1 / 20

RES 131 Reference Values

RES 131 Reference Values. Reference Values. Interpretation of the values obtained from Pulmonary Function Testing is difficult without a standard for comparison Therefore, reference or normal values have been established for comparison with individual performance. Reference Values.

merritt-koch
Télécharger la présentation

RES 131 Reference Values

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RES 131Reference Values

  2. Reference Values • Interpretation of the values obtained from Pulmonary Function Testing is difficult without a standard for comparison • Therefore, reference or normal values have been established for comparison with individual performance

  3. Reference Values • Studies designed to develop reference values test large numbers of participants with “normal lungs” • Non-smokers • No present or past acute or chronic lung disease. • From the study “Regression Equations” are developed.

  4. Reference Values • If a large group of individuals was tested, who had similar characteristics, The testing values for most participants would fall near the mean value for the group. • Because of normal variations within a population, some of the participants would be higher and some lower.

  5. Reference Values • If the values were plotted on a graph, a bell shaped distribution would be created. • The width of this distribution would be described by its standard deviation.

  6. Reference Values

  7. Reference Values • In interpreting Pulmonary Function values, generally the main concern is whether a patients performance is below the lower limits of normal. • An exception is when interpreting lung volumes in the presences of obstructive disease.

  8. Reference Values • Two methods for comparison of patient performance against reference values • 95% Confidence interval • 80% method

  9. References Values • 95% confidence interval • performance values below the fifth percentile (lowest 5% of reference population) is considered below the expected range (below normal)

  10. Reference Values • Calculation of the 95% confidence interval • Requires the value of SEE (standard error of estimate) from the reference study. • Calculated as : • 1.64 x SEE = 95% CI

  11. Reference Values • Determining the lower limit of normal using the 95% CI • Predicted value (mean of the reference population value) minus the 95% CI (SEE x 1.64)

  12. Reference Values • Example: • predicted value = 4.70 • SEE = 0.74 • 4.70 - (1.64 x 0.74) = 3.49

  13. Reference Values • 80% Method • A simple and commonly used method used to establish limits of normal is the 80% method. • Lower limit of normal equals: • predicted value x .80 • Example: 4.70 x .80 = 3.79

  14. Selecting Reference Values • Two Main Factors to consider: • Population used in the reference study • Methods and instrumentation used in the reference study.

  15. ATS Statement on Predicted Values • Reference values should be bases on data obtained using ATS guidelines • Reference equations should include age and height as independent variables • Reference equations should not be extrapolated for ages or heights beyond the stated range.

  16. ATS Statement on Predicted Values • Should take into account differences in ethnic origins of study population and the patients in the laboratory. • Reference equations should have information to determine the lower limit of normal • Check the study against 20 to 40 healthy subjects in your lab.

  17. Race and Ethnic Considerations • The size of the lungs relative to body size varies with race. • May be due to: • trunk length to height differences, free fat mass, chest dimensions and maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures.

  18. Approaches to Race and Ethnic Differences • Use race specific reference values • not always practical • Application of a correction factor • Have used a 15% reduction for all none white patients in the past • Not a valid method due to vast differences • Current ATS recommendation is a 12% reduction for black patients • Comments in the interpretation

  19. Following Changes Over Time • It is also important to compare patient test results over time. • Comparing changes over time is often more valuable than comparing to reference values

  20. Following Changes Over Time

More Related