1 / 14

Context-Aware Click Modeling

Context-Aware Click Modeling. Mao Jiaxin Tsinghua University. User clicks: An Important Source of Implicit Relevance Feedback. Large volume Easy to collect Informative. However, User Clicks are Biased. Position-bias Higher Position =>Higher CTR ≠ >Higher relevance.

micheal
Télécharger la présentation

Context-Aware Click Modeling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Context-Aware Click Modeling Mao Jiaxin Tsinghua University

  2. User clicks: An Important Source of Implicit Relevance Feedback Large volume Easy to collect Informative

  3. However, User Clicks are Biased Position-bias • Higher Position • =>Higher CTR • ≠>Higher relevance [Lorigo, et al. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 2008]

  4. Click Models Decompose relevance-driven clicks from position-driven clicks • Examine: user reads the result, otherwise • Click: user clicks the result, otherwise • Examination hypothesis:

  5. Validate the Examination Hypothesis Lab experiment • 31 subjects • 25 queries Obtain the ground-truth of E by: • Eye-tracking device • Subjects’ explicit annotations is dependent on the context!

  6. Influence from Context Context when examining a result: • Current query • Previous examined results • Prior clicks Hypothesis: • The user may be distracted by the similar or redundant results in the context [Xiong et al. WSDM’12] • The user’s intention of clicking may be affected by prior clicks [Srikant et al. KDD’10]

  7. Refine P(C|E) Take context factors into consideration Where , is the relevance information to extract and is the context-related features.

  8. Data 15 day click log • 350K queries • 7M training sessions and 3.5M test sessions • For each session, the log only contains the query, the URLs of the results and the clicks Crawled SERPs that covers parts the click log

  9. Context Features Context features: • Number of prior clicks • If the result from the same host has been examined • If the result from the same host has been clicked

  10. Data Analysis on Click log According to linear browsing assumption (cascade model): [Srikant et al. KDD’10]: URLs shown from previously displayed hosts are not favored by users Users favor the same host that they have clicked on

  11. Incorporating with UBM UBM model [Dupret et al.SIGIR’08] • , EM algorithm: E-step: M-step: using Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) to optimize

  12. Predicting the CTR The perplexity (lower is better) on sampled data:

  13. Progress and Plan Progress: • Implement EM+SGD framework Plans • Tune and speed-up the training process • Incorporate with other click models, like DBN, CCM… • Build evaluation set for evaluating relevance estimation performance • Search for other context-related features • Assign different weight vector w to different positions and hosts

  14. Thank you!

More Related