1 / 20

MARK HODGSON ROAD2000 REVIEW KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

MARK HODGSON ROAD2000 REVIEW KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. ROAD2000. WHAT IS THE ROAD2000 PROJECT?. 2000 – Major political change in London Formation of GLA New Mayor Data requirement to allocate funding UKPMS software accredited, standardised surveys

mayese
Télécharger la présentation

MARK HODGSON ROAD2000 REVIEW KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MARK HODGSON ROAD2000 REVIEW KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

  2. ROAD2000

  3. WHAT IS THE ROAD2000 PROJECT? • 2000 – Major political change in London • Formation of GLA • New Mayor • Data requirement to allocate funding • UKPMS software accredited, standardised surveys • Proposal – survey and process to UKPMS standard 1300km roads and 1800km footways

  4. WHAT IS THE ROAD2000 PROJECT? • Aim • Provide consistent data in useful and useable format • Allocate funds • Maintenance programming • Monitor long term trends • BVPI’s / NI’s • Value for money

  5. WHAT IS THE ROAD2000 PROJECT? • Facts – over 10 years R2000 has: • Surveyed equivalent lane length to circumference of earth (40,000km) • £3.5m survey cost • £300m allocation • 1500 BVPI’s / NI’s

  6. Graph to show annual expenditure v condition

  7. WHAT IS THE ROAD2000 PROJECT? • Asset Surveys • Transport Commissioner wanted all TfL assets mapped • Applied to BPRN • 500,000 features, 100,000 changes p.a. • 75,000 linked photo’s • 125,000 posts & 100,000 signs • 66,000 gully’s • 57,000 lamp columns • 33,000 trees

  8. WHY HAVE A REVIEW? • Confirm still needed • If needed scope going forward? • 2005 – 5 year business plan • Times have changed: • 2005 £50m allocation • 2011 £15m allocation • BVPI / NI halved

  9. WHY HAVE A REVIEW? • Scope of review • Still needed? • Efficient processes? • Contract arrangements, value for money? • Are range and frequency of surveys appropriate? • What is the resource requirement • Is specialist consultancy used wisely?

  10. HOW ARE KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GOING TO AFFECT ME? • R2000 still needed? • Proven track record • Consistent data • NI’s • Less money – data more important? • Best practice in CSS framework for asset management • National and international interest • Finding: R2000 successful, new name R2010 • Recommendation: Continue

  11. HOW ARE KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GOING TO AFFECT ME? • Are processes efficient, scope to improve? • Finding: Processes efficient and streamlined • Recommendation: Continue existing approach

  12. HOW ARE KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GOING TO AFFECT ME? • Do contract arrangements provide value for money? • Rates 40% lower • Benchmarked – R2000 very good rates • New contracts being written – more scope for boroughs to access (eg DVI borough roads) • Finding: Good VFM • Recommendation: Make available for borough use

  13. HOW ARE KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GOING TO AFFECT ME? • Right surveys, right frequency? • Full network coverage, both directions • DVI, SCANNER, SCRIM • Consider reducing frequency / coverage • But, rapidly changing network • LBHF – 50% reduction: lost consistency and ability to prioritise • SCANNER AND DVI? • Finding: Current mix of surveys and frequencies is right • Recommendation: Continue

  14. HOW ARE KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GOING TO AFFECT ME? • Right Staff Resources? • 3 FTE’s • Data management and processing • CAD and GIS • Audit and contract management • Finding: 3 FTE’s about right • Recommendation: Spare resource directed to other commissions – eg. pan London contract

  15. HOW ARE KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GOING TO AFFECT ME? • Is specialist consultancy used wisely? • 5 to 20% of annual budget • Recent commissions included DVI v SCANNER comparison, skid resistance policy, supporting FCMG. • Other groups also undertake special studies • Finding: Used wisely, benefited London • Recommendation: Aligned with other groups, agreed by HMSG

  16. HOW ARE KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GOING TO AFFECT ME? • Miscellaneous activities • R2000 conference successful - TfL administering created savings • Pan London UKPMS license required • Website – better VFM if moved to LoTAG website • Finding: Miscellaneous activities are necessary • Recommendation: Continue to look for efficiencies and VFM

  17. Conclusions • Summary of recommendations: • 1. Continue ROAD2000 – but change name to ROAD2010 • 2. Continue with current mix and frequency of surveys • 3. Investigate if any other pan London work can be aligned to the R2010 work • 4. Specialist consultancy needs to fully align with other groups (e.g. LoTAMB, HMEG) and be agreed by the HMSG

  18. Questions

More Related