1 / 4

Privacy Preserving Electronic Surveillance

This paper from WPES 2003 at Purdue University discusses the motivation for surveillance, related work in the field, building blocks and protocols for privacy protection, and a summary of key findings. The government's interest in monitoring individuals for terrorism prevention, crime detection, and child support collection raises concerns about privacy violations. Centralized data repositories pose risks of total information awareness and excessive scrutiny on all individuals. Explore innovative solutions for balancing surveillance needs with privacy protection.

Télécharger la présentation

Privacy Preserving Electronic Surveillance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Privacy Preserving Electronic Surveillance Keith Frikken and Mikhail Atallah Purdue University October 30, 2003 WPES 2003

  2. Overview • Motivation • Related Work • Building Blocks • Protocols • Summary WPES 2003

  3. Motivation • Government wants to monitor people in order to: • Prevent terrorist acts • Detect criminal behavior (Meth labs etc.) • Catch deadbeat parents • Wide scale monitoring would require widespread collection and sharing of data about individuals WPES 2003

  4. Privacy Problems • Privacy problems • Problematic to bring data into central repositories • i.e. Total Information Awareness • Problem: All individuals are subjected to high level of scrutiny to protect it against small subset of population WPES 2003

More Related