160 likes | 177 Vues
Learn to defend, challenge, or qualify assertions effectively using ethos, pathos, and logos. Understand logical fallacies to avoid in your argument essays. Enhance your writing with elements like diction, imagery, and syntax.
E N D
The Argument Essay AP English Language and Composition
The Argument Prompt • You will be given a statement, excerpt, quotation, or anecdote and you will be asked to either: • defend, challenge, or qualify the assertion. • support, oppose, or qualify the assertion. • agree with, disagree with, or qualify the assertion.
Argument Prompt continued… • What does it mean to qualify an assertion? • Agree with some and disagree with other parts of the text
How do you argue a point? • Present the issue/situation/problem. • State your assertion/claim/thesis. • Support your claim with facts, details, personal experience, and examples to name a few. • Acknowledge and respond to real or possible opposing views. • Make your final comment or summary of the evidence. • Use ethos, pathos, logos. • Avoid logical fallacies.
Elements of Effective Writing • Diction • Details • Imagery • Tone • Syntax
Modes of Argument • Ethos • Pathos • Logos
Ethos • Establishing your credibility as an author • Citing people with authority to support your argument • Ethics—right/wrong
Pathos • Be careful not to rely solely on appeal to emotion. • It will weaken your argument. • However, used carefully it can be very powerful. • Be sure the emotion contributes to not detracts from the argument.
Logos • Facts or statistics • Personal experience • Authority • Values (can be tricky if you evoke a value your reader doesn’t share)
Patterns of Logic • Inductive reasoning • Drawing conclusions based on evidence • Specific to general • Deductive reasoning • Begins with a basic truth and proceeds (The Declaration of Independence is a good example.) • General to specific
Deductive reasoning • Premise • The truth, right, or belief from which a writer deduces an argument. • The Syllogism • A three-part argument in which the conclusion rests on two premises. • Major premise: All people have hearts. • Minor premise: John is a person. • Conclusion: Therefore, John has a heart.
Logical Fallacies • Non-sequitir • Conclusion that “does not follow” from the premise. • Hasty generalization • Draws a conclusion about an entire group based on insufficient evidence. • Post hoc: attributing false causes • Cites an unrelated event that occurred earlier as the cause of a current situation
More Logical Fallacies • Begging the question • The assertion/premise really remains to be proven. • Circular Reasoning • Restates the premise rather than giving a reason for holding the premise
More Logical Fallacies • Equivocating • Uses vague or ambiguous language to mislead an audience • Ignoring the question • Changing the subject • Jumping to conclusions • Conclusion has not been adequately supported by the evidence • Straw Man • Exaggerating opponents views or only responding to an extreme view
Yes…More Logical Fallacies • Presenting a false dilemma • Posing only two choices without looking at other alternatives • Slippery slope • Censoring pornography will end freedom of the press. • Red Herring • Throwing in a side issue to distract • Attributing guilt by association • Politicians use this. • Ad hominem: attacking the character of opponents
More Logical Fallacies • Appealing to pity • Should never stand alone • Appealing to prejudice • Seen as an attempt to distract the reader • Appealing to tradition • Especially if tradition is the justification for a position • Arguing by analogy • Can be used wrong; need to be careful