1 / 52

Non-Relativistic Quantum Chromo Dynamics (NRQCD)

Non-Relativistic Quantum Chromo Dynamics (NRQCD). Heavy quark systems as a test of non-perturbative effects in the Standard Model. Victor Haverkort en Tom Boot, 21 oktober 2009. Topics of Today. Motivation for NRQCD NRQCD Philosophy Energy scales in heavy quark systems

Télécharger la présentation

Non-Relativistic Quantum Chromo Dynamics (NRQCD)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Non-Relativistic Quantum Chromo Dynamics (NRQCD) Heavy quark systems as a test of non-perturbative effects in the Standard Model Victor Haverkort en Tom Boot, 21 oktober 2009

  2. Topics of Today • Motivation for NRQCD • NRQCD • Philosophy • Energy scales in heavy quark systems • Non-Relativistic version of the QCD Lagrangian • Components • Power counting; relative importance of components • Origin of the correction terms • Application of NRQCD: Annihilation • Use NRQCD to describe annihilation of heavy quarkonia (charmonium)

  3. : 4 component spinor 1. Motivation • Lagrangian density of QCD • Symmetry group: SU(3) • Looks simple! Don’t forget

  4. 1. Motivation • It´s not! Hmm, maybe not so simple…

  5. 1. Motivation • Standard way of calculating probabilities: Feynman Diagrams • Relies on perturbation theory: expansion in orders of the coupling constant • Very long and difficult calculations if many diagrams have to be taken into account • Method for calculations: Lattice QCD

  6. 1. Motivation • Solution: choose a particular energy region and select only relevant degrees of freedom • Effective Field Theory (EFT) • Is this allowed? Compare results with lattice QCD • NRQCD selects an energy scale at which relativistic degrees of freedom do not appear in leading order terms • No expansion in the coupling constant so all diagrams are included • Therefore we look for non-perturbative effects in the Standard Model

  7. 2a. NRQCD Philosophy • Heavy Quark systems • Bound state of quark-antiquark • For example: Charmonium (or Bottomonium) • What is the scale parameter that selects relevant degrees of freedom? From comparison of hadron masses From the charmonium level scheme

  8. 2a. NRQCD Philosophy • Heavy Quark systems • Bound state of quark-antiquark • For example: Charmonium • What is the scale parameter that selects relevant degrees of freedom? From comparison of hadron masses From the charmonium level scheme

  9. 2b. Energy scales in heavy quark systems • M: heavy quark mass; rest energy • Mv: momentum of the charm quark • Mv2: kinetic energy of the charm quark • Because v<1: Mv2 < M v < M • Now we will discuss these scales in more detail

  10. 2b. Energy scales in heavy quark systems • M: heavy quark mass; rest energy • Processes which happen above this energy M: • Well described by perturbation theory (Why?) • Example: Formation of high energy jets and asymptotically free quarks strong coupling constant vs. energy

  11. 2b. Energy scales in heavy quark systems • Leading order terms in the Lagrangian will have an energy ~ kinetic energy of the bound state • This value is obtained by looking at the splitting between radial excitations • C.f. harmonic oscillator

  12. 2b. Energy scales in heavy quark systems • Momentum • Sets size of the bound state • Heisenberg uncertainty principle

  13. 2b. Energy scales in heavy quark systems • Assume scales to be well separated

  14. 3. Non-Relativistic Version of the QCD Lagrangian • Recipe: • Introduce UV-cut off Λ to separate energy region > M • Excludes explicitly relativistic heavy quarks and gluons and light quarks of order M • Non-relativistic region: • decoupling of quarks-antiquarks • Covariant derivative splits up in time component and spatial component • Result:

  15. 3a. Non-Relativistic Version of the QCD LagrangianLight quarks and gluons Gluon Field Strength Tensor This describes the free gluon field and the free light quark fields

  16. Creates heavy antiquark 2 component spinor Kinetic term Annihilates heavy quark 2 component spinor are the time and space components of 3a. Non-Relativistic Version of the QCD LagrangianHeavy quarks-antiquarks This is just a Schrődinger field theory Reproduce relativistic effects with correction terms

  17. electric color field magnetic color field spin operator 3a. Non-Relativistic Version of the QCD LagrangianCorrection terms • And last but not least • These terms are allowed under the symmetries of QCD • First we will explain the ordering of the Lagrangian • Then we will explain the exact origin of the terms

  18. 3b. Power CountingWavefunction • Dimensionless (probability) • Use Heisenberg to relate momentum to position • So the quark annihilation field scales according to

  19. 3b. Power CountingTime and spatial derivatives • Recall that gives an expectation value for the kinetic energy • And then • From the field equations:

  20. 3b. Power CountingScalar, electric, magnetic field • For the scalar field, the color electric field and the color magnetic field:

  21. 3b. Power CountingExample: 2nd correction term What order is this? How does it compare to the leading order terms?

