1 / 17

2009 Gallaudet University Climate Survey Results

2009 Gallaudet University Climate Survey Results. Presentation to the Academic Council Dr. Pat Hulsebosch , Executive Director of Academic Quality September 14, 2009. GU Campus Climate Survey. Background Subscales: Themes and patterns Item Analysis: Themes and patterns

mili
Télécharger la présentation

2009 Gallaudet University Climate Survey Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2009 Gallaudet University Climate Survey Results Presentation to the Academic Council Dr. Pat Hulsebosch, Executive Director of Academic Quality September 14, 2009

  2. GU Campus Climate Survey • Background • Subscales: Themes and patterns • Item Analysis: Themes and patterns • Positive and negative climate characteristics • Varying/Distributed • Approximately 1/3 positive, 1/3 negative, 1/3 neutral • Seeming contradictions/Subtle messages in patterns • Action Planning

  3. Background • Annual Campus Climate Survey • Piloted in 2007; Administered in 2008 • SAME Survey administered in 2009 • Consistency • Time needed to consider what changes would be appropriate • Administration • ASL version – Blackboard – 5 problems • Technical problems that were corrected (Active X) • English version - Survey Monkey – 236 responses,

  4. GU CC Survey Results Shared • AAMT – 4/29/09 & 7/8/09 • Units (Unit Action Planning Mtg) – 5/6/09 • University Faculty Senate meeting – 5/7/09 • President’s Advisory Board – May 2009 • Board of Trustees – 5/10/09 • Some sub-scale reporting to the U.S. Department of Education on-site monitoring visit – 6/1/09

  5. GU CC Survey: Suggested for Further Sharing Results • Online (updated Institutional Research website) – Summer 2009 • Linked to Bilingual Website’s Climate Section • On the Green – late Summer - Fall 2009 • Academic Councils – Fall 2009 • Staff Advisory Council – Fall 2009 • Other?

  6. Who responded to the survey?

  7. Response Rate: Percent of total possible* for each role *Total possible” as reported by HR

  8. Comparison of 2008 to 2009 Overall Subscale Scores

  9. Overall Subscale Responses

  10. Subscale Responses by Role: Effect Size*: * Strength of comparison between 2008 and 2009. Useful in showing statistical significance.

  11. GU Campus Climate Survey: Item Analysis • Positive = Agree or Strongly Agree on a positive climate characteristics • Negative =Disagree or Strongly Disagree on a positive climate characteristic OR Agreed or Strongly Agreed on a negative statement (e.g., “Favoritism occurs in the operation of the university.” • Neutral = Neither Agree nor Disagree.

  12. Positive Responses= Official and formal actions taken to convey respect & trust and to share information • Means, frequency and timing of communication (esp., Admin to university); • “The University uses a variety of means to communicate” (77% : 185 out of 241) • Ongoing programs to encourage diversity and respect; • Demonstration of multiculturalism and social justice throughout university; • Access to and accommodations for diverse language users and students with exceptionalities; • Clear statements, policies, and teaching defining academic integrity and ethical behavior; • Statements about academic culture (5 items); • Accountability of unit managers to supervisors.

  13. Negative Responses= Consistency and transparency of decision-making (especially resources); efficiency of the organization • “Favoritism occurs in the operation of the university” • 74% of responses (strongest negative: 178 out of 241) • Transparency and inclusivity of decision making and communication (2-way information flow) • Efficiency of the organizational structure and coordination among units to resolve problems • Security and freedom to express diverse perspectives • Articulation of the concept of bilingualism • Evaluation of ASL and English proficiency

  14. GU CC Survey:Seeming contradictions/Subtle messages in patterns • Respondents were positive about the means, frequency, and timing of communication from University Administration to the community BUT negative about the transparency and reciprocity of the communication and decision making (especially re resource allocation).  

  15. GU Campus Climate Survey: Inconsistency on about one-fourth of Items(i.e., Varied/Distributed= Mixed) • Units use institutional criteria and existing policies to decide(units, student grades, hiring, promotion) (3 items) • Managersare accessible and receptive to subordinates’ input(2 items) • Managers communicate and demonstrate ethical behavior and attitudes; rules of civil behavior modeled and enforced (2 items) • Conflict resolution processes are available • University is proactive in solving problems with community input

  16. Given the data on the GU Campus Climate Survey – What needs to be done to improve campus climate?

  17. GU CCC: Action Planning Q’s • How can we increase the likelihood that formal and official statements and policies be better translated into daily actions?   • How can we increase the transparency, reciprocity, and effectiveness of communication and decision making? How can we increase transparency of resource allocation?  • How can we increase the sense of proactive and efficient problem solving at Gallaudet and make the related decision making transparent in efficient and timely ways?   • What strategies can be used to clarify and utilize consistent assessments of ASL and English proficiencies?

More Related