1 / 25

John E. Reuter - University of California, Davis

Pollutant Loading from Airshed & Watershed Sources to Lake Tahoe: Influence on Declining Lake Clarity. John E. Reuter - University of California, Davis. Presentation Topics. Lake Tahoe and overview of impacts Transport of toxics to lake

mayten
Télécharger la présentation

John E. Reuter - University of California, Davis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pollutant Loading from Airshed & Watershed Sources to Lake Tahoe: Influence on Declining Lake Clarity John E. Reuter - University of California, Davis

  2. Presentation Topics • Lake Tahoe and overview of impacts • Transport of toxics to lake • Atmospheric deposition, nutrient budget & nutrient limitation • Current research on nutrient and particle sources • Linkage to Tahoe TMDL

  3. Introduction to Lake Tahoe and Key Environmental Impacts

  4. Air Pollution - Just One of Multiple Ecosystem Stressors

  5. Features of Lake Tahoe • Subalpine, oligotrophic, low nutrients in soils • 800 km^2 drainage • 500 km^2 lake surface • 499 m max. depth • 650 yr hydraulic residence • 80% land managed by USFS • Urban-wildland interface

  6. Lake Tahoe: A Changing Ecosystem • Significant portions are urbanized • Increased resident population • Millions of tourists • Peak VMT >1,000,000 miles/day • Loss of wetland and runoff infiltration • Extensive road network • Land disturbance - soil erosion • Air pollution

  7. Changing Landscape has Lead to Following Lake Issues • Loss in transparency • Increased algal growth • Changes in biodiversity • Higher load of nutrients and fine-sediment • Wetland/riparian habitat loss • Invasion of non-native biota • Air quality impacts • Appearance of toxics (e.g. PCB, Hg, MTBE) • Significant effort on part of state and federal agencies, local government, universities and environmental consultants to address these and other issues

  8. Transport of Toxics to Lake and Incorporation into Biota Air Pollution is Just Not a Local Issue

  9. Regional Transport of Mercury Alan C. Heyvaert et al. (2000)

  10. Air, water, snow & fish samples taken at Tahoe and nearby lake showed measurable levels of PCBs Low levels of contamination but mass balance suggests: a) atmospheric sources dominate b) out-of-basin transport Transport of Organic Toxics S. Datta, F. Matsumura et al. (1998)

  11. Atmospheric Deposition, Nutrient Budget & Nutrient Limitation Influence on Long-term Decline of Lake Clarity

  12. Unraveling Cause(s) for Declining Water Clarity • Nutrients stimulate algae • Fine-sediments directly reduces clarity (1-20 µm) • Progressive accumulation leads to long-term decline • Management strategy - P, N, sediment control • Evidence for possible recovery • TMDL, EIP & other plans are addressing load reduction

  13. “Initial” Lake Tahoe Nutrient Budget Jassby et al. (1994), Reuter et al. (2000) Total-N Total-P Atmospheric Deposition 234 (59%) 12.4 (28%) Stream loading 82 (20%) 13.3 (31%) Direct runoff 23 (6%) 12.3 (28%) Groundwater 60 (15%) 4 (9%) Shore erosion 1 (<1%) 1.6 (4%) Total 400 43.6 • Strongly suggests importance of AD for nutrients • Little data on inorganic particle deposition (soils) • Size and low nutrient condition of Tahoe increases its importance • More work underway to improve initial estimate (ARB, DRI, UCD)

  14. Long-term shift from N&P co-limitation to consistent P limitation Data strongly suggests that AD, with high N:P ratio is associated with this shift Fundamental change in lake ecosystem function AD-N very important in coastal oceans Another example of airshed-watershed interaction Change in Algal Response to Nutrients Goldman et al. (1993), Jassby et al. (1994)

  15. Current Research on Nutrient and Particle Sources ‘Not So Elementary My Dear Watson’

  16. Current Research is a Work in Progress • Sources of N, P and fine-sediment - local, regional and global • In-basin or out-of-basin: a key management question • The Lake Tahoe Air Quality Research Scoping Document (Cliff et al. 2000) identified need to look at: • Fires (controlled/wild) • Road dust • Vehicle exhaust • Residential heating • Upwind emissions • LTADS -> CARB and universities are addressing source

  17. PM2.5 (µg/m3) based on 3 fire scenarios: a) Historical wildfire (12-16 ha) b) Hypothetical prescribed burn, 50-ha, Ward Valley c) Same as b, with 100-ha prescribed burn Significant implications for visibility and source for direct deposition LTAM Predicts Smoke PM2.5 forWildfire & Prescribed Burns S. Cliff & T. Cahill (2002)

  18. Top of bar = Particulate N Bottom of bar = Gaseous N Aircraft Measurements of N & P in Forest Fire Smoke in and Around Tahoe Basin Q. Zhang et al. (2002) • TN - 5-6 x higher in forest fire smoke than clean Tahoe air, with a greater contribution by ON • P - 10 x higher in smoke plume; much less P in slightly smokey air • Bulk deposition measured at Tahoe 5-10 times during smoke period • Smoke can be nutrient source, but depends on transport and deposition

  19. Aerosols at South Lake Tahoe:Evidence for the Role of Road Dust Cahill et al. (2003) • Continuous monitoring of 8 size modes (0.09-35 µm) in summer and winter with Drum Sampler at site downwind of Highway 50. Analysis for 32 elements done at 3 hr intervals. • Conclusions: •Hwy 50 major source of coarse particles (2.5-35 µm) • Particles >PM10 contain most P • Previous AQ studies did not focus on larger cuts • Hwy 50 also source of fine particles (0.09-0.26 µm) from diesels, smoking cars and fine ground road soil • Transport out over lake occurs each night • Data suggest that winter P is strong associated with road sanding/drying conditions while in summer values are more consistent day-to-day suggesting road dust from highway and near-highway soils • Contribution to whole-lake P budget now being evaluated

  20. Linkage to Tahoe TMDL Total Daily Maximum Load Best Understood as Water Clarity Restoration Plan

  21. Problem Statement • Numeric Target • Source Analysis • Linkage Analysis • Load Allocations • Margin of Safety • Implementation Plan Elements of a TMDL

  22. % Nitrogen Reduction 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 % Sediment Reduction 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Final Secchi Depth (m) 0 10 20 30 20- 25………Red 25.5-28…….Yellow 28.5-32.5…..Blue 33 & above..Purple 40 50 60 70 80 % Phosphorus Reduction 90 100 Conceptual Load Reduction Model • Informed by Clarity model • Multiple potential solutions Parameters are for illusrative purposes only

  23. Load Reduction Matrix

  24. Example Load Reduction Alternatives A Urban (34%): U-2, U-6, U-14, U-26, U-56, U-78 Atmospheric (12 %): A-3, A-7, A19, A43 Stream Channels (20%): ST-10, ST-34, ST-43 Ground Water (12%): GW-2, GW-4, GW-18 Forested Areas (22%): FA-11, FA-23, FA-25 TOTAL REDUCTION = 15,000 kg tbd/yr C Urban (20%) Atmospheric (15%) Stream Channels (30%) Ground Water (25%) Forested Area (15%) TOTAL REDUCTION = 15,000 kg tbd/yr B Urban (20%) Atmospheric (25%) Stream Channels (25%) Ground Water (15%) Forested Areas (15%) TOTAL REDUCTION = 15,000 kg tbd/yr Parameters are for illustrative purposes only

  25. Conclusion Science-Based Decision Making Stakeholder Driven

More Related