1 / 10

PHSSL Style Parliamentary Debate

PHSSL Style Parliamentary Debate. October 11, 2010 To listen to the audio, Skype: freeconferencecallhd and enter 511898# Or dial 951-262-4343 and enter 511898#. Motions. That this house believes that the use of nuclear energy should be expanded.

mbalas
Télécharger la présentation

PHSSL Style Parliamentary Debate

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PHSSL StyleParliamentary Debate • October 11, 2010 • To listen to the audio, • Skype: freeconferencecallhd and enter 511898# • Or dial 951-262-4343 and enter 511898#

  2. Motions • That this house believes that the use of nuclear energy should be expanded. • That this house believes that the minimum wage should be abolished. • That this house will presume consent for organ donation. • That this house believes that the US should abandon the war on drugs. • That this house believes that the filibuster is a useful tool in government. • That this house believes that the Federal Government must have an expanded role in the face of disasters.

  3. The Speeches • First Proposition- 6 min • First Opposition- 6 min • Second Proposition- 6 min • Second Opposition- 6 min • Third Proposition- 6 min • Third Opposition-6 min • Opposition Reply- 3 min • Proposition Reply- 3 min • Replies may not be given by the third speaker. • When time has elapsed, the speaker may finish her thought, then must sit.

  4. Points of Information • Questions asked by opponents during speeches • Opponent may stand between the first and last minute of constructive • To be recognized: stand up (some do teapot, some say “Point of Order”) • Speaking debater has complete control, may decline • Customary to take 1 or 2 per speech • No follow up questions

  5. The debate • Pounding in support of arguments • Conversational tone • Rhetorical style is good, humor is good

  6. The Proposition Case • Plans are not necessary, but allowed • Definitions are not necessary, but a plan which outlines burdens is good

  7. Constructive Speeches • May introduce new arguments • 1 & 2 should have independent points, 3 should be refutation • Clash is necessary, but not all points are created equally • Arguments should have warrants and data, with impacts

  8. Reply speeches • Should crystallize the round & re-frame the arguments • Don’t need to talk about everything • No new arguments

  9. How to Judge a Round • YOU MUST FLOW • Blend the importance of argument and rhetoric • Weigh “heavy” impacts (nuclear war) against “light” impacts (freedom of speech) • No personal beliefs are allowed.

  10. Other places to look • www.parlidebate.com has good rounds online • Don’t bother with the “cosmetic surgery” sample round from PHSSL • Feel free to send us an email

More Related