1 / 18

International Conference

International Conference. Performance Appraisal of Civil Servants : Experience of Moldova Tamara Gheorghita Head of Personnel Policy Division , State Chancellery. Issues addressed. Legal Framework Key Information What is appraised Stakeholders Appraisal Scheme

meadem
Télécharger la présentation

International Conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. International Conference Performance Appraisal of Civil Servants: Experience of Moldova Tamara Gheorghita Head of Personnel Policy Division, State Chancellery

  2. Issues addressed • Legal Framework • Key Information • What is appraised • Stakeholders • Appraisal Scheme • Decisions based on appraisal results • Appraisal Effects • Results in 2009

  3. Legal Framework • Law on the public office and status of civil servant (in effect since 01.01.2009) – main provisions on appraisal • Draft Regulation (Prime Minister Decree ) – performance appraisal procedure

  4. Key Information • Performance Appraisal: • piloted for the first time in2009 • applied to all categories of civil servants, except for those with specific status • replaces attestation • Appraisal of top level management civil servants differs from that of management and executorial civil servants • Performance appraisal is conducted on a yearly basis • Results of performance appraisal can be challenged

  5. What is appraised • Degree to which the individual objectives are achieved based on quantitative and qualitative performance indicators – • 3-5 objectives set in a participatory way • Degree to which professional skills and behaviors, as described in appraisal criteria, are used to achieve objectives – • Appraisal criteria differ depending on the categories of civil servants

  6. Appraisal Criteria for top management / management civil servants 6 managerial competence decision making skills professional skills efficacy and efficiency creativity communication and representation

  7. Appraisal Criteria for executorial civil servants 7 professional skills proactive attitude and initiative efficacy and efficiency quality of work team work skills communication

  8. very good good satisfactory unsatisfactory Appraisal Ratings Work Objectives 50% Appraisal Rating Appraisal Criteria 50%

  9. Stakeholders in Appraisal of top management civil servants de conducere de nivel superior • Top management civil servant • Headof the public authority • Appraisal Commission • Secretariat of Appraisal Commission

  10. Stakeholders in Appraisal of management /executorial civil servants • Management/executorial civil servant • Appraiser – direct manager of the appraised civil servant • Countersigner – direct manager of the appraiser • Headof the public authority • Human Resource Service

  11. Appraisal Scheme

  12. Decisions based on appraisal results • Promoting, maintaining or retrograding on salary steps • Promotion to a higher position • Awarding a higher qualification grade • Dismissal • Training Needs Assessment

  13. Appraisal Effects • Motivation and retaining of good performers • Development of managerial, professional and personal skills of civil servants • Early identification and overcoming of barriers in achieving objectives • Development of a result-driven organizational culture in civil service

  14. Results in 2009 – total, in %

  15. Results in 2009 – by categories, in %

  16. Results in 2009 – CPA/LPA, in %

  17. Activities • Examination • own experience • experience of other countries • Drafting and piloting • positive aspects/achievements • negative aspects/difficulties/challenges • Analysis and lessons learned • own experience • experience of other countries • Improvement • Implementation

  18. Performance Appraisal

More Related