1 / 23

Tracking Degradation

Summary of the Tracking Degradation SuperB workshop in Hawaii on April 21, 2005. Discusses the current operation condition of CDC, degradation of reconstruction efficiency, and electronics upgrade.

michelet
Télécharger la présentation

Tracking Degradation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Tracking Degradation SuperB workshop in Hawaii April 21, 2005 K. Sumisawa (KEK) • current operation condition of CDC. • degradation of recon. efficiency in 3BG. • p+p- • J/yKs • D*D* • Summary.

  2. pedestal Recovery time Electronics Upgrade (Shaper/QT)(2004 Summer) deadtime Q • Installed in layer1-15 • Deadtime~800ns(~1/3) at layer 4-15 t0 t #16 – 49(2.2ms) #4 – 15 (0.8 ms)

  3. Example of J/yKs Event 1 x Bkg 3 x Bkg

  4. current condition of CDC Exp39 MuPair (run139 –220) (2004 autumn) data &MC • cut in track finding • loose drift timing cut width < 1.5ms • pulse height cut p.h. >~0.1MIP loose timing cut p.h. cut both cuts bkg occupancy ~0.8% 3 x bkg occup. =~2.4% track-asso.

  5. B→p+p- recon. Efficiency~high momentum tracking B→p+p- rec. eff (w/ geom. eff.) Single track eff. (square root of left value) MC study 1032/cm2/s MC study 1032/cm2/s For simplicity, assuming relation btw luminosity and BG level is linear: Current CDC config. 130x1032/cm2/s (x1), 260 (x2), 390 (x3) Old CDC config. 90x1032/cm2/s (x1), 450(x5) (reported@HL05(Nov.2004)) No degradation found in high momentum tracking eff. upto x3 BG of that in current operation condition.

  6. analysis code : actually used in physics analysis J/yKs(p+p-) recon. eff. check why we have this degradation.

  7. 1 x BKG 3 x BKG 10.2 MeV 9.2 MeV J/y 2.4 MeV 2.7 MeV Ks 7.1 MeV 7.9 MeV B tail components increase in 3BG

  8. check using J/yKs mass cuts for B, J/y, and Ks are only used. 3BG : eff. loss = 10.2% (1BG : eff. = 52.3%) updated T0 recon. narrow window of drift time. new readout electronics for 2 more layers. eff. loss = 7.3 % (+2.9% gain) use ideal T0 new readout electronics for all layers eff. loss = 6.7 % (+0.6% gain) this gain may be obtained by further updated T0 recon. eff. loss = 4.2 % (+2.9% gain)

  9. effect of track quality • Which effect is larger, track-finding eff. loss or track quality loss ?  Both are large; need to reduce both. • modify finder (now studying) • reject bad hits more effectively. (We start this study) mm pp both both+mass 1x bg 3x bg 3x bg + updates

  10. test a new track-finder for events with lost tracks. It can recover >~half of lost events. We still need time to develop new finder.

  11. example of D*+D*- events 1 x Bkg 3 x Bkg

  12. D*+D*- (both D*(K3p)ps) high multiplicity case loose mass for D0,D*-,and B0 cut are only required. case2 3BG : eff. loss = 32.9% (1BG : eff. = 4.050.14%, 3BG : eff. = 2.720.11%) case1 updated T0 recon. narrow window of drift time. new readout electronics for 2 more layers. case3 eff. loss = 18.7 % (+14.2% gain) new readout electronics for all layers case4 eff. loss = 12.1 % (+6.6% gain)

  13. case1 (1BG) D*D* mass for each cases case2 case3 case4

  14. Summary • for p+p-, no degradation in 3BG. • for J/yKs • Eff. loss (J/yKs)=10.2  7.3% with some updates. • Another 2.6% gain will be obtained if new readout electronics are installed for all layers. • To recover the remaining ~6-7% events, we should improve track-quality as well as finding eff. • It seems the new finder can recover > ~half of lost events. But we need to study more. • We have to improve a fitter in the track-finder for more efficient bad hit rejection (=for better track-quality).  We expect eff. loss (J/yKs) ~ few% soon. • for D*+D*- • Eff. loss (D*+D*-)=32.9%  18.7% with some updates. • tighter timing cuts are effective. • new readout electronics for all layers are also effective (+6.6%gain).

  15. backup

  16. case2 case3

  17. case3 case4

  18. condition of MC study • No L0 sim. • No L4/HadronB req. • Minor bug fix in CDC dead time (Fig) • Same random no.s both for 1 x and 3 x bkg. • event generation, detector simulation: common • 1 x bkg. overlay: common (Fig)  easy to compare results event-by-event.  easy to see small effects (less affected by stat. fluctuation). • A few updates in codes other than track-finder/fitter. • New track-finder. #16 – 49(2.2us) #4 – 15 (0.8 ms)

  19. B→D*(Dps)p recon. Efficiency~slow p tracking B→D*p- rec. eff (w/ geom. eff.) MC study Single track eff. (left value divided by Dp eff.) 1032/cm2/s MC study 1032/cm2/s Since new curl finder and less deadtime S/QT readout are installed in inner 15 layers, slow p reconstruction eff. gets better. For slow p tracking, CDC+SVD2 tracking is scheduled to improve efficiency and resolution.

  20. Results of Eff. Loss, Recovery

  21. J/y(mm)Ks by me Simple cuts: L4 & HadronB -60 < M(mm) - M(J/y) < 36 MeV |M(pp) - M(Ks)| < 16 MeV |M(J/yKs) – M(B)| < 40 MeV J/y(ll)Ks by Miyabayashi (+me) He applied the analysis code actually used in physics analysis Result.; J/yKs(p+p-)

  22. selection of D*D* o generated events B0->D*+D*-; both D*->(K3pi)pi 20000 events o cuts - 17 < theta < 150deg. is required for each decay particle at event generation level (for speed up) - no L4 or HadronBJ cut - mass cuts D-mass cut : nominal +-20 MeV D*-D mass diff cut: nominal +- 5 MeV B0 mass cut : nominal +-45 MeV

More Related