1 / 21

A synchronous scheduling service (SSS) for distributed real-time Java

A synchronous scheduling service (SSS) for distributed real-time Java. Pablo Basanta -Val , Iria Estévez -Ayres, Marisol García-Valls , and Luis Almeida mailto:pbasanta@it.uc3m.es.

medea
Télécharger la présentation

A synchronous scheduling service (SSS) for distributed real-time Java

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A synchronous scheduling service (SSS)for distributed real-time Java Pablo Basanta-Val, IriaEstévez-Ayres, Marisol García-Valls, and Luis Almeida mailto:pbasanta@it.uc3m.es †Jornadas de Tiempo Real 2011- Madrid( )Publicado en IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems

  2. Outline • Context and Motivation • FTT and DREQUIEMI integration • SSS (Synchronous Scheduling Service) • Master Slave Model • Choreographies • Choreographies scheduling/scheduler • Architecture and examples • Performance • Conclusion and ongoing work

  3. Context • Java programmers may use two specifications for develop their real-time applications • RTSJ: The Real-Time Specification for Java • DRTSJ: The Distributed Real-Time Specification for Java • DRTSJ has focused on remote object upcalling and abstractions (distributable threads). • But not in a predictable networks • Networks predictability is a requirement JRT-11

  4. In this work • We introduce time-triggered orientation in distributed real-time Java • Basic model used the FTT (Flexible Time-Triggered) protocol • Supported as a new service in distributed real-time Java • SSS (Synchronous Scheduling Service) • We obtain a more predictable network management • Useful for instance in high-integrity applications JRT-11

  5. FTT and DREQUIEMI integration (1/3) JRT-11

  6. FTT and DREQUIEMI integration (2/3) JRT-11

  7. FTT and DREQUIEMI integration (3/3) JRT-11

  8. System overview JRT-11

  9. Choreographies set JRT-11

  10. T and S choreographies JRT-11

  11. C and P choreographies JRT-11

  12. Scheduling Choreographies • Each choreography is modeled as non preemptive task • {O, T, C, D} • The choreographies executed by the master • It runs a NPR-EDF • Simple admission control (T=D) JRT-11

  13. Implementation issues: Convergence Layer JRT-11

  14. Every 10 ms generates a sample Maximum network delay: 20 ms Process data coming from a producer 10 10 producer slave consumer slave Example 1: real-time producer consumer (1/2) JRT-11

  15. Example real-time producer consumer (2/2) Every 10 ms generates a sample Maximum network delay: 20 ms Process data coming from a producer 10 10 consumer slave producer slave master • PC# Produce# producer # CC.dataO= 5ms • T= 10 ms • C= 2 ms • D= 10 ms NPR-EDF • CC # Consume# consumer# • O= 15 ms • T= 10 ms • C= 2 ms • D= 10 ms JRT-11

  16. Master-slave templates Convergence Layer DREQUIEMI J2ME-RMIOP JTime TimesysOs Experiments (1/2)End-to-End costs (us) over 796 MHz-100Mbps JRT-11

  17. Master-slave templates Convergence Layer DREQUIEMI J2ME-RMIOP JTime TimesysOs Experiments (2/2) End-to-End costs (bytes) over 796 MHz-100Mbps JRT-11

  18. Master-slave templates Convergence Layer DREQUIEMI J2ME-RMIOP JTime TimesysOs Jitter [new]time vs. event triggered JRT-11

  19. Conclusions • Developed techniques to include time-triggered orientation in distributed real-time Java • Synchronous Scheduling Service (SSS) • Empirical evidences showed better performance than an ET approach • Because TCP/IP stacks and OS are not fully preemptive JRT-11

  20. Ongoing work • Developing a minimum time-triggered implementation without DREQUIEMI • Ongoing master thesis • Changes in the model • NPR-RMS model vs. NPR-EDF • One way choreographies JRT-11

  21. JRT-11

More Related