1 / 55

Science in Society SiS Work Programme 2010

Science in Society SiS Work Programme 2010. JOHN DENARI IRCSET NCP, Science in Society. Today’s presentation. The Science in Society general aspects …WP 2010 WP 2010 Content …topics details More info. Science in Society. Global aim …

moral
Télécharger la présentation

Science in Society SiS Work Programme 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Science in Society SiS Work Programme 2010 JOHN DENARI IRCSET NCP, Science in Society

  2. Today’s presentation • The Science in Society general aspects …WP 2010 • WP 2010 Content …topics details • More info

  3. Science in Society Global aim … contribute to an open, effective and democratic European knowledge-based society by • Embedding SiS in ERA • Matching S&T policies with Societal needs • Creating and developing capacities

  4. Work Programmes 2007 - 2010: Follow the action lines of the Science in SocietySpecific Programme adopted in 2006 Set out the actions to be undertaken during the year Progression in total budget: 2007: € 29.9 million (21.8 for the calls for proposals) 2008 : € 41 million (29.9 for the calls) 2009: € 34.5 million (31.8 for the calls) 2010: € 51.5 million (46.6 for the calls) Science in SocietyWork Programmes 2007 - 2010

  5. SiS 2010 and beyond New approach Ensuring a strong SiS dimension in ERA Towards more focused and structured actions, with greater EU added value, wider impact and wider range of key actors /stakeholders Give a better visibility at EU level, accessibility of the programme mobilisation of new stakeholders…

  6. Science in Society Key actors …more engagement and focus

  7. Work Programme 2010Main focus Greater research component Broader public engagement -> Mobilisation More focused work on ethics Measuring and evaluating research quality Engaging with and modernising universities Science Education -> teacher training, and reinforcing links between science education and careers Gender and Research -> structural change Communication -> Experimentation Science and the Arts l

  8. Work Programme 2010 Structure 3 action lines 7 activities +1 More dynamic GOVERNANCE of S&S relationship Role of univ 5.1.4 Place of S&T in society 5.1.1 Science system, codes, expertise 5.1.3 Broader engagement science issues 5.1.2 MML actions 5.1.0 Strengthening POTENTIAL broadening HORIZONS Gender and research 5.2.1 Young people and science education 5.2.2 Science & Society COMMUNICATE Two-way communication of science and the public, and role of the media 5.3.

  9. Different calls , different budgets, different funding schemes, different deadlines: SiS-2010-1 SiS-2010-CAREERS SiS-2010-UNIVERSITIES Read the call text call fiches Guide for applicants check eligiblity criteria WP 2010 implementation SiS calls

  10. Work Programme 2010 Call content 3 action lines 7 activities +1 More dynamic GOVERNANCE of S&S relationship MML actions 5.1.0 Strengthening POTENTIAL broadening HORIZONS Science & Society COMMUNICATE

  11. 1.0-1 Mobilisation & Mutual Learning • New initiative of Science in Society: topic SiS-2010 1.0-1 • Mobilisation of wide range of actors engaged in long term partnerships to design and implement actions on themes of interest for society- where research is at stake • Themes treated by incorporating Science in Society actions into research strategies/planning • Mutual learning between partners Viviane Willis-Mazzichi, L4

  12. WHAT is NEW with MML? PARTNERSHIPS: At least threedifferent types of actors engaged as partners in the proposal consortium

  13. 1.0-1 What is new with MML? • MML ACTION PLANS : jointdesign and implementation • = coherent series of activities which precede, accompany or follow research and contribute to integrate it in society- cf. topic • THEMES : MML structured around a bottom-up subject/theme • TRANSVERSALITY : addressing a set of SiS issues: gender, education, public engagement, scientific culture, ethics, communication, evidence-based policy-making • MUTUAL LEARNING between participants with different knowledge and experience Viviane Willis-Mazzichi, L4

