1 / 29

SDL : MOST point of view CNES / J-F Fronton / D Hallouard LSWT Venice , 30/03-01/04/2009

SDL : MOST point of view CNES / J-F Fronton / D Hallouard LSWT Venice , 30/03-01/04/2009. Inputs. Instrument Flight Operation Plan Today status: all except Sesame, Ptolemy, Cosac IFOP Complementary to Science Objectives doc Merge of the documents and extraction of SDL & LTS requirements.

melora
Télécharger la présentation

SDL : MOST point of view CNES / J-F Fronton / D Hallouard LSWT Venice , 30/03-01/04/2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SDL: MOST point of viewCNES / J-F Fronton / D Hallouard LSWT Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009

  2. Inputs • Instrument Flight Operation Plan • Today status: all except Sesame, Ptolemy, Cosac • IFOP Complementary to Science Objectives doc • Merge of the documents and extraction of SDL & LTS requirements

  3. SDL inputs • SDL requirements • 15 requirements from all instruments except APXS & SD2

  4. SDL inputs • SDL requirements • SDL working group selected the requirements from:- CIVA (orbiter imaging and panoramic)- MUPUS (Calibration and Anchoring measurement)- ROMAP in Slow mode- ROLIS (DIT and DIS)- SESAME (PP, DIM,CASSE)- a total of 12 requirements

  5. SDL requirements chart –First version

  6. METHODOLOGY 1/4 1) Library: • For each instrument creation of sequences based on requirement or LIOR • Each sequence includes one or several tasks • Sequences can be combined to create macro-sequences

  7. METHODOLOGY 2/4 2) Sequence Plan: • Built by assembling sequences • Macroscopic and sequential view of the activities • Association of this plan to a context file • Generation of the final plan

  8. METHODOLOGY 3/4 3) Scenario: • Customizable plan (add, modify, delete) • Each color is a chain : sub-system or experiment • Sequences are displayed in tasks • All boxes and links are configurable

  9. METHODOLOGY 4/4 • Generic scenario:The scenario presents the activities independently of the application context (time, energy source, temperature, data rate, visibilities, day / night cycle) • Context description:- set of applicable parameters- different contexts are induced by landing site, attitude, platform etc … - different contexts can be applied to the same scenario

  10. Used context 1/2 • Scheduling : 11/11/2014 11:30 to 11/11/2014 13:30 (30mn before separation to CIVA-P panoramic data transfer) ---------------- • References dates : -------------------------- ON battery : 11/11/2014 11:30 Separation : 11/11/2014 12:00 Touch Down : 11/11/2014 12:40 • Day / Night cycle : D=N=6h15 Beginning date D0 = 11/11/2014 11:00:00 (1 comet day = 12h30mn equator plan ) ----------------------- • Lander / Orbiter visibility : No Visibility during SDL, Visibility after Touch Down ----------------------------------- . • Energy : ------------ Primary Battery Secondary battery ---------------------- -------------------------- . Initial capacity : 1000 Wh . Initial capacity : 98 Wh . Min Threshold capa : 0 Wh . Min Threshold capa : 0 Wh . Stop threshold capa : NO . Stop threshold capa : NO . Authorized max Power : 210 W . Authorized max Power : 151 W . Optimization’s Power : 0 W . Optimization’s Power : 0 W . Integration’s time : 0 s . Integration’s time : 0 s . Initial temperature : 20°C . Initial temperature : 20°C

  11. Used context 2/2 • Transfer rate to orb : 14Kbits/s --------------------------- • DC/DC Converters efficiency: 50% (TBC) Instruments: LPC ----------------------------------------- • Transfer rate to MM : ---------------------------- Nb EXP priority priority HIGH MM write In Kbits/s 1 1 13 2 1 11 2 2 10 3 1 10 3 2 9 3 3 8 4 1 9 4 2 8 4 3 7 4 4 6 … • Experiment Priority (transfer) :1 - ROMAP ------------------------------------------ 2 - CIVA / ROLIS 3 - MUPUS 4 -SESAME

  12. MOST Process  MOST performs accurately the energy management  MOST needs improvements regarding the data transfers & management (cf. MOST CDMS simulation). Data management is one of the highest constraint (indirect & calculated) with energy and thermal. • Therefore:- result of global planning is not realistic- presentation of results instrument by instrument - energy profiles and quantities - data volume - data transfer duration calculated in view of GRM tests performance

