1 / 26

Putting The Pieces Together . . .

Putting The Pieces Together. Sloan-C Conference 2006. DISTANCE LEARNER ENGAGEMENT:. Can Quantum Theory, Psychology, and Neuroscience Play Nicely Together?. Jeff King, Ed.D. Director, Center for Faculty Excellence Kaplan University jking@kaplan.edu. Used by permission. Psych & Ed Psych.

meadow
Télécharger la présentation

Putting The Pieces Together . . .

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Putting The Pieces Together . . .

  2. Sloan-C Conference 2006 DISTANCE LEARNER ENGAGEMENT: Can Quantum Theory, Psychology, and Neuroscience Play Nicely Together? Jeff King, Ed.D. Director, Center for Faculty Excellence Kaplan University jking@kaplan.edu

  3. Used by permission

  4. Psych & Ed Psych Attention as precursor to motivation, then learning Attention as precursor to motivation, then learning MOTIVATION Neuroscience: fMRI & PET Quantum Theory of Mind: Consciousness can “redesign” the brain Neuroplasticity

  5. Used by permission

  6. ANSWERS: B6: Globe has yellow equator C3: Purple-spotted bear is red and green bobble- head is gone C6-D6: Who won that trophy? D5: Someone’s learning his ABCs E1-F1: Hello, Teddy! F3: Nice, new sock, Junior! Used by Permission

  7. Do all your students pay attention to their assignments as closely as you just paid attention? 3×5 card activity . . .

  8. Why don’t they pay attention? • _____________________________ • _____________________________ • _____________________________ • _____________________________ • _____________________________ • _____________________________ • “They aren’t motivated!”

  9. From Smilkstein, We’re Born to Learn, 2003, p. 31

  10. The quantum theory of mind connection to motivation: . . . a quantum-based brain mechanism enables the mental effort that generates “willful focus of attention” which causes brain changes . . . See Schwartz & Begley, 2002, and Lipton, 2005

  11. The brain changes when learning occurs . . . . . . no brain change = no learning, and no learning = no brain change. See Zull, 2002, and Smilkstein, 2003

  12. You must be paying attentionto be motivated.You must be paying attention to learn. “. . . the variable determining whether or not the brain changes is not the sensory input itself, but, crucially, the attentional state . . .” Schwartz & Begley, The Mind & The Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force, 2002

  13. Motivation: The art of getting yourself or others to pay attention to a task or resource.

  14. Things that enable motivation: • Personal relatedness • Autonomy • Sense of accomplishment (competence) Edward Deci

  15. Things that enable motivation: • Incremental self-theory of intelligence and achievement instead of a fixed self-theory ○ focused effort incrementally advances skill, knowledge, & achievement ○ praise for effort, not for “smarts” • Desire to be competent Carol Dweck & others

  16. Things that enable motivation: • Attention • Relevance • Competence • Satisfaction John Keller ARCS Process

  17. Things that enable motivation: • Factor student needs/interests into design • Excite student interest • Organize clearly • Show interest in & support for student learning • Provide good, timely feedback Mike Theall & others

  18. ARCS Model Design Processin Distance Education: Case Study • Scheduled motivational messages sent to entire class at points deemed most appropriate & necessary (pre-planned) • Personal messages sent to individual students when the instructor senses the student needs extra support; personal messages in the form of greeting cards Visser, L (1998): The Development of Motivational Communication in Distance Education Support

  19. Managing Learner Motivation at a Distance: Putting It All Together

  20. Frequent Formative Feedback • Raises achievement – King’s College research shows ¾ standard dev. impvmt. • Feedback is critical as a tool used in incremental theorists’ advancement toward achievement • Feedback is necessary so that learners can feel satisfaction in advancing, both with and without correction

  21. Sense of Accomplishment • Show students their advancement and accomplishment gained through effort – use frequent feedback and point out current status vs. previous status of work • Prompt student reflection on what has been personally learned and achieved

  22. Relevance of Content • Allow flexibility of choice (autonomy) in how to apply learning content/skills to a personally relevant interest, experience, or desire • Relate content to current events in which students are interested • Weave the “facts” into a story (mystery? thriller?) that will engage student interest

  23. Effortful Achievement • “Future-pace” achievement by stressing the inevitability of student progress when moving forward by using feedback • Remind students that personal effort pays the biggest achievement dividends (this applies regardless of the level of achievement when the student enters the class) • Praise for effort, not for intelligence

  24. In groups: • 1.Pick an online class • (30 sec.) • 2. Pick one from: • a. frequent formative • feedback • b. sense of • accomplishment • c. relevance of content • d. effortful achievement • (30 sec.) • 3. Design a motivating • homework assignment • (3 min.) • 4. Share with all • (30 sec each • group?)

  25. Questions and Answers?

  26. Internet Resources (brief, accessible summaries): Rita Smilkstein (learning = brain change): http://www.borntolearn.net/pdf/guidelines.pdf Carol Dweck (self-theories’ impact on motivation): http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/303/303dweck.pdf John Keller (ARCS model for e-learner motivation): http://www.e-learningguru.com/articles/art3_5.htm Edward Deci (intrinsic motivation requirements): http://www.psychologymatters.org/selfdetermin.html Henry Stapp (quantum brain function creates reality) leads to Jeffrey Schwartz collaboration on brain function in motivation: http://www.thymos.com/mind/stapp.html

More Related