html5
1 / 11

Data Over Cable & DOCSIS

Data Over Cable & DOCSIS. Tom Bahnck. Cable Architecture Cable Implementation Cable vs. DSL Cable Modems Cable Television Laboratories DOCSIS System Scope DOCSIS/CableLabs Certified Cable Modems protocol. 5/5/2005. Cable Architecture.

mildredlynch
Télécharger la présentation

Data Over Cable & DOCSIS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Data Over Cable & DOCSIS Tom Bahnck • Cable Architecture • Cable Implementation • Cable vs. DSL • Cable Modems • Cable Television Laboratories • DOCSIS System Scope • DOCSIS/CableLabs Certified Cable Modems protocol 5/5/2005

  2. Cable Architecture • Cable modem at client, cable modem termination system (CMTS) at central office. • Downstream data sent to all users, like Ethernet, but encrypted (DOCSIS). MAC absorbs appropriate packets. • Upstream seen only by CMTS. • Downstream FDMA, upstream TDMA. Reflects volume of data passing in each direction. • TDMA - better for bursty data (requests, commands, DNS). FDMA - better for statistical multiplexing. Architecture Implementation Cable vs. DSL I Cable vs. DSL II Cable Modems CableLabs I CableLabs II DOCSIS Bahnck 5/5/2005

  3. Cable Implementation • TV channels transmitted in 6 MHz bands, in 65 MHz - 850 MHz range. • Data allocated two channels, an upstream and downstream. Upstream bandwidth only 2 MHz, range = 5 - 42 MHz. Downstream range= 42-850 MHz. • Downstream 6 MHz capacity = ~1,000 users, data rate = 30 - 40 Mbps. • Users allocated bandwidth as proportional to total concurrent users. 1 user -> 100% BW, 10 users -> 10%. • Cable providers increase capacity by adding data (6 MHz) channels, segment users to new channels. Architecture Implementation Cable vs. DSL I Cable vs. DSL II Cable Modems CableLabs I CableLabs II DOCSIS Bahnck 5/5/2005

  4. Cable vs. DSL • Cable: No performance loss with increased distance from client to central office. • DSL: Permanently slower transfer rates with increased distance from central office. • Quality of data reception similar to quality of TV channel: Central office designed to boost signal enough at origin in order to reach client intact. • Strength of data transmission set by client modem modulator programmed with distance to central office, adjusts signal accordingly. Architecture Implementation Cable vs. DSL I Cable vs. DSL II Cable Modems CableLabs I CableLabs II DOCSIS Bahnck 5/5/2005

  5. Cable vs. DSL • Peak downstream data rates for basic service (2004): Comcast Cable 3 Mbps, Verizon DSL 1.5 Mbps. • Price (2004): Comcast Cable ~$45, Verizon DSL ~$35. Architecture Implementation Cable vs. DSL I Cable vs. DSL II Cable Modems CableLabs I CableLabs II DOCSIS Bahnck 5/5/2005

  6. Cable Modems • Tuner: Listens for downstream channel, passes data to demodulator. • Demodulator: 64 or 256 QAM. Frames structured in MPEG format for digital set top MPEG stream modulation compatibility. • Modulator: Inverse of demodulator in the upstream. • MAC: Works with CPU to absorb correct packets. • CPU: Motorola PowerPC. Architecture Implementation Cable vs. DSL I Cable vs. DSL II Cable Modems CableLabs I CableLabs II DOCSIS Bahnck 5/5/2005

  7. Cable Television Laboratories • Short CableLabs, R&D consortium for cable telecommunications technology. • Members include Comcast, Time Warner, Cablevision. • Research and document new broadband technology. • Certify data over cable products. • Author specifications. • Own specifications through standardization in ITU in the U.S. • Supported through subscription and certification fees. Architecture Implementation Cable vs. DSL I Cable vs. DSL II Cable Modems CableLabs I CableLabs II DOCSIS Bahnck 5/5/2005

  8. Cable Television Laboratories • Promote cable over ADSL as better broadband, because idle BW is recoverable (statistical multiplexing). • Publish DOCSIS specifications, adopted by most member companies. Architecture Implementation Cable vs. DSL I Cable vs. DSL II Cable Modems CableLabs I CableLabs II DOCSIS Bahnck 5/5/2005

  9. DOCSIS System Scope Active Directory Kerberos Access Token Descriptors EFS Registry CTMS routes client traffic to ISP servers, operates DOCSIS/CableLabs Certified Cable Modems protocol. Source: DOCSIS Set-top Gateway (DSG) Interface Specification Bahnck 5/5/2005

  10. DOCSIS Protocol • DOCSIS: Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification. Also known as CableLabs Certified Cable Modems protocol. • Defines interface for cable modems operating over cable television system networks. • Most cable modems certified in DOCSIS – sell to any cable provider. • DOCSIS 1.0: 1995, widely deployed • DOCSIS 1.1: 2003, security, QoS for VoIP, interactive gaming, etc. • DOCSIS 2.0: 2005, upstream for symmetric services increased- 30 Mbps. [end] Architecture Implementation Cable vs. DSL I Cable vs. DSL II Cable Modems CableLabs I CableLabs II DOCSIS Bahnck 5/5/2005

  11. Sources • Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. Cable Modem/DOCSIS. http://www.cablemodem.com/, various sources. Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., 2000 – 2005. • Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. DOCSIS Set-Top Gateway (DSG) Interface Specification. Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., 2001 – 2005. • Franklin, Curt. How Cable Modems Work. http://computer.howstuffworks.com/cable-modem.htm. HowStuffWorks, Inc., 1998 – 2005. • Lake, Matt. The Promise of More DSL Speed. http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6028_7-5144462-1.html. CNET Networks, Inc., 2004. Bahnck 5/5/2005

More Related