1 / 9

bTagging Issues in t t H(H-> b b)

bTagging Issues in t t H(H-> b b). Lily Asquith 23 Nov 07 ATLAS UCL. The Importance of bTagging. t t H(H->b b ): final state has 4b jets and two light jets Jet-heavy backgrounds swamp the signal, but 4 bjet final states not common. Pre-selection: ttH ttjj

miller
Télécharger la présentation

bTagging Issues in t t H(H-> b b)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. bTagging Issues in ttH(H->bb) Lily Asquith 23 Nov 07 ATLAS UCL

  2. The Importance of bTagging ttH(H->bb): final state has 4b jets and two light jets Jet-heavy backgrounds swamp the signal, but 4 bjet final states not common Pre-selection: ttH ttjj 1 hard lepton +At least 6 jets ~1200 ~850000 At least 4 bTagged jets ~100 ~800 ~10%~0.1% B quarks’ large mass and low CKM matrix elements make it’s lifetime long, giving us the opportunity to identify it using tracking in the Inner Detector ( |eta|<2.5) and ‘bTag’ it. Before pre-selection: signal :background ~ 1:1000

  3. The Importance of bTagging ttH(H->bb): final state has 4b jets and two light jets Jet-heavy backgrounds swamp the signal, but 4 bjet final states not common Pre-selection: ttH ttjj 1 hard lepton +At least 6 jets ~1200 ~850000 At least 4 bTagged jets ~100 ~800 ~10%~0.1% B quarks’ large mass and low CKM matrix elements make it’s lifetime long, giving us the opportunity to identify it using tracking in the Inner Detector ( |eta|<2.5) and ‘bTag’ it. Before pre-selection: signal :background ~ 1:1000

  4. Intro: Impact Parameter bTagging used: ‘IP3D + SV1’ IP3D uses transverse IP a0 and longitudinal IP z0 3d Impact parameter gives probability of being a b versus probability of being a u Impact parameter a0 (z0) a0 / sigma(a0) Weight of track =Pb/Pu Weight(jet) = sum of weights of tracks. No tracks-> weight = - 20.72 Excellent description: http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/686346

  5. Intro: Secondary Vertex bTagging used: ‘IP3D + SV1’ SV1 uses secondary vertex information Uses distance from beam pipe to cut out SVs due to material interaction and K0 and Lambda decays Energy in vertex/ Jet Energy Mass of pcles in SV Number of 2-track vertices + + No SV-> weight = - 1.2 Excellent description: http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/686346

  6. bTagging Efficiency (Numbers for efficiency and rejection are dependant on the choice of bweight cut. These numbers are for a bweight cut of 4) E( b )~ 60% If it’s a b, we will call it a b ~60% of the time R( u,d,s ) ~ 100 If it’s a u,d,s we’ll call it a b ~1% of the time R( c ) ~ 8 If it’s a c, we’ll call it a b ~12% of the time Naively expect both light jets from W to be tagged as bjets roughly 8 % of time, and all 4 bjets to be tagged as a bs (0.6)4: 13% of the time These numbers do not take into account the bias introduced by our pre-selection cuts.

  7. Our bTagging efficiency (These numbers are for events where I have been able to match all 6 quarks (of status 3) to jets within dR <0.2.) 28% of events have at least one jet from the W tagged as a bjet 34% of events have either a light jet or a bjet mistagged Current analysis separates jets into light jets / bjets based on tagging. Light jets only are used for W reconstruction: we scupper our chances of correctly reconstructing the higgs 28% of the time at this point. Want to keep more jets for making W. Would like a more efficient way of deciding which jets should be used to reconstruct W,tops, higgs…

  8. Segregation: to what extent… None: use all jets to try and make a decent hadronic W mass. Use leftovers for tops (lose none) Sort Jets in terms of bweight, exclude highest weighted jets from W reconstruction • exclude top four weighted jets (lose ~27%) • exclude top three weighted jets (lose ~10%) • exclude top two weighted jets (lose ~4%) Aims: To improve significance of channel (more signal events contributing to higgs reconstruction wrt background) To improve higgs mass peak (want to make the Higgs out of the right 2 jets)

  9. To look at: Questions for me: ? Effect of larger collection for W on top reconstruction (play with W mass window) - Marseille showed bjets successful in making a W in mass window 10% of time ? Efficiencies for W, tops, higgs • standard cut-based analysis:(of events passing pre-selection) • 67% hadronic W in mass window • 44% both tops reconstructed • 17% higgs in mass window ? Effect on significance - higgs in mass window correct, incorrect, background -e.g.: currently 17% of pre-selected events have higgs in mass window, but less than half of these use the right pair of bjets

More Related