1 / 24

Impact of “C” Average Policy on Extracurricular Participation

Impact of “C” Average Policy on Extracurricular Participation. Richland School District One Office of Research & Evaluation August 11, 2004. “C” Average Policy. Adopted January 2000; revised June 2000

medwin
Télécharger la présentation

Impact of “C” Average Policy on Extracurricular Participation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Impact of “C” Average Policyon Extracurricular Participation Richland School District One Office of Research & Evaluation August 11, 2004

  2. “C” Average Policy • Adopted January 2000; revised June 2000 • Participation in extracurricular activities in grades 6-12 is contingent on 2.0 GPA in the preceding semester • 4 year phase in period • 6-7, 9-10 for 2000-2001 • 6-11 for 2001-2002 • 6-12 for 2002-2003

  3. Tracking Extracurricular Activities & GPAs • Student participation in extracurricular activities is recorded in the SASI database • Athletic directors and team sponsors record participation directly into SASI or provide the information to the database specialist • GPAs are stored in SASI, but were calculated by Research & Evaluation for the C-Average Report

  4. August 2004 Report • Examines impact of the policy on athletes • Examines participation in athletics • Reviews athletic participation and GPA data for grades 7 and 8 in middle schools and grades 9-12 in high schools • Students excluded from participation for 2003-2004 are not included in the sports presented • Includes data for 2,131 team participants across 14 sports

  5. Impact of “C” Average Policy • Compliance to the policy for 2004 Spring sports • Ineligibility for 2004 Fall/Winter sports for students in grades 7-11 • Motivation for students to improve their GPAs

  6. Sports Calendar

  7. Number of Students Participating in Spring Sports 2004 with Fall 2003 GPA < 2.0

  8. Number of Students Participating in Spring Sports 2004 with Fall 2003 GPA < 2.0

  9. Compliance • 2% of Spring 2004 athletes (N=18) failed to meet the 2.0 GPA requirement • Out-of-district transfers with GPA < 2.0, but eligible according to SCHSL policy, allowed to participate on probation for one semester • Non-diploma track special education students • Appeals • GPA Errors • Note: Entering 9th graders allowed to participate and given one semester to obtain 2.0 GPA, but this only applies to Fall sports and not Spring sports

  10. Sports Calendar

  11. Spring 2004 GPAs of Students Participating in Fall/Winter Sports 2003 (Grades 7-11) (20%) (31%)

  12. Spring 2004 GPAs of Students Participating in Fall/Winter Sports 2003 (Grades 7-11) Students entering the 6th and 9th grades are allowed to participate and given one semester to obtain the required 2.0 GPA.

  13. Ineligibility • Ineligibility for Fall/Winter 2004 sports • 299 Fall/Winter sport athletes in grades 7-11 had Spring GPAs < 2.0 • Could participate in Fall/Winter 2004 sports if: • enter 9th grade in Fall 2004 • pull up GPA after attending summer school • win an appeal

  14. Motivation • Approximately 18% of Fall/Winter athletes in grades 7-11 had a GPA below 2.0 at the end of the 2003 Fall semester • Of these athletes whose GPAs dropped below 2.0, 35% had pulled their GPAs up to 2.0 by the end of the Spring semester (as compared with 29% of all students in grades 7-12 pulled their GPAs up to 2.0 by the end of the Spring semester)

  15. Richland School District OnePercent of Athletes with Spring GPA < 2.0

  16. Richland School District OnePercent of Students with Spring GPA < 2.0

  17. Richland School District OnePercent of Female Students with Spring GPA < 2.0

  18. Richland School District OnePercent of Male Students with Spring GPA < 2.0

  19. Richland School District OnePercent of Students with Spring GPA < 2.0

  20. Richland School District OneNumber of Middle School Males by Spring GPA

  21. Richland School District OneNumber of High School Males by Spring GPA

  22. Richland School District OneNumber of Middle School Females by Spring GPA

  23. Richland School District OneNumber of High School Females by Spring GPA

  24. Spring Semester GPAs of Athletes • Of the 2,131 middle and high school athletes with GPA data, 18% had GPAs less than 2.0 • The percentage of student athletes with GPAs less than 2.0 was significantly lower than the percentage of all students with GPAs less than 2.0

More Related