Download
1 / 14
150 likes | 320 Vues
Kardinia International College. Unit 4 Psychology Final Review Series AOS 2: Mental Health. Concepts of Normality . Normality: Normality is considered to be what is acceptable or what can be expected to happen in most circumstances .
E N D
Kardinia International College Unit 4 Psychology Final Review Series AOS 2: Mental Health
Concepts of Normality • Normality: Normality is considered to be what is acceptable or what can be expected to happen in most circumstances. • In a clinical context, it is a condition that does not require treatment or assistance.
Differentiation of Mental Health from Mental Illness • Mental Health: A state of emotional and social wellbeing in which a person can fulfil his or her abilities, cope with normal stresses of life, work productively and be able to contribute to the community. With sound mental health, individuals feel good about themselves and are able to get on with their lives smoothly. • Mental Health Problem: Where a person’s feelings, thought and actions are negatively affected in an intermittent, transient or short term situation. • Mental Illness:A health condition that affects the way a person thinks, feels and acts and that causes the person distress and difficulty functioning. The condition is overwhelming to the point where the individual has great difficulty coping with day-to-day activities and maintaining relationships. Symptoms occur for significantly longer periods of time than is the case with a mental health problem.
Systems of Classification of Mental Conditions and Disorders: Categorical Approaches to classifying mental disorders are those that place common symptoms in categories or groups. Examples of categorical approaches are: • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – IV, text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) • The International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD 10).
Underlying Principles of Classification; • Classification Systems allow clinicians and researchers to: • Standardise the description and interpretation of mental disorders – provides clarity and eliminates ambiguity • Provide vocabulary and a clinical shorthand to facilitate communication between professionals • Predict a conditions prognosis (future course) • Consider appropriate treatment • Encourage research into their etiology (cause or origin) • Encompass all known types (of mental disorders). • Serve as an educational tool for teaching psychopathology
DSM-IV-TR Prepared by the APA and regularly revised, the DSM-IV-TR provides a classification of 365 mental disorders in 16 categories. • It also provides criteria sets to help guide the process of differential diagnosis, descriptions of how frequently the disorder occurs in the general population & numerical codes for each disorder for medical record keeping. It does not detail the causes of conditions. • It includes a system of 5 axes or dimensions (Multiaxial System) for assessing all aspects of a patient’s metal and emotional health.
ICD-10 • The major international system for the classification of mental disorders – prepared by the World Health Organisation (WHO). • Chapter 5 covers 300 ‘mental and behavioural disorders’. • The ICD-10 has more general categories using a broad aetiology
Strengths & Limitations of Discrete Categorical Assessment Tools: DSM-IV-TR & ICD-10 Strengths: Limitations: The DSM-IV-TR does not explain the causes of the various psychological disorders. This approach ‘boxes people into one of the available categories, sometimes inappropriately, and it does not accommodate the unique nature of the human condition. These classifications do not account for people who have ‘atypical’ symptoms or those that do not clearly follow the ‘script. Critics claim that categorical systems reduce humans to one-dimensional sources of data rather than encouraging practitioners to treat the whole person. Critics also see these systems as tools for social control – giving mental health professionals control over people’s lives. • A major advantage of classification systems for mental disorders is that inappropriate behaviours can be distinguished from functional ones. • A range of mental disorders are arranged, organised and described in a particular manner and order. Psychologists and other mental health practitioners use these manuals as they provide a common language for therapists, researchers, social agencies and health workers worldwide. This aids diagnosis, selection of appropriate treatments / therapies for the given conditions. • It allows for consistent diagnoses and treatments from hospital to hospital, clinic to clinic, all over the world.
Systems of Classification of Mental Conditions and Disorders: Dimensional Approach: Example: MMPI: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: • The dimensional approach is a method of categorising mental illness where an individual has a profile of scores on different continuums of diagnoses and symptoms. Clinicians grade or rate the severity of the symptoms or disorder by allocating a score or grade on specified dimensions.
Strengths & Limitations of Dimensional Assessment Tools: MMPI etc Strengths: Limitations: In making a diagnosis using the dimensional approach there is much scope for variable judgements on the part of the clinician evaluating or rating the symptom or characteristic – much more inconsistency in its use. The dimensional approach increases the complexity of the communication of the disorder to fellow professionals and the public. Most theorists cannot agree on how many dimensions are required; some say one dimension is enough, while others have identified as many as 33 dimensions. • Dimensional classification does not attempt to place people into discrete, diagnostic categories. Instead, key characteristics are identified upon which all persons can be placed, recognising that mental disorders lie on a continuum with mildly disturbed and normal behaviour, rather than being qualitatively distinct. • The dimensional approach is better able to capture many of the subtleties and complexities of person’s life that are missed within the categorical systems. • The dimensional approach evaluates symptoms not only on their presence, but also on their severity or degree. • The distinction between normal and abnormal is not absolute, but rather a zone where there can be a varying degree of the symptom or characteristic. • Dimensional approach is more nuanced and provides an accurate reflection of the state of a given characteristic or symptom in a person. • It allows sufferers to see improvement in their condition more readily and help to identify which factors have the largest impact on their well-being.
