270 likes | 447 Vues
This module focuses on integrating collaboration in family medicine through a biopsychosocial approach. It highlights the importance of understanding both micro and macro psychosocial factors influencing families facing disease and wellness challenges. Students will learn to incorporate relevant data into care interventions, explore family dynamics, and utilize community resources. By engaging with families, participants will enhance their communication and care strategies, ensuring they consider the complexities of chronic illnesses while promoting healthier behaviors and wellness goals.
E N D
FAMILY MEDICINE MODULE Navigating disease and wellness with families thru integration/collaboration using biopsychosocial team-based approach Helen S. Sigua, MD, MHA, BFEF, FPAFP
Criteria for selecting family • Willing to give written ethical consent for longitudinal nurturing • Convenient and safe for visitation, near LEC project site • Residing on a permanent status by way of ownership or evidence of long –term lease • With member with chronic ilnesstrajectory • No member who is alcoholic or physical abuse/violence problem
Family practice interprofessional collaborative practice model
LEARNING COMPETENCY 1 • Given a family in the community, At end of the year, the student must demonstrate an understanding of the micro and macro psychosocial, behavioral, contextual (home & community) factors which influence the family’s manner of navigating disease and wellness. The student is expected to use that understanding to collect and incorporate relevant data into an appropriate care/intervention project addressing the following specific issues:
Specific issues to address: • Forces that affect health-seeking behavior • Effect of family relationships & dynamics on health and illness and vice versa • Complex behavioral change towards health improvement • Age(developmental & normative)-related behaviors • Role of education, economics, school/ workplace environ, social institutions, & leisure on their health • Community resources and public health programs & resources
Learning Competency 2 • Given a family with a sick member in the hospital setting, the student is expected to demonstrate an understanding of the micro and macro biomedical and psychosocial, behavioral, and contextual (hospital/health systems) factors influencing the family’s manner of navigating disease. The student is expected to gather and incorporate data into an appropriate care/intervention plan that addresses the same specific issues as enumerated earlier.
Strategies for family health & wellness intervention • System diagnosis • Community action • Self-efficacy • Patient education • Supportive environments and healthy public policy • Decision-making support
LEARNING TARGETS • Disease in its undifferentiated presentations, and 2 kinds of trajectory acute, chronic • Wellness: promotive
3 E’s • Engaging • Evaluating • Equipping
family engagement process • To apply patient-centered communication skills/techniques and models in establishing rapport and partnership with the families • To get relevant information about both biomedical and psychosocial state of health and all influencing factors using both micro (person & family) and macro (beyond family) lens • To get a glimpse of the family’s structure & function in terms of dynamics, roles, resources, using family systems theory • To integrate professionalism and ethical during encounters • To set and align health & wellness goals with the family
Process & outcome outputs for family engagement process (July 2013) • Documentations of this journey in terms of KII, family conferencing, home visits, oculars, direct observation • Identification of the skills/techniques/models applied on patient-centered communication, facilitation skills, family skills • Accomplished home visit form, pre-FC worksheet, FC process checklist, FC outcome form, family satisfaction survey • Self-reflection
Family evaluation process (September, 2013) • Biomedical---longitudinal care plan with trajectory • Psychosocial • Family assessment tools applied and their outcomes • Meanings derived from the tools • Coming up with a cohesive interpretation of the family in terms of structure & functionality • Sharing and validating with family
Family equipping process (Dec, 2013) • Carrying out your family nurture plan • Outcomes and significant progress of the intervention/care/nurturing process • Measures: qualitative, but not necessarily purely narrative • Conclusions, lessons learned, insights, inspirations
For more in-depth consumption • Insel & Roth. 2012. Wellness Worksheets • Coleman & Newton. 2005. Supporting Self-management in Patients with Chronic Illness • Dilorio, et al. 2002. Motivational Interviewing as Health Promotion. • Arnold, R. 2010 . (Hospital) Critical Care Communication Fundamental Skills. • Kissane et al. 2007. Conducting a Family Meeting. • A BDI Logic Model for working with young Families: a resource kit. http://www.healthyteennetwork.org/index.
Adviser assignments & their contact numbers/emails • Group 1 Sigua 09086429944 , 861-37-11hsigua@gmail.com • Group 2 Dionisio • Group 3 Lazaro • Group 4 Pascual • Group 5 Abrogena • Group 6 Madrigal • Group 7 Josef
toolkit • Sigua’s electronic tool inventory (2012-13), family consent from, logic model worksheet • Sigua’spowerpoint, demo video, family conferencing skills card (2013) • All lectures from yl5 to yl7 • www.fmdrl • other benchmarks & standards we can google along the way that can help us reach our goals & targets
Community Pediatrics rotation • In-vivo processing thru demo return demo of family conference and home visit using 2 families referred to Family Medicine • Pre-FC worksheet after toolwork • Informal but structured and prepared for • Documentations • Tuesdays 1-5 PM
Patient-centered care plan (March, 2014) • Select a case from any hospital , handled by consultants with family-leveraging skills training (list will be provided at that time) • Apply the 3’s as much and as far it can allow you in the short time • Usual case presentation with a patient-centered tweak
Grade Computation Individual Final exam - 20% • 50 mcq • 60 passing Individual Attendance/Punctuality- 10% Group Clinical Performance-70& (360 degree) • Adviser’s grade (40) • Peer grade (20) • Family satisfaction (10)