1 / 18

The Marshall University Experience with Implementing Project Server 2003 August 9, 2005

The Marshall University Experience with Implementing Project Server 2003 August 9, 2005. Presented by: Chuck Elliott, M.S. Associate Director, Customer Services Marshall University Computing Services Yanzhi Wu, M.B.A. Senior Office Administrator Marshall University IT Administration.

megan
Télécharger la présentation

The Marshall University Experience with Implementing Project Server 2003 August 9, 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Marshall University Experience with Implementing Project Server 2003 August 9, 2005 Presented by: Chuck Elliott, M.S. Associate Director, Customer Services Marshall University Computing Services Yanzhi Wu, M.B.A. Senior Office Administrator Marshall University IT Administration This presentation is online at: www.marshall.edu/it/content/seminar/EPM.htm

  2. Agenda • Introduction • Marshall IT Project Management • Demo • Known problems • Concerns and Challenges • Recommendations • Recommended Online Resources • Conclusion • Q&A, Discussion, and Next Steps West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference 2005

  3. Introduction • The Marshall Environment • A Microsoft Campus • 16,000 students including graduate and medical school • 1100+ faculty and staff • 200 plus departments • 4400+ computers • 4 campuses and numerous satellites West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference 2005

  4. Marshall IT Project Management • Lacking an enterprise project management system, Marshall IT Administration created a centralized repository for project information. • IT Projects Page. • Pros • centralized information store • sharing of information • increased visibility • Cons • difficult to maintain • lack of a centralized comparative view West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference 2005

  5. What do other schools use? • Spreadsheets • Databases • Decentralized project management software • Enterprise project management software • other methods West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference 2005

  6. Demo • Simple project demonstrating the Microsoft EPM solution • Project Plan Development • Enterprise Resource Pool • Enterprise Global template • Publishing a project to Project Server • Project Web Access integration with Outlook • Project Management using Project Server West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference 2005

  7. Known Problems • Outlook integration • Tasks show as appointments, it was designed this way and takes getting used to • Updating tasks in Project Web Access can generate conflicting data in Outlook • Outlook integration may not be best solution • Migrating database to new project server • Requires SQL Server and WSS expertise • Permissions administration • Very important to understand roles and needs West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference 2005

  8. Concerns and Challenges • Enterprise Resource Pool • The larger and more complex the pool, the more resources are required to administer and maintain • Enterprise level Portfolio management, and Resource management, are dependent on standards and consistency • Establishing and enforcing organizational standards • Maintenance of the data, adding new types of data • new people, new skill sets, new coding schemes • Tracking leave, sick-leave, training, travel etc. • Will this be a centralized or dispersed responsibility? West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference 2005

  9. Concerns and Challenges • Enterprise Global template • Allows published projects to use the same custom settings • fields, tables • views, reports • groups, calendars • enterprise-only fields • Better organization-wide reporting and analysis • Standardizes organization breakdown structures • Planning is important • What standards do we need? West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference 2005

  10. Concerns and Challenges • Hardware • Our current single-server environment may support up to 250 users and/or projects • Licensing • An issue mostly for use on non-MU equipment • consultants • third-party team members • Client Access License (CAL) required to use Project Web Access without Project Professional West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference 2005

  11. Concerns and Challenges • Training • Role based is preferred. • Costs – both dollars and staff time • Project Management Office (real or virtual) members should be “expert” at using Project Professional • Project Managers and team members will benefit from training • Just-in-time training for team members • Knowing Project Professional not all that helpful to learning Project Server • Systems Admin skills very helpful on Project Server admin West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference 2005

  12. Concerns and Challenges • Organizational Culture • Effective implementation will require a change in culture (positive ones) • PMs will have to use prescribed calendars, global template, and work within the system • An effective PMO can control and negotiate standards • Performance Analysis • Earned Value analysis – Project supports only Percent Complete and Physical Percent Complete West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference 2005

  13. Recommendations: Implementation • Full implementation • Phased process • Prototype • Test the prototype • Develop training materials • Pilot test • Identify new groups to train and bring into the system • Establish a test environment • Hardware costs • Administration • Testing Plan and staffing • Disaster Recovery • Strategies, planning, backup and recovery testing, hardware costs West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference 2005

  14. Recommendations: PMO • Consider establishing a Project Management Office (real or virtual) with appropriate FTE • Advise executives on project-prioritization • Advise executives on at-risk projects, provide early-warning • Maintain documentation on the environment, policies, and procedures • Administer and coordinate Enterprise Resource Pool and Enterprise Global template • Support Projects and Project Managers • Recommend server configuration changes • Design or assist Executives in the design of Views and Reports • Provide training or training resources West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference 2005

  15. Recommended Online Resources • Webcasts • TechNet Webcast: A Proven Approach for Success: An Introduction to the EPM Workshop Series (Level 200) • Microsoft Executive Circle Webcast: Building a PMO with Microsoft's Enterprise Project Management Solution • Other Microsoft Project Events and Webcasts • Documentation • The Project Server 2003 Resource Kit • Web Pages • Project 2003 Home Page • Enterprise Project Management (EPM) Solution Overview • Planning your EPM Solution implementation • MPA - the Official Industry Association for Microsoft Project • Project Management Institute West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference 2005

  16. Conclusion • Microsoft Project Server 2003 may be a good solution for your environment • It’s not perfect • As a Microsoft Campus, it may be a bargain for Marshall • Project Server environment will continue at Marshall for the foreseeable future • Project management can be successful without high-end project management software • Each organization is different and should consider options West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference 2005

  17. Q&A and Discussion, Next Steps • Q&A and Discussion • Next Steps West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference 2005

  18. Thank You !! This presentation is online at: www.marshall.edu/it/content/seminar/EPM.htm or via e-mail to wu@marshall.edu West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference 2005

More Related