1 / 35

J. Renee Navarro, Pharm D, MD Vice Chancellor Professor of Anesthesia and Perioperative Services

UCSF Office of Diversity and Outreach Campus Climate Survey Results Pharmacy Faculty Council April 2, 2014. J. Renee Navarro, Pharm D, MD Vice Chancellor Professor of Anesthesia and Perioperative Services. Discussion Today. A wareness of high level results.

melinda-hess
Télécharger la présentation

J. Renee Navarro, Pharm D, MD Vice Chancellor Professor of Anesthesia and Perioperative Services

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UCSF Office of Diversity and Outreach Campus Climate Survey ResultsPharmacy Faculty Council April 2, 2014 J. Renee Navarro, Pharm D, MD Vice Chancellor Professor of Anesthesia and Perioperative Services

  2. Discussion Today Awareness of high level results. Input on UCSF next steps and Strategic Initiatives. Future engagement and support for strategic initiatives.

  3. UC Systemwide Climate Survey UC Systemwide survey for students, staff, faculty, post-docs, trainees across 10 campuses, UCOP, LBNL, and Agriculture & Natural Resources. Goal: to collect data related to institutional climate, inclusion and work-life. Largest survey of its kind in the nation – across UC System 104,000 completed 13 location reports, 1 systemwide report, 1 summary report

  4. UC Systemwide Climate Survey • Climate: “the current attitudes, behaviors, and standards of faculty, staff, administrators, and students concerning the level of respect for individual needs, abilities and potential” (Rankin). • Measured by assessment of personal experiences, perceptions and institutional efforts (97 items)

  5. Campus Specific Questions • Each campus had option of adding additional questions to be administered only on their campus. • UCSF Specific Questions: 1) academic pipeline for trainees and graduate students; 2) community involvement/support at UCSF; and 3) faculty use of leave policies outlined in APM.

  6. UCSF Data Collection and Response Rate • UC System – staggered data collection between October 2012 and March 2013. • UCSF first campus – Nov 5, 2012 to Jan 14, 2013. • UCSF highest campus response rate: 47% (n = 9,434) • Faculty: 45% • Staff non-union: 51% • Staff union: 26% • Graduate/Professional Student: 38% • Post-docs: 57% • Trainees: 25%

  7. Survey Sample Fairly Representative ofUCSF Population • Gender • Female: 64% (n = 6030); Male: 35% (n = 3272); Transgender: 0.28% (n = 26); Gender queer: 0.62% (n = 58) • Ethnic/Racial Sample %(compared to UCSF) • African American: 5.6 (5.75) • American Indian/Alaska Native: 1.3 (.45) • Asian: 28.6 (33.9) • Hispanic/Latino: 9.7 (9.9) • Middle eastern/SW Asian, North African: 3.4 (NA) • Pacific Islander: 0.60 (NA) • White: 50.1 (45.1) • Other: 0.68 (NA)

  8. UCSF Sample Demographics • Disability • 16% report • Religion/Spiritual Affiliation • No Affiliation: 44% • Christian: 33% • Multiple Affiliations: 7% • Other (not listed): 6% • Jewish: 4% • Muslim: 1%

  9. UCSF Findings – Strengths • Majority view UCSF as respectful of all groups • Majority think UCSF values diversity • Faculty & staff report access to guidance/advice • Most report classroom climate welcoming based on gender identity and race • Students positive about academics and valued by faculty

  10. UCSF Findings – Strengths • 76% overall view UCSF climate as positive • Students particularly positive about UCSF experience • LGBT overall report positive attitudes and inclusive environment • 72% overall view climate in Dept/School/Work Unit as positive • 82% of students view classroom climate as positive

  11. Comfort with Campus ClimateAll Respondents (N = 9434) “Overall, how comfortable are you with the climate at UCSF?” 76%

  12. UCSF FindingsOpportunities for Improvement • While majority are comfortable with climate at UCSF, variation by group • Most notable differences: • Racial/Ethnic: “Under-represented minority”* less comfortable with overall climate at UCSF & climate in dept/work unitsand classes • Disabled: less comfortable with climate at UCSF, Dept. & classroom • Transgender: least comfortable with climate (n = 26) *“Underrepresented Minority” category includes African American, American Indian/Alaska Native respondents, and Hispanic/Latino respondents.

  13. Overall Comfort by Position Percent (n = 888) (n = 843) (n = 1009) (n = 4404)

  14. Overall Comfort by Sexual Identity Percent (n = 5744) (n = 865)

  15. Overall Comfort by Race/Ethnicity Percent (n = 1584) (n = 3345) (n = 2087)

  16. Overall Comfort by Disability Status Percent (n = 957) (n = 5846)

  17. Overall Comfort by Gender Percent (n = 2599) (n = 4488)

  18. Overall Comfort by Religion Percent (n = 58) (n = 486) (n = 323) (n = 2375) (n = 3124)

  19. Overall Comfort by Military Status Percent (n = 200) (n = 6807)

  20. Department Climate by Position Percent (n = 991) (n = 4135) (n = 849) (n = 823)

  21. Department Climate by Sexual Identity Percent (n = 5450) (n = 848)

  22. Department Climate by Race/Ethnicity Percent (n = 1023) (n = 3210) (n = 2352)

  23. Department Climate by Gender Percent (n = 2459) (n = 4268)

  24. Student Class Comfort by Race/Ethnicity Percent (n = 146) (n = 382) (n = 368)

  25. Student Class Comfort by Gender Percent (n = 338) (n = 577)

  26. Student Class Comfort by Sexual Identity Percent (n = 781) (n = 109)

  27. UCSF FindingsOpportunities for Improvement • Experiencing Non-Inclusive Behavior • 29% report experiencing non-inclusive behavior • 17% of these respondents said the non-inclusive behavior did not interfere with ability to work or learn. • 12% said the behavior interfered with ability to work or learn. • Variation by Position, Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Sexual Identity • Most common reported experiences: • Isolated • Ignored • Intimidated/Bullied

  28. Exclusionary Conduct by Position Percent (n = 235) (n = 287) (n = 262) (n = 1940)

  29. Exclusionary Conduct by Race/Ethnicity Percent (n = 852) (n = 549) (n = 1173)

  30. Exclusionary Conduct by Gender Identity Percent (n = 30) (n = 1874) (n = 16) (n = 789)

  31. Exclusionary Conduct by Sexual Identity Percent (n = 351) (n = 2095)

  32. UCSF FindingsOpportunities for Improvement • Retention: • 43%of faculty seriously considered leaving in the past year • 37% of staff seriously considered leaving in the past year

  33. UC Systemwide Findings Similar to UCSF About ¾ feel comfortable with climate at their location Minority groups less comfortable and more likely to experience exclusionary behavior UC locations more similar than different UC more similar than different to other colleges and universities where survey has been administered

  34. Next Steps at UCSF • Reports released: March Regents meeting • UCSF community involvement: April - September 2014 • Input and ownership from stakeholders and refining data analysis • Qualitative data analysis pending • Community meetings held on all UCSF campuses • Campus priority areasfinalized • Develop campus strategic initiatives and action plans based on survey results (Winter 2014)

  35. Thank you Full Report Available: http://campusclimate.ucop.edu/_common/files/pdf-climate/ucsf-full-report.pdf

More Related