1 / 36

A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Galactic Gastrophysics Part II John Everett & S nežana Stanimirović (UW Madison)

A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Galactic Gastrophysics Part II John Everett & S nežana Stanimirović (UW Madison). ?. How do we constrain models of the ISM? OR “How do we keep theorists honest?” One important way: By measuring properties and volume filling fraction of ISM phases.

minerva
Télécharger la présentation

A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Galactic Gastrophysics Part II John Everett & S nežana Stanimirović (UW Madison)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Galactic Gastrophysics Part IIJohn Everett & Snežana Stanimirović(UW Madison)

  2. ? • How do we constrain models of the ISM? OR • “How do we keep theorists honest?” • One important way: By measuring properties and volume filling fraction of ISM phases. McKee & Ostriker (1977) de Avillez & Breitscwerdt (2005)

  3. Questions:- Do ISM phases really exist?- How does material transition from one phase to another?- What is the filling factor of CNM and WNM?- How does the filling factor of CNM and WNM vary with interstellar environments and across the Galaxy ?Answer:The Arecibo Millennium++ survey

  4. One important step: The Millennium Survey @ Arecibo • Heiles & Troland (2003): observed 79 continuum sources sources; t=15 min, S>a few Jy. • Systematic, detailed, well-calibrated survey, good statistics. • Statistics of CNM & WNM T, N(HI), and fractions. • Showed that ~50% of WNM is thermally unstable. Heiles & Troland (2003)

  5. One important step: The Millennium Survey @ Arecibo • 60% of HI is WNM. • This is >10x higher than what MO predicts. • Weird, large number of LOSs with no CNM at all!

  6. So, the Millennium Survey … • Statistically emphasized some unexpected properties of the ISM. • And triggered a whole lot of interesting numerical simulations! Importance of MHD turbulence, dynamically triggered phase conversion, an incredible range of scales etc. • But talking about immaturity, have a look at the distribution of Millennium sources….

  7. Millennium survey sources 79 sources: while roughly uniform distribution for l=160-250, very under-sampled distribution of sources elsewhere.

  8. Millennium++ survey sources 1125 sources: uniform distribution over the whole AO sky!

  9. The obvious next step: The Arecibo Millennium ++ survey • There are 1125 continuum sources within the AO sky with S > 1 Jy. • With ~1 hr (on average) per source we would need 1125 hrs of telescope time. • Why only AO? Simply the best for this work based on small beam + amazing sensitivity. Also, extremely well calibrated and understood system. • Single-pixel receiver is fine for this project.

  10. Does the Milky Way need an Environmental Impact Statement? Questions:- What is the structure of the Galaxy’s Halo?- What is the nature of the disk/halo interfaces?- How does matter transition btw phases?- Does matter accrete onto the Galaxy and in what phase?Answer:GALFA-HI ++or Studying gastrophysical processes in the Halo

  11. (On-going) GALFA-HI survey: • 12,734 deg2 @ 3.5’, v=0.2 km/s, • Primarily observing commensally with e-gal & continuum surveys. • Smooth, stream-lined observations, successful combination of data from many • GALFA projects. An important contribution: interfaces btw Halo clouds and Halo GALFA = Galactic Science with ALFA (www.naic.edu/alfa/galfa)

  12. GALFA caught CHVC186+19-114 while breaking up • De-acceleration by ram-pressure • Evidence for low column density fluff. • Part of a larger complex? (Stanimirovic et al. 06) (1018) “Companion cloud”: one of the smallest HVCs, 7’x9’, Ultra Compact HVC (arcmin)

  13. Details of Cloud/Halo Interaction: Peek et al. (2007) Torn-off ‘condensations’ de-accelerated by ram pressure. Again, lots of “fluff” at N(HI)<1019 cm-2 lurking in the Halo. Such level of detail and disruption has not been seen before.

  14. “Fluff” with N(HI)<1018 cm-2 GALFA observations: Peek et al., in preparation

  15. Cloud/Halo Interaction: Theoretical Perspective 10-4 cm-3 10-5 cm-3 Quilis & Moore (2001) GAS ONLY WITH DARK MATTER Ingredients: Halo properties, dark matter, magnetic field, turbulence --- all unknowns. Contrasting observations with simulations can constrain models.

  16. A very special “HVC”: The Magellanic Stream- D = 20 or 60 kpc.- The only gaseous stream we know of. - The closest tidal tail. GALFA-HI image: 1125 deg2 ! (Stanimirovic et al. 07) Putman et al. (2003)

  17. The next steps: • GALFA-HI++: • Observe commensally with 3rd generation e-gal surveys at AO • With ALFALFA++ with t=40 sec/beam finish off the whole AO sky, requires ~3000 hr of AO time. • With AGES++ with t=300 sec/beam cover 3000 deg2 would require 10,000 hrs of AO time. • GALFA-Stream survey: ~1000 deg2, t=300 sec/beam, 3000-4000 hrs required. • More beams would greatly help!