  13. Results by instrument 1) SDL Time Line for ROMAP : Romap SLOW Mode

  14. 1) Power consumption : • Instrument input : ~=1,7W • Converter input : ~=3,5W 2) Total power asked 3) Residual energy : Er~=994Wh Ebus = 4,65Wh for 1h20 Results for Romap

  15. Results by instrument 1) SDL Time Line for MUPUS : mapper mode, calib, anchor M &T

  16. Results for MUPUS 1) Power consumption :map, calib, anchor • Instrument input : ~2; 5; 2W • Converter input: ~4,5; 10; 4W 2) Total power asked 3) Residual energy :Er~=993Wh Ebus ~= 5Wh for 1h

  17. Results by instrument 1) SDL Time Line for SESAME : health check CAS, DIM, PP PP, DIM-AM, PP, DIM-BM, PP, CAS-TM

  18. 1) Power consumption :(HC,PP,DIM-AM,DIM-BM,CAS-TM) • Instrument input : ~0,7; 0,25; 0,1; 0,7W • Converter input : ~1,3; 0,5; 0,2; 1,3W 2) Total power asked 3) Residual energy :Er~=999,7Wh Ebus ~= 0,4Wh for 1h Resultsfor SESAME

  19. Results by instrument 1) SDL Time Line for ROLIS : Dump, DIT, DIS

  20. 1) Power consumption : • Instrument input : ~6(DIT); 8(DIS)W • Converter input : ~12,5(DIT); 16(DIS) 2) Total power asked 3) Residual energy :Er~=993Wh Ebus ~= 8Wh for 40mn Results for ROLIS

  21. Results by instrument 1) SDL Time Line for CIVA-P : Dump, 2CIVA-P, 7CIVA-P

  22. 1) Power consumption : • Instrument input : ~10,5W (Imaging) • Converter input : ~21,5W (Imaging) 2) Total power asked 3) Residual energy : Er~=987Wh Ebus ~= 12.5Wh for 1h26mn Results for CIVA-P

  23. Results by sub-systems 1) SDL Time Line for CDMS, PSS, TCU1, TCU2 :

  24. 1) Power consumption : • Instrument input : ~= 6W • Converter input :~= 12W 2) Total power asked 3) Residual energy :Er~=966Wh Ebus ~= 24 Wh for 2 hours Results for CDMS, PSS,TCU1, TCU2

  25. 1) Power consumption : • Instrument input : ~= 6W • Converter input :~= 12W 2) Total power asked 3) Residual energy :Er~=72Wh Ebus ~= 24 Wh for 2 hours CDMS, PSS,TCU1, TCU2 with secondary battery

  26. CDMS, PSS, TCU1, TCU2 Energy 1/2 1) Theory: • At battery level the total available energy is function of temperature and current. • Primary battery theoretical initial capacity (discharge 56mA, 20°C)= 1491 Wh • Secondary battery theoretical initial capacity (discharge 60mA , 20°C)= 151 Wh • Primary battery theoretical estimated capacity in 2014(capacity lost 10,2%, for discharge current 56mA and 20°C)= 1339 Wh • Secondary battery theoretical estimated capacity in 2014 ( capacity lost 19% and charge at 95%, discharge current 60mA and 20°C) = 116 Wh

  27. T°C -10° 0° 20° Energy Wh Battery 966 Wh Primary 957 Wh 963 Wh Secondary 70,7 Wh 71,2 Wh 71,7 Wh CDMS, PSS, TCU1, TCU2 Energy 2/2 2) Additional tests:Hypothesis: Primary battery Initial capacity: 1000WhSecondary battery Initial capacity: 98Wh Residual energy after SDL discharge in function of temperature

  28. SDL additional results • SDL data volume and transfer duration Priority data rate IM to MM- ROMAP 1 9 Kb/s- CIVA & ROLIS 2 8 Kb/s- MUPUS 3 7 Kb/s - SESAME 4 6 Kb/s Data rate MM to Orbiter: 14 Kb/s

  29. SDL analysis comments • Data management is one of the highest constraint (indirect & calculated) with energy and thermal. • SDL scheduling is very time constraint • Low degree of freedom to optimize energy profile and data transfer periods • All inputs should be re-evaluated in view of the flight data • First study of a long series of iterations with different scenario and contexts (inputs & feedback from scientists)

More Related