  22. 3b. Power CountingConclusion • The correction terms are of order and are suppressed by a factor of with respect to the leading order terms • Correction terms are all possible terms but have a more fundamental origin

  23. 3c. Origin of the correction termsKinetic energy correction • First correction term • This is a correction to the energy

  24. 3c. Origin of the correction terms Field interaction corrections • Second and third correction term • Correction to the interaction of a quark with a scalar field • Fourth correction term • Correction to the interaction of a quark with a vector field

  25. Summary • QCD calculations using perturbation theory are hard • For heavy quark systems degrees of freedom can be separated to make calculations simpler • Diagrams up to every order in g are included so we can test non-perturbative effects • We have to add correction terms to maintain correspondence to the full theory

  26. After the break • Annihilation: a process we can describe using an extended version of NRQCD and which can be compared to measurements

  27. Annihilation

  28. Conclusions before the break Until some cut-off energy  we can use NRQCD to describe strong interaction Now can we apply NRQCD to annihilation processes of heavy quarkonia in order to check the theory with experiment?

  29. Overview Goal: Use NRQCD to desribeannihilation of heavy quarkonia (charmonium) Describeannihilation of heavy quarkonia Arguethat we canuse NRQCD Find the contribution order of annihilation Comparewith experiment Conclusions

  30. J/Ψ to light hadrons We need at least 3 gluons Different light hadrons can form Complicated process Example of annihilation light hadrons

  31. Annihilation of heavy quarkonia Process of heavy quarks going into light quarks Light quark - heavy quarks interaction Lagrangian is separated We need an extra correction

  32. What does this correction look like? Can it be nonrelativistic? … this is quite relativistic Annihilation of heavy quarkonia

  33. Annihilation of heavy quarkonia What do we do? Use nice trick, optical theorem: Γ: decay rate, H: heavy hadrons, LH: light hadrons If we know the scattering amplitude of we get the annihilation decay rate of HLH! (1)

  34. Optical theorem from the literature: σ: cross section, k: wavenumber, f: scattering amplitude, f(0) means forward scattering usc: scattered wave ui: incident wave uf: final wave r: distance to scattering centre Optical theorem

  35. Proof: Start with scattering amplitude: l = number of partial wave, Pl = Legendre polynomial al: effect on l’th partial wave, 0 ≤ ηl ≤ 1, amplitude, δl = phase shift ηl=1: elastic, no change in amplitude ηl<1: inelastic We are going to make use of this Optical theorem (2)

  36. Optical theorem We want to calculate the total cross section Differential cross section: For the elastic cross section: using: with δ the delta function

  37. Optical theorem Analogue for the inelastic part: In total: (3)

  38. Optical theorem If we fill in for the scattering amplitude (2), θ=0 (so Pl(1)=1) and take imaginary part: We can identify this with (3): (2) Optical theorem!

  39. Optical theorem We have: If we now use: and (follows from dimension analysis) We get: This corresponds to (1): λ = wavelength Γ=annihilation rate

  40. How do we evaluatewithin NRQCD? First look at annihilation process: Scattering At whatlengthscale does this happen?

  41. Scattering Annihilation is a localprocess (1/M) pgluon = M Trace back the interaction vertex Uncertainty principle tells us:

  42. Scattering Because annihilation is local we need local scattering interactions: 4-fermion operators These have the form:

  43. Scattering On(Λ): local 4-fermion operator fn(Λ): coef. of local operator dn: massscalingdimension n: rank of color tensor Λ: energyscale • Extra correction term: • Scattering is described by • We are interested in the order of contributions • General form:

  44. Scattering gives M6v6so d=6 O has contributions in powers of M and v Mass dimension compensates Example: So dL is proportional to M4 note: Lagrangian density

  45. Scattering Ordering of local operators can be done in mass dimension Lowest order: d=6, all terms allowed are:

  46. Scattering All terms scale as v3 so v compressed wrt Lheavy Similar for d=8 terms: v3 compressed

  47. Scattering This seems more important than Lcorrection But now: Coefficients fn Calculated by setting perturbative QCD equal to NRQCD Have imaginary parts for d=6 and d=8 terms: αs2

  48. Compare to experiment So in theory: Energy splittings (from Lheavy) are order Mv2 Relative contribution of annihilation

  49. For ηc: Γ=27MeV ΔE: 400MeV Γ/ ΔE = 0.07

More Related