Computational Model of Color Perception and Naming
60 likes | 155 Vues
Explore a computational model of color perception and naming inspired by Berlin and Kay's study of basic colors, adapting statistical pattern recognition to account for boundaries across languages.
Computational Model of Color Perception and Naming
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Color naming • A Computational model of Color Perception and Color Naming, Johann Lammens, Buffalo CS Ph.D. dissertation http://www.cs.buffalo.edu/pub/colornaming/diss/diss.html • Cross language study of Berlin and Kay, 1969 • “Basic colors”
Color naming • “Basic colors” • Meaning not predicted from parts (e.g. blue, yellow, but not bluish) • not subsumed in another color category, (e.g. red but not crimson or scarlet) • can apply to any object (e.g. brown but not blond) • highly meaningful across informants (red but not chartruese)
Color naming • “Basic colors” • Vary with language
Color naming • Berlin and Kay experiment: • Elicit all basic color terms from 329 Munsell chips (40 equally spaced hues x 8 values plus 9 neutral hues • Find best representative • Find boundaries of that term
Color naming • Berlin and Kay experiment: • Representative (“focus” constant across lang’s) • Boundaries vary even across subjects and trials • Lammens fits a linear+sigmoid model to each of R-B B-Y and Brightness data from macaque monkey LGN data of DeValois et. al.(1966) to get a color model. As usual this is two chromatic and one achromatic
Color naming • To account for boundaries Lammens used standard statistical pattern recognition with the feature set determined by the coordinates in his color space defined by macaque LGN opponent responses. • Has some theoretical but no(?) experimental justification for the model.