  14. 1.0-1 MMLAPs Specific Provisions • 4 years duration • at least 10 legal entities in 10 different countries - eligibility criterion • CSA (Supporting) – research as such not funded; non exhaustive list of possible activities in the topic description • Budget : € 16, 5 million- max.4 proposals Viviane Willis-Mazzichi, L4

  15. 1.0-1 MML Expected impacts • Knowledge sharing, Democratisation of research policy, European added-value • Promote an open, effective and democratic EU knowledge society • Improved mobilisation of research organisations and other actors, incl. civil society actors, to engage in science in society actions • Improved use of scientific knowledge in policy-making • Incorporate science in society actions into research systems • Improved transnational cooperation in science in society domains; • Wider benefits across Europe beyond those accruing directly to project participants. Viviane Willis-Mazzichi, L4

  16. Work Programme 2010 Content 3 action lines 7 activities +1 More dynamic GOVERNANCE of S&S relationship Place of S&T in society 5.1.1 Strengthening POTENTIAL broadening HORIZONS Science & Society COMMUNICATE

  17. 1.1.1-1 Ethics – EU Global Actor Objectives Address specific global aspects of ERA: convergence/divergence of ethical/regulatory standards for scientific conduct- more concerted action among MS at global level Conditions CP, International participation is encouraged. Budget € 1,5 Million, (eligibility criterion), at least one project will be funded René von Schomberg, L3

  18. 1.1.1-1 Ethics – EU Global Actor Activities Workshops on Global Governance of Science: outputs will flow into new issues for research Impact Better insights on how to use ethical expertise for improving the global governance of science. René von Schomberg, L3

  19. 1.1.1-2 Ethics – EU Policy in the Making Objectives Which type of ethical expertise needed for EU policy? How should this expertise be governed? Conditions CP, International participation is encouraged. Budget € 1,5 Million, (eligibility criterium), at least one project will be funded René von Schomberg, L3

  20. 1.1.1-2 Ethics – EU Policy in the Making Activities Focus on Human Enhancement as example: Sport Cooperation with DG EAC on antidoping policies Impact Better use of ethical expertise in policy making process René von Schomberg, L3

  21. Work Programme 2010 Structure 3 action lines 7 activities +1 More dynamic GOVERNANCE of S&S relationship Science system, codes, expertise 5.1.3 Strengthening POTENTIAL broadening HORIZONS Science & Society COMMUNICATE

  22. 1.3.3-1, Research Outputs Jean-François Dechamp, L3

  23. 1.3.3-1, Research Outputs Activities, such as: - Analysis of current peer review system - Study and propose alternative to ways of measuring productivity and performance of researchers - Conceptualization of incentive schemes for researchers - Gender dimension in relation to evaluation and performance Impact - Provide insight into the dynamics of the European science & research system and the ways research outputs - at researcher level - are measured & evaluated - Conduct analysis leading to policy solutions in order to improve the governance of European research & innovation system Jean-François Dechamp, L3

  24. Work Programme 2010 Content 3 action lines 7 activities +1 More dynamic GOVERNANCE of S&S relationship Role of univ. 5.1.4 Strengthening POTENTIAL broadening HORIZONS Science & Society COMMUNICATE

  25. Universities The evolving role of universities Objectives Modernise European universities to become more competitive in the delivery of their interlinked missions of education, research and other outreach activities. Conditions € 3 500 000 available for 3 calls Adeline Kroll, C4

  26. 1.4-1, Universities SiS-2010-1.4-1 Operational phase of the Data Collection Network on research-intensive universities providing full data collection services, CSA (Public Procurement) € 800 000 12 months Impact To provide a set of comparable data on research performance and other outreach activities of European universities Adeline Kroll, C4