  18. Thank you !

  19. But take a deep look with Arecibo…. • t=1-3 hours/source • 20 additional CNM clouds with ~ a few <1018 cm-2. • Continuation of the usual CNM population? • Changing our ideas about cloud survival, phase transition, interactions. • And curiously, at least one of these cold CNM clouds is <100 pc away! • (Stanimirovic & Heiles 05)

  20. GALFA observations The tip of the Stream:HI integrated intensity • Multiple streams • Lots of small (~6’) compact clouds • To survive must have low column density stuff around them. • OVI interfaces too. Samantha Hoffman, SS, Putman

  21. Note: • Josh’s cloud is a real beauty because it is big with high column density, has such extreme velocity, and therefore makes these rich interface chunks. • But there are so many other clouds with lower velocity and column density. They also interact with the Halo but their “shreds” are at lower column densities we can not detect. To detect them we need a deeper survey. • Simulations predict lots of wispy stuff at a continuous range of col. Densities. Even in the case of Josh’s clouds we are still seeing the peaks of distribution. And those peaks offer a very complicated picture. • Observations show so much irregular stuff, simulations show so much more ordered structure. Very far away! • “Chaff” is at such low N(HI) and pops up all the time --- there is so much lower column density stuff that we are missing with current surveys.

  22. Note: Magellanic Stream is the only gaseous stream we know of around the Milky Way. It is also an incredible tidal structure revealing a huge amount of tidal debris in our close proximity. Real opportunity to investigate tidal tails in detail, we know they are important in other places (e.g. Virgo and dark galaxies connection).

  23. Key questions: 1. What are the processes that govern how galaxies from, work, and evolve? 2. How does the ISM affect galaxy formation? 3. ISM turbulence --- structure formation: 4. Small-scale end of the turbulent spectrum, where does the turbulent spectrum dissipates and how? 5. Do ISM phases exist? What are properties and lifetimes of phase interfaces? How do they evolve? 6. Where is the edge of the Galaxy? 7. Halo interfaces? 8. Small scale structure of the vertical Galactic HI distribution. 5. GLIMPSE follow-up of dark clouds and bubbles (various molecular lines). 6. GLAST follow-up

  24. Potential surveys: • The need to go deeper: GALFA-HI++ = Full AO sky, deep HI survey to study: • cloud/Halo interfaces, • the Magellanic Stream, also • disk/halo interface region. • The need for molecular/magnetic field follow-ups: - GLIMPSE follow-up on dark clouds (magnetic field, and various molecular lines), targeted with many lines. - GLAST: high-latitude clouds • Variability, large monitoring survey: • Small-scale structure • turbulence

  25. How does the ISM affect galaxy formation? • In simulations radiative cooling serves to transfer matter from hot to cold phase, while heat conduction and feedback drive gas in the opposite direction. An ad hoc wind is implemented as the model does not produce winds. Some predictions are ok but the predicted pressure is much higher. • Milky Way as a prototypical disk galaxy.

  26. Or how do you build a disk galaxy? Numerical simulations are reaching the bottle-neck: • Current best galaxy simulations: • Stellar disk is made from the gas disk but quickly, by z=0.9 70% of gas has been converted into stars. • Highly warped disk and unrealistic rotation curve (due to angular momentum transport problem but other problems too). • Essential ingredients for numerical simulations: • Need to resolve the multi-phase ISM in the presence of star formation and feedback (input from massive stars and SNe) • Need to include radiative cooling near SF and Sne regions.

  27. So…. • Got to make partnerships! Sure we need to observe billion galaxies to understand galaxy formation, but we also need to understand key unknowns of the ISM processes.

  28. Why are surveys with Arecibo so special for Galactic science ? A very unique combination: Sensitivity Resolution (3.5’) Full spatial frequency coverage simultaneously AC0 HVC -- LDS AC0 HVC -- GALFA

  29. Don’t think I’ll have time for this. But demonstration of how high velocity resolution is opening a new window in Galactic HI studies is nice. • Questions: • What is the structure of the Galactic disk/halo interface region? • What goes on in the extreme outer parts of the Galaxy?

  30. High latitude HI at 3’: ‘Fingers’ @mild forbidden velocities streaming out of the Gal. Plane b~20 b~12 “low-velocity clouds” b~5 Galactic Plane l~183

  31. A spectacular example of small,compact low-velocity HI clouds at b~18: • size: 4’-12’ • v: 2-4 km/s • Tk < 400 K • N(HI)=2x1019 cm-2 • Vlsr: -20 km/s but “follow” disk HI @ 3’ @ 36’ Too small to be seen in low-res. surveys… Need for high velocity resolution !

  32. Almost continuous distribution of cloudy structure from the disk to the intermediate-velocity gas

  33. Low-velocity clouds are common at different Galactic longitudes l = 34 b = 15 V = -15 km/s Vdev=~15 km/s

  34. Possible mechanisms for maintaining clumpy disk/Halo interface Vdev increases with Rg ! Galactic Fountain (Shapiro & Field 1976, Houck & Bregman 1990). 2. Shell fragmentation (Norman & Ikeuchi 1989). 3.Final stage of the infalling IGM (Maller & Bullock 2004; Kaufmann et al. 2006; Santillan et al. 2007) 4.Photolevitation (Franco et al. 91) Cloud HI mass spectrum can test this Clouds in simulations 100-600 pc Need dust

  35. Halo clouds are most likely a general property of the disk/halo interface h~1500 pc

  36. Summary: • ~60% of the GALFA survey has been completed. • Arecibo’s resolution zooming in on the unexplored interfaces btw the Galactic disk and the halo, as well as HVC/Halo interfaces. • “Cloudy” Galactic disk/halo interface region populated with cold HI clouds in the inner and outer Galaxy. • Evidence for active interaction btw HVCs and the Halo and HVC’s breakup into smaller UCHVCs  opportunity to study Halo properties. • The tip of the Magellanic Stream contains many “mini-HVCs”, most likely, of tidal origin.

More Related