1 / 30

Major Points to Consider

Major Points to Consider. In order to compare reflectors the support has to be included. Hydroformed reflector cost is mostly material. Tooling cost gets lost in this project. An offset is 16% more area. 12m has not been done before. Previous 6m reflectors were 4.8mm thick, 12m will be 3.0mm.

molly-delgado
Télécharger la présentation

Major Points to Consider

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Major Points to Consider • In order to compare reflectors the support has to be included. • Hydroformed reflector cost is mostly material. • Tooling cost gets lost in this project. • An offset is 16% more area. • 12m has not been done before. • Previous 6m reflectors were 4.8mm thick, 12m will be 3.0mm TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide ‹#› of 27

  2. Hat Creek Assy TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 3 of 27

  3. SKA Assy TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 4 of 27

  4. Direct Unit PriceEasiest to Estimate Direct Fixed Direct Unit Cost Direct Variable Per Unit Total Units Total Unit Cost Engineering Tooling Process development Raw material Incoming freight Direct Labor Consumables Packaging Unit Price TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 5 of 27

  5. Total Unit CostBest for comparison Facilities, Utilities, Rent, Insurance, Management, Purchasing, Training, Repairs, replacement. Direct Unit Cost Indirect Fixed Total Unit Cost Direct Unit Cost Total Units Unit Price TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 6 of 27

  6. Unit PriceHard to Estimate Profits Project Proposals Marketing Investments Shareholder dividends Direct Unit Cost Total Unit Cost Unit Price Total Unit Cost Margin TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 7 of 27

  7. Okay Assumptions First TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 8 of 27

  8. A Peak at Final Results TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide ‹#› of 27

  9. Direct Variable CostsSummarize by Stations TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 10 of 27

  10. Step 1 Detail by Station TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 11 of 27

  11. More Detail by Station TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 12 of 27

  12. More Detail by Station TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 13 of 27

  13. Summary Direct Variable Costs TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 14 of 27

  14. Step 2, Production Rate Needed TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide ‹#› of 27

  15. Step 3, Direct Fixed Costs TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 16 of 27

  16. Final Results Again TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide ‹#› of 27

  17. Reflector & Support TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 18 of 27

  18. Dedicated Facilitymatched to production rate TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 19 of 27

  19. 6 m ATA Primary TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 20 of 27

  20. 6m JPL Symmetric TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 21 of 27

  21. Inspection ATA Secondary TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 22 of 27

  22. Test of Flash Projected Targets TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 23 of 27

  23. John Andersen & First Shipment TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 24 of 27

  24. Surface RMS at 12m ? Mounted with gravity paint 0.36mm 1/20 Previous 6m reflectors were 4.8mm thick, 12m will be 3.0mm Offsets have less curvature

  25. 6m ATA Early TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 26 of 27

  26. Primary 12 TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 27 of 27

  27. 2.4m ATA Early TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 28 of 27

  28. Secondary 12 TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 29 of 27

  29. Primary Reflector CostsJust Beginning to Learn ATA -350 reflector original bid $8,300 at 12% total cost. ATA-42 Most recent price is $19,200 at 25% total cost These are not final confirmed figures. Some of these numbers are guesses. TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 30 of 27

  30. Antenna CostsJust Beginning to Learn ATA -350 reflector original bid $8,300 at 12% total cost. ATA-42 Most recent price is $19,200 at 25% total cost These are not final confirmed figures. Some of these numbers are guesses. TDP AWG meeting, Los Angeles, 2009-05-07 Matt Fleming slide 31 of 27

More Related