1 / 9

Focus Areas

Focus Areas. Mainstreaming SAc in public sector Environment Extractive industries Health Education Infrastructure Social welfare. Approach: Focus on a specific program or activity per sector per year. PUBLIC SECTOR Environment, EI, Health, Education, Infrastructure, Social Welfare.

mili
Télécharger la présentation

Focus Areas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Focus Areas • Mainstreaming SAc in public sector • Environment • Extractive industries • Health • Education • Infrastructure • Social welfare

  2. Approach: Focus on a specific program or activity per sector per year PUBLIC SECTOR Environment, EI, Health, Education, Infrastructure, Social Welfare GOVERNMENT (Specific Government Agencies on Envt., EI, etc.) Output: An evaluation of specific public sector using scoring – To what extent is SAc practiced Planning Budgeting Exp. Mgt. Performance Assessment Citizen Groups/ MCG members MCG member Citizen Groups MCG Develop tools for monitoring Build the capacity of CGs

  3. Public sector • SAc in public service delivery • Monitoring how revenues from EI are used for public service delivery (planning, budgeting, expenditure management, performance/scoring) • Scoring tool

  4. MISSION • Creating the mechanism that facilitates citizens’ engagement, advocacy, monitoring and evaluation to mainstream SAc in governance • VISION • Citizen monitors/oversight – accountable governance The foundation for the enabling envt. for SAc established Evaluation mechanism on SAc developed and implemented SAc network expanded at the national level

  5. SAc network expanded and capacitated at the national level • By 2010, the capacity bldg training for network members will have been conducted 2 to 3 times • By 2010, the network members will have studied the experiences and best practices of other ANSA member countries (study tours, workshops, experience-sharing trips) • By 2012, the branches of the network shall have been established in 3 provinces. • By 2013, capacity bldg training shall have been conducted 3X in rural areas. • By 2013, the database of the SAc shall have been created.

  6. The foundation for the enabling policy environment for SAc is advocated • By the end of 2010, the legal envt for SAc will have been identified and assessed. (the data will mainly come from the SAc mapping exercise) • By the end of 2011, the negotiations for creating favorable legal envt shall be reached based on the cooperation of all stakeholders. (includes govt, donor agencies, etc.) • By the end of 2012, the network will have participated in the working group to develop the draft on administrative procedure law to be submitted to parliament for approval.

  7. Evaluation mechanism on SAc developed and implemented • By 2010, SAc criteria and tools and shall have been developed, revised and approved. (who will approve? – MCG with ANSA assistance) MCG’s unique criteria – in the long run, involve the govt • By 2011, 2 to 3 govt agencies shall have been selected and evaluated in terms of SAc according to the criteria (to be discussed by the public) – piloting and benchmarking • By 2012, 5 to 6 focus areas shall have been selected and monitored on SAc practices on an ongoing basis throughout the year. (election year – a potential risk?) • Social accountability index of Mongolia’s govt agencies shall be produced and publicized. (SAc has 2 actors, govt and CGs. Index to assess performance of the 2 actors, not only govt – but here the priority for assessment will be govt.) – focus on govt responsiveness also maybe access to information

More Related