1 / 9

Evaluating Websites

Research Notebook Page 15. Evaluating Websites. Evaluating Websites. Accuracy Validity Authority Currency Coverage. Accuracy. Condition of being true and correct. Ask yourself: Is the site free from grammatical and typographical errors? Do the links and graphics operate properly?

may-buckner
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluating Websites

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Research Notebook Page 15 Evaluating Websites

  2. Evaluating Websites • Accuracy • Validity • Authority • Currency • Coverage

  3. Accuracy • Condition of being true and correct. • Ask yourself: • Is the site free from grammatical and typographical errors? • Do the links and graphics operate properly? • Was the information verified by a third party?

  4. Validity • Condition of being effective or sound • Ask yourself: • Does the information appear to be well-researched? • Is there a bibliography or list of sources? • Is there a statement about the purpose of the site? • Is there a place to note and communicate errors located on the site? • Does the site appear to be free from bias or a single position?

  5. Authority • Condition of being justified by the right source. • Ask yourself: • Are the author’s name and qualifications clearly identified? • Does the URL address match the site’s name? • Is the site part of a respected institution?

  6. Currency • The condition of being up-to-date . • Ask yourself: • Does the date the site was last updated appear? • Has the site been updated recently? • Are any parts of the site “under construction?” • Are the majority of the articles on the site a part of that site (as opposed to links to other sites?)

  7. Coverage • The condition of providing enough information. • Ask yourself: • Does the site seem to fully cover the topic? • Are there other, related topics discussed on the site? • Is there a resources section with links to other sites?

  8. Evaluating Websites Evaluate the following websites according the criteria previously presented. • www.procon.org • http://www2.potsdam.edu/hansondj/LegalDrinkingAge.html • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About • http://www.youthrights.org/drinkingage.php • http://www.opposingviews.com/questions/should-the-drinking-age-be-lowered-from-21

  9. Resources for Project • Page 9 of the Research Notebook lists lots of credible online sources. • Check this out: http://www.ncwiseowl.org/zones/middle/index.htm “Student Research”

More Related