask the Editor to incorporate it into draft d0.04. • Moved by: • Seconded by: • Discussion on the motion? • Vote: x YES, y NO, z ABSTAIN Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  28. TV Bands Regulatory Requirements • These [FCC] rules are primarily intended to ensure the efficient sharing of the TV Bands while protecting incumbent users • The FCC has enabled this band for TVBDs if and only if the licensed users’ interests are protected • We must not interfere • Mitigation of any interference issue should not increase the enforcement requirements for the Commission • There are no formal changes in regulatory status since Beijing Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  29. Our Selected Terminology • We voted to standardize on “TV White Space” • From the Los Angeles minutes: 6.2. Straw poll: “Which of the following terms is preferred as the expansion of TVWS: TV White Space, TV White Spaces, TV Whitespaces, and TV Band White Space.” 6.2.1. Results: • TV White Space: 17 • TV White Spaces: 3 • TV Whitespaces: 0 • TV Band White Space: 0 • Most of the rest of the industry and regulators use “TV White Spaces” • Should we re-choose our term to agree with everyone else? Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  30. Some Regulator Definitions • FCC: “…rules to allow unlicensed radio transmitters to operate in the broadcast television spectrum at locations where that spectrum is not being used by licensed services (this unused TV spectrum is often termed “white spaces”)”. • ITU-R: “A label indicating a part of the spectrum, which is available for a radiocommunication application (service, system) at a given time in a given geographical area on a non-interfering / non-protected basis with regard to other services with a higher priority on a national basis.” Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  31. The Internal Review • Started May 6th • Closed May 16th (Midnight EDT – Noon May 17th here) • 16 Responders • 150 Comments received • Resolutions discussed and submissions received on teleconferences Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  32. Comment Spreadsheet Review • 11-10/595r8 Comment Resolution Spreadsheet • adds D0.02 submission column (Q) to assist in proposed comment resolutions per July 6th teleconference discussion • Column Q lists the source of text being commented on • Column P is empty, to work on proposed resolutions Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  33. Comment Resolution Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  34. Tuesday PM3 Joint Session Agenda • Meeting call to order • Administrative items including IEEE IP statement • Modify and approve the agenda • 802.11 TGaf Chair Election • Review 802.11 TGaf status and progress • Review 802.19 status and progress • 4 presentations • Introduction and status • System design document • 802.19 July Tutorial • 802.19 July Workshop • Review 802.22 status and progress • Recess Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  35. Wednesday PM2 and 3 Agenda • Meeting call to order • Modify and approve the agenda • Administrative items • Reminder and Call for essential patents • Review and resolve comments • Direct the Editor to create new draft • Adjourn Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  36. TGaf Timeline – Updated July 2010 • Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: September 2010 • Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: November 2010 • Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: January 2011 • Initial Sponsor Ballot: March 2011 • Approved Sponsor Ballot: May 2011 • Final WG/EC Approval: November 2011 • RevCom/Standards Board Approval: December 2011 Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  37. Teleconferences • July 20 • August 3, 17 and 31 • September 28 • October 12 and 26 • November 2 and16  • Time: 22:00 ET for 90 minutes Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  38. Planning for September • Continue resolving comments from the Technical Review • Revise Draft 0.04(?) Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  39. Any Other Business • None Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  40. Process of Getting toLetter Ballot and Beyond Completed Steps | Future Steps • Adoption of PAR and 5 Criteria • Technical Presentations and Discussions • Specify Any Additional Requirements, Comparison Criteria, or Other Documents • Call For Proposals • Presentation of Proposals • Select from Submitted Complete Proposals to Produce a Draft • Refine Draft • Letter Ballot – September 2010 • Recirculation – November 2010 • Sponsor Ballot – January 2010 • Recirculation - • Final WG/EC Approval – June 2011 • IEEE SB REVCOM Approval – July 2011 Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  41. 3 Cycles of Comments and Resolution Call for Informal Comments Comment Resolution WG Letter Ballot Comment Resolution, Recirculation Sponsor Ballot Comment Resolution, Recirculation Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  42. References • 11-09-0749-03-0000-802.11-in-the-tvws • IEEE Std 802.11-2007 IEEE Standard for Information Technology— Telecommunications and information exchange between systems— Local and metropolitan area networks— Specific requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications • FCC 08-260 Second Report and Order and Memorandum and Order (http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-260A1.pdf) • 11-09-0934-09-tvws-par-nescom-form-plus-5c • 11-06-0056-00-0000-cbp-and-david-allens-methods • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getting_Things_Done • 11-10-0021-06-00af-meeting-plan-and-agenda-los-angeles-2010 • 11-10-0210-08-000m-lb160-cid-2113-proposed-resolution • 11-10-0218-00-00af-draft-call-for-proposals • 11-10-0221-01-00af-feb-16-2010-teleconferenc-plan • 11-10-0226-00-00af-feb-16-telecon-minutes • 11-10-0238-03-00af-petere-amendment-proposal • 11-10-0248-01-00af-amendment-proposal-for-measurement-report Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  43. References [2] • 11-10-0253-01-00af-modification-on-dfs-and-dcf-procedure-adapting-to-fcc-rules-in-tvws-part-2-hidden-node • 11-10-0256-01-00af-modification-on-dfs-and-dcf-procedure-adapting-to-fcc-rules-in-tvws-part-1-synchronized-quiet • 11-10-0257-03-00af-regulatory-operating-classes-specifications • 11-10-0258-00-00af-mac-and-phy-proposal-for-802-11af • 11-10-0260-03-00af-radio-resource-measurement-type-and-procedure-for-tvws-application-under-fcc-rules • 11-10-0261-02-00af-enabling-procedure-of-communication-in-tvws-under-fcc-rules • 11-10-0262-01-00af-requirements-and-amendments-regarding-tvws-database-access • 11-10-0263-03-00af-amendment-proposal-for-tv-white-spaces-operation • 11-10-0288-00-00af-mar-9-2010-teleconferenc-plan • 11-10-0289-00-00af-summary-of-nict-fs-technical-proposals-for-tgaf • 11-10-0297-00-00af-march-9-teleconference-minutes Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  44. References [3] • 11-10-0299-02-00af-meeting-plan-and-agenda-orlando-2010 • 11-10-0405-00-00af-closing-report-orlando-2010 • 11-10-0428-00-00af-meeting-minutes-for-Orlando-2010 • 11-10-0447-01-00af-text-document-for-proposal-11-10-261 • 11-10-0448-01-00af-text-document-for-proposal-11-10-260 • 11-10-0449-03-00af-text-for-regulatory-operating-classes-specifications-proposal • 11-10-0437-01-00af-mar-30-2010-teleconferenc-plan-and-agenda • 11-10-0452-00-00af-march-30-teleconference-minutes • 11-10-0471-01-00af-apr-13-teleconference-plan-and-agenda • 11-10-0472-01-00af-normative-text-for-scanning-in-tv-whitespaces • 11-10-0475-00-00af-april-13-teleconference-minutes • 11-10-0481-01-00af-apr-27-teleconferenc-plan-and-agenda • 11-10-0512-00-00af-global-operating-channels • 11-10-0513-01-00af-relocating-3650mhz-enabling-signal • 11-10-0516-01-00af-april-27th-teleconference-minutes Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

  45. References [4] • 11-10-0575-00-00af-May-11th-teleconference-minutes • 11-10-0576-00-00af-meeting-plan-and-agenda-beijing-2010 (this document) • 11-10-0595-05-00af-d0-02-comment-spreadsheet Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

More Related