1 / 15

Self-Assessment within a Learner-Prescribed CME/CE Curriculum

Self-Assessment within a Learner-Prescribed CME/CE Curriculum. Destry Sulkes M.D., Vice President, Educational Services Medscape LLC. From We Move: Judy Blazer From Outcomes, Inc.: Mazi Abdolrasulnia, PhD Linda Casebeer, PhD Hamid Doroodchi, MD Nancy Roepke, MBA From Medscape LLC:

melbas
Télécharger la présentation

Self-Assessment within a Learner-Prescribed CME/CE Curriculum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Self-Assessment within a Learner-Prescribed CME/CE Curriculum Destry Sulkes M.D., Vice President, Educational Services Medscape LLC

  2. From We Move: Judy Blazer From Outcomes, Inc.: Mazi Abdolrasulnia, PhD Linda Casebeer, PhD Hamid Doroodchi, MD Nancy Roepke, MBA From Medscape LLC: Martin Irvine, PhD Acknowledgements • We wish to acknowledge the following for their contributions and hard work:

  3. Disclosure This activity was made possible by an unrestricted educational grant from Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

  4. Sometimes things aren’t quite what they seem…

  5. Starting Point • CME has been shown to improve knowledge, skills (cognitive) and attitude1 • Self-assessments have been shown to be inaccurate when not externally informed2 • Feedback from externally informed self-assessments, provided to both clinicians and Faculty, can be used to increase effectiveness of CME3 • Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Jan;(149):1-69. Effectiveness of continuing medical education. Marinopoulos SS, Dorman T, Ratanawongsa N, Wilson LM, Ashar BH, Magaziner JL, Miller RG, Thomas PA, Prokopowicz GP, Qayyum R, Bass EB. • JAMA. 2006 Sep 6;296(9):1094-102. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. • Med Teach. 2008 Mar;30(2):124-45.The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10. Colthart I, Bagnall G, Evans A, Allbutt H, Haig A, Illing J, McKinstry B. NHS Education for Scotland.

  6. Current Model of Online Medical Education • Medical education programs for healthcare professionals are designed using broad needs assessments across target audiences • Individual activities within courses are not typically developed for specific segments of learners • The courses clinicians select to maintain their professional licensure may or may not be appropriate to address gaps in specific individuals’ clinical knowledge, skills and attitude (K/S/A)

  7. Hypothesis for an Externally Informed Self Assessment Learners who participate in an externally informed self-assessment and engage in the corresponding prescribed educational activities are more likely to: • Engage in the educational activities • Enhance their K/S/A relative to those who find the activities in an undirected fashion

  8. Methodology • To address K/S/A gaps identified through a needs assessment of Medscape members, an online CME/CE curriculum of activities was developed in collaboration with We Move and Outcomes Inc • One part of the curriculum is a CME/CE-certified self-assessment activity that measures K/S/A related to recognition, diagnosis, and non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic management of RLS • The online self-assessment provides automated activity recommendations based on the learners’ responses to K/S/A questions • Post-assessments follow each activity to assess the relative efficacy of this new educational approach vs the standard, undirected approach, to improving clinical management of RLS

  9. Course Formats/Titles/Focus * prescribed courses

  10. Curriculum Design

  11. Technical Platform Supporting Individualized Feedback Feedback What: • Each learner receives an email listing the recommended activities based on the question responses provided in the self-assessment. How: • Each night, a script that queries the database for any new self-assessment participants. • The script evaluates each participant’s answer choices and maps the choices to the recommended CME activities. • The data is fed to an email application where it is formatted and sent to each participant with individualized activity recommendations, plus a link to the curriculum page.

  12. Sample immediate feedback / email message

  13. Process Schematic Prescribed Learning: Learner sent recommendation from Externally Informed Self Assessment Automated response directing learner to specific K, S, or A course Post Test A1: Includes mapped Attitude questions from Self Assessment Attitude Course 1 Knowledge Course 1 Post Test K1: Includes mapped Knowledge questions from Self Assessment Learner Undirected Learning: Learner finds curriculum and/or individual activities by standard search criteria Skill Course 1 Post Test S1: Includes mapped Skills questions from Self Assessment

  14. Datasets and Minimums Required for Analysis Prescribed Post Assessment A1 N=~100 Undirected Post Assessment: A N= ~1400 over 7 activities Undirected Post Assessment A1 N=~100 Non-Medscape Membership Baseline Survey: N=400 (Identical to E-I self-assessment) Externally Informed Self-Assessment on Medscape: N=400 (Identical to baseline survey) Undirected Post Assessment: K N= ~1400 over 7 activities Prescribed Post Assessment K1 N=~100 Undirected Post Assessment K1 N=~100 Prescribed Post Assessment S1 N=~100 Undirected Post Assessment S1 N=~100 Undirected Post Assessment: S N= ~1400 over 7 activities Outcomes 1 – Measures the courses prescribed vs. the courses actually completed in a three month time period, click-thru rate of A1/K1/S1 prescriptions that resulted in accessing the activities Outcomes 2 – n=~100; Measures the Prescribed Post Assessment to the E. I. Self Assessment by Knowledge, Skills and Attitude Outcomes 3 – n=~100; Measures the Prescribed Post Assessment to the Baseline Survey by Knowledge, Skills and Attitude Outcomes 4 – n=~100; Measures the Prescribed Post Assessment to the Undirected Post Assessment by Knowledge, Skills and Attitude Outcomes 5 – n=~100; Measures the Undirected Post Assessment (A1, K1, S1) to the Baseline survey by Knowledge, Skills and Attitude Outcomes 6 – n=200; Measures the Undirected Post Assessment (4-10) to the Baseline Survey by Knowledge, Skills, Attitude

  15. Learnings to date… • K/S/A model helpful and could benefit from further refinement incorporating established competencies • Email feedback is somewhat effective, but Medscape learners access activities primarily from their specialty homepage • 65%: specialty homepage • 25%: outbound email with editorial focus (note: different than the prescriptive emails in this initiative) • 10%: external search • Recognition that current CME/CE activity “tagging” for site-location and rotation purposes can be enhanced to include competencies, thus allowing all activities (>3000 in 2007) to be targeted as needed in the future, perhaps on learners’ specialty homepages, and perhaps without explicitly communicating the targeting

More Related