1 / 17

A Model of Controllers’ Trust in Others & in the Technology they Use in their Work

Deirdre Bonini Integra S/A Denmark. Trinity College Dublin Ireland. Eurocontrol Experimental Centre France. A Model of Controllers’ Trust in Others & in the Technology they Use in their Work. Presentation. Definition of trust Trust in Air Traffic Control Model of trust

megan-hinton
Télécharger la présentation

A Model of Controllers’ Trust in Others & in the Technology they Use in their Work

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Deirdre Bonini Integra S/A Denmark Trinity College Dublin Ireland Eurocontrol Experimental Centre France A Model of Controllers’ Trust in Others & in the Technology they Use in their Work

  2. Presentation • Definition of trust • Trust in Air Traffic Control • Model of trust • Hypotheses • Method • Results • Conclusion

  3. A Definition of Trust Trust is … • A choice a trustor makes to give the trustee control (e.g. delegate task) • Based on a belief that the trustee will carry out an action / behave in a certain way • With the view of a positive outcome for the trustor

  4. Trust in Air Traffic Control • Why is trust relevant to Air Traffic Control? • A precursor of cooperation (Deutsch, 1958; Baier, 1986; Muir, 1989; Kramer, 2001) • The work of a controller can be seen as a collaboration with colleagues, with pilots through technology, and with technology by using the information it provides • Due to the trend towards controller mobility (standardisation of training) & introduction of technology it is increasingly important to understand how to optimise team work & the use of technology

  5. Developed from: Literature review Observation of controllers at work Three Questionnaires Focus groups One-to-one interviews Three elements: Self Belief Control Model of Trust

  6. Self confidence Confidence in one’s ability to judge others & situation Outlook on the world (i.e. trusting in general or not) both towards others (Zand, 1972) and towards technology (Lee & Moray,1994) Self

  7. Cognitive frameworks used to interpret a situation & anticipate events (e.g. mental models, schemas) Literature & controllers consider competence as relevant in trust decision Rulers/scales to describe competent controllers & technology Belief

  8. Competence Ruler • Rulers for French, Irish, & Italian controllers (competent others & technology) • Example of Italian technology competence ruler

  9. Implicit/explicit rules define, mediate & constrain trustor & trustee co-operation Roles (e.g. an actor’s role defines their behaviour & social interactions) & contracts Choice (need to understand context) Control

  10. Null Hypotheses • Self • No difference between low/high self confidence • No difference (both for others & technology) between low/high trustors • Belief • No difference between low/high competence (for both others & technology) • Control • Cultural differences will be found in trusting behaviour (for both others & technology)

  11. Method • Scenario-based questionnaires • Ten scenarios • Questionnaires; Incident reports; Support of 5 operational experts • Iterative process (both analytical & empirical approach) • Operationally sound; Not specific to one operational environment; Not a test with a right/wrong answer

  12. Participants & Design • Irish (26) • 11 control • 15 experimental condition • Italian (44) • 16 control • 28 experimental condition • Volunteers in 4 control centres

  13. All respondents rated themselves high on self-confidence Towards others most respondents rated high (69-86%) Towards technology Italians low (57%) & Irish high (58%) No significant correlation between attitudes & trust decision Results: Self

  14. Participants under control & exp. condition chose same answer (‘trust’ or ‘no trust’) Both lower & higher characteristics were positive Narratives maybe not neutral? Significant correlation between competence & trustworthiness ratings Results: Belief

  15. Italian & Irish responded differently to 3 scenarios, but no significant difference found “what would change your answer?” Individual differences or cultural differences? Results: Control

  16. Conclusions • No conclusive validation • Should test model components separately (Belief component more than competence) • Need to separate effect of culture versus individual differences (self, belief, & control) • Consider the interaction between controller & technology competence & effect on trust • Relation between ratings of competence & trustworthiness (both others & technology) • Scenarios found to be effective way to interact with controllers • Perhaps follow-up with interview

  17. Questions ?

More Related