1 / 1

Background

Background.

metea
Télécharger la présentation

Background

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Background Therapy for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is based on cholinomimetic agents and noncompetitive antagonist of glutamatergic NMDA receptors which only attenuate AD symptoms. Immunization using Aβ, the use of β- and γ-secretase inhibitors, and GSK3 inhibitors, which are currently among the most promising disease-modifying therapies, should be applied in the early stages of disease when neurodegeneration is not in an advanced stage. Because of it, much effort is dedicated to identify reliable biomarkers to enable an accurate diagnosis of AD. Three main cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of AD, amyloid β1-42 (Aβ1-42), total tau (t-tau), and phosphorylated forms of tau (p-tau) reflect two major neuropathological hallmarks of AD - neurofibrillary tangles and senile plaques. Elevation of p-tau is a consequence of neurofibrillary degeneration and consequent tangles formation in the brain. Beside early diagnostics of AD, determination of CSF biomarkers is necessary for monitoring of potential treatments. Reduced levels of t- and p-tau after treatment with tau-related therapeutics should indicate that a drug is working properly. Precisely, levels of p-tau in CSF should reflect the effectiveness of tau-based therapies that decrease tau protein hyperphosphorylation (GSK3 inhibitors). However, the relationship between the levels of CSF biomarkers and clinical outcome in clinical trials is still not well understood and should be further investigated. In this study we tested if p-tau181 and p-tau231 in CSF could differentiate patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from healthy control with the purpose of predicting MCI progression to AD. Phospho-tau proteins in cerebrospinal fluid as markers oftherapeutic progress in Alzheimer's diseaseMirjana Babić1, Željka Vogrinc2, Nenad Dejanović3, Fran Borovečki4, Goran Šimić1* 1Croatian Institute for BrainResearch, Universityof Zagreb School of Medicine, Croatia2Laboratory for Neurobiochemistry, Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Centre Zagreb , Croatia 3Health Centre Vinkovci , Croatia 4Clinic of Neurology, Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb, Croatia*Correspondence to: gsimic@hiim.hr Methods Results Pre-analytical procedures All patients with suspected dementia were recruited from the University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, underwent complete blood tests including electrolytes, albumin, thyroid function, levels of vitamin B12, VDRL, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and neurological examination. After exclusion of patients with secondary causes of dementia, and after signing the informed consent, patients underwent lumbar puncture between lumbar vertebrae L3/L4 or L4/L5. CSF aliquots of 100 µl were stored at -80oC until analysis. Analytical procedures Levels of p-tau231 and p-tau181 were measured using Innogenetics enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Gent, Belgium), while levels of p-tau231 were determined using Invitrogen ELISA (Camarillo, CA, USA). P-tau181 levels were determined on samples of 13 healthy controls (HC) and 58 patients of which 39 suffered from AD and 19 were in stage of MCI. P-tau231 concentrations were measured in CSF samples of 59 patients (34 with probable AD and 25 with MCI) and 7 HC. Statistical analysis P-tau181 and p-tau231 levels among AD, MCI, and HC were compared using a Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Mann-Whitney U test for pairwise comparisons: p-tau231 p-tau181 χ2=17.317; df=2; p<0.001χ2=23.99; df=2; p<0.001 AD vs MCI - (U=183; Z=-3.712; p<0.001) AD vs MCI - (U=255; Z=-1.914; p=0.056) AD vs HC - (U=81; Z=-0.296; p=0.789) AD vsHC - (U=32.5; Z=-4.671; p<0.001) MCI vs HC - (U=38; Z=-2.806; p=0.004) MCI vs HC - (U=37; Z=-3.320; p=0.001) Cut-off levels were derived from ROC curve analysis, when the sum of specificity and sensitivity was maximized. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 19.0.1 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Boxes represent the median, the 25th and the 75thpercentiles, bars indicate the range of data distribution The asterisks represent extreme values (value more than three box-lengthfrom the 75th/25thpercentile). Boxes represent the median, the 25th and the 75thpercentiles, bars indicate the range of data distribution. Circles representoutliers (values more than 1.5 box-length from the 75th/25thpercentile). The asterisks represent extreme values (value more than three box-lengthfrom the 75th/25thpercentile). Conclusions • Although the follow-up of at least 5 years is needed to assess if defined cut-off levels of CSF p-tau181 and p-tau231 truly predict MCI conversion to AD, phospho-tau proteins greatly increase specificity and sensitivity of AD diagnosis. cut-off (p-tau231) = 1.905U/ml cut-off (p-tau181) = 35.75 pg/ml • Considering the growing number of potential treatments for AD, Croatian Institute for Brain Research with the base of more than 300 CSF samples could participate in future studies of drug response monitoring in patients. Only 1 of 14 MCI patients (7.14%) had increased both p-tau181 and p-tau231, which indicates that this patient could progress to AD. Both p-tau181 and p-tau231 were measured at only 42 patients (16 AD, 14 MCI and 12 HC). ReferencesAcknowledgements This studyis funded by the Croatian Science Foundationgrant no. 09/16 “Detection and trackingof biological markers for early therapeuticintervention in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease”. A. K. Desai, P. Chand, Primary Psychiat., 16 (7) (2009) 40-46. I. Halperin, M. Morelli, A. D. Korczyn, et al., Neurotherapeutics 6 (2009) 128–140. H. Hampel, K. Blennow, L. M. Shaw, et al., Exp Gerontol. 45(1) (2010) 30-40. H. Hampel, G. Wilcock, S. Andrieu, et al. Prog. Neurobiol. 95 (2011) 579–593.

More Related