  27. SiS-2010-1.4-2 The role of universities in the process towards a knowledge-based society, CSA (Supporting) € 2 500 000 (600 000 per project, max of 5 projects, deadline for application earlier than most calls) Impact To strengthen the role of universities in the building of the knowledge-based society, to reinforce universities’ s governance and management structures, partnerships with businesses and civil society, foster creation of networks between universities. 1.4-2, Universities Adeline Kroll, C4

  28. SiS-2010-1.4-3 Study on the evolving role of universities in the production, diffusion and use of knowledge, CSA (Public Procurement under Social Science and Humanities FC) € 200 000 Impact To understand contribution of universities in the development of the knowledge-society and monitor the reform of the national frameworks affecting research quality of universities. 1.4-3, Universities

  29. Work Programme 2010 Content 3 action lines 7 activities +1 More dynamic GOVERNANCE of S&S relationship Strengthening POTENTIAL broadening HORIZONS Gender and research 5.2.1 Science & Society COMMUNICATE

  30. 2.1.1-1, Gender Structural Change Objectives Increase the participation and role of women researchers by modernizing the management and working culture of research institutions Conditions • CSA (Supporting) • Min. 3 independent entities, from 3 different MS-AC-CA • Duration: 3 -5 years • Budget € 4.5 million for 2 proposals • EC contribution will cover only 70% of total costs (research institution managers commit themselves to the change by allocating resources) Marina Marchetti , L4

  31. 2.1.1-1, Gender Structural Change Activities Propose and implement tailored action plan, including transparent recruitment/promotion procedures; update assessment standards for research and management; course content development from a gendered point of view; dual career couple policies; women in leadership policies, etc. Impact To start a process of modernization of Human Resources management in research Marina Marchetti, L4

  32. 2.1.3-1, Gender Euro-Mediterranean Cooperation Objectives Increase knowledge on the situation of women in science, engineering, and technology (SET) in the Mediterranean Partner Countries (MPCs). Conditions • SICA-CP : 2 entities from two different MS or AC + 2 entities from 2 different ICPC Mediterranean Partner Countries • Budget: € 2 million (1 proposal) analyzing all the ICPC Mediterranean Partner Countries: Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Palestinian-administered area, Syria and Tunisia. Marina Marchetti, L4

  33. 2.1.3-1, Gender Euro-Mediterranean Cooperation Activities Data collection, state of the art analysis, closing knowledge gaps on horizontal and vertical segregation for women’s careers in SET; their causes and effects; national legislation and policies to counterbalance these effects; survey of main stakeholders involved, in each country, in the equal opportunities process. Impact Deepen the knowledge and prepare background information for future policy-making at national level and in EU cooperation policy or programs. Marina Marchetti, L4

  34. Work Programme 2010 Content 3 action lines 7 activities +1 More dynamic GOVERNANCE of S&S relationship Strengthening POTENTIAL broadening HORIZONS Young people and science education 5.2.2 Science & Society COMMUNICATE

  35. 2.2.1-1, Education Teacher Training Objectives • Promote a more widespread use of problem and inquiry-based science teaching (IBSE) techniques in primary and secondary schools • Bridge the gap between the science education research community, science teachers and local actors • Complement school science education curricula • Focus on teacher training and promotion of European teachers’ networks Conditions • CSA (Supporting): min. 10 independent legal entities from 10 MS or AC • Minimum requested EC contribution: € 2 000 000 • Minimum project duration: 3 years • 3 proposals maximum will be funded • Projects will contribute to the Internet Platform Monica Menapace, L4

  36. 2.2.1-1, Education Teacher Training Activities • Securing basic knowledge, a task culture, learning from mistakes, cumulative and autonomous learning, interdisciplinary approaches and attention to differences between boys’ and girls’ interests • Actions shall already have proven their efficiency and efficacy • Must be realistic and feasible in terms of teachers’ participation • Open to participation of entities seeking to gain experience on IBSE Impact • Change the way science is taught in schools in Europe • Significant benefits across Europe beyond project participants • Long-term impact: increase the number of young people taking up science careers in Europe and increase knowledge in science among younger generations Monica Menapace, L4

  37. 2.2.2-1, Education S&T Careers Objectives • Improve awareness on Science & Technology careers diversity at key times when choices are made on study subjects (through information and first-hand experiences) • Challenge stereotypical images of working in science, with special attention to girls and disadvantaged groups • Involve industry, research organizations and other appropriate bodies Conditions • CSA (Supporting): minimum 3 independent legal entities from 3 MS or AC. Involvement of actors from at least 10 MS or AC • EC contribution will not exceed 50% of the total eligible costs • Indicative budget: € 4 million • Independent evaluation Monica Menapace, L4

  38. 2.2.2-1, Education S&T Careers Activities • Description of current state of play • Action plan of joint activities involving relevant stakeholders • Implementation of pilot activities: demonstration activities, face to face meetings ambassadors and mentorship schemes), out-reach activities, career showcasing, joint activities and partnership, dissemination and awareness activities … • Involvement of wide range of actors and stakeholders: employers, teachers, parents, career advisory services … • Benefits across Europe beyond participants to the project Impact • Increase number of young people studying science, math and technology Monica Menapace, L4

  39. 2.2.3-1, Education Science Curricula Objective • Better understand the objectives, content and practices related to science and maths curricula Conditions • CP (small or medium scale focused research project) • EC contribution shall not exceed € 1.500.000 • Maximum 1 project will be funded • Additional evaluation criterion: “appropriate comparative perspective in relation to the proposed research” Monica Menapace, L4

  40. 2.2.3-1, Education Science Curricula Activities • Compare and contrast objectives of science and mathematics curricula in a representative number of MS and AS. • Check compatibility of proposed curricula content/teaching practices with the above mentioned objectives • Take into account students perceptions of the objectives of science education and their views and aspirations • Disseminate research results to appropriate stakeholders including policy makers Impact • Research results will stimulate a debate among policy makers on science and maths education objectives and related actual practices and content Monica Menapace, L4

  41. Work Programme 2010 Content 3 action lines 7 activities +1 More dynamic GOVERNANCE of S&S relationship Strengthening POTENTIAL broadening HORIZONS Science & Society COMMUNICATE Two-way communication of science and the public, and role of the media 5.3.

  42. 3.0.3-1 Science and the Arts Objectives • Increase thescience and society dialogue (towards a larger audience, especially “hard to reach groups”) via the arts • Analyse/highlight the cross-fertilization between science and the arts Conditions • CSA (Supporting) • 3 different legal entities from 3 different EU MS or AS • Proposed activities must take place in at least 10 MS or AC • Indicative Budget: € 2.5 million • Envisaged max. 2 proposals • Multi-actors consortium Raffaella Di Iorio, L4

  43. 3.0.3-1 Science and the Arts Activities • Effective actions to promote a closer science and society cooperation via artistic expression • Actions to highlight the communalities (such as creativity) between science and the arts • Importance of the scientific accuracy Impact • Foster better cooperation between science and the arts • Broaden the public's perception, knowledge and understanding of science and of scientific breakthroughs. (edutainment) • Highlight the creativity aspects in science • Strengthen the links with innovation • Reinforce the notion of scientific culture Raffaella Di Iorio, L4

  44. Key Dates for WP2010 Call publication: 30 July 2009 http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/dc/index.cfm Register early in the EPSS! Deadline: 21 January 2010 - Universities – 2 December ! Evaluation: March-April 2010 Negotiations: June-July 2010 Contracts signed: from September 2010

  45. Relevant Websites • SCIENCE IN SOCIETYPORTAL http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/home_en.cfm • SCIENCE AND SOCIETY in FP7 – CORDIS WEBSITE http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/capacities/science-society_en.html • Find previous projects and partners http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/index.cfm?fuseaction=public.topic&id=66 • EVALUATORS, please (re)-register at:https://cordis.europa.eu/emmfp7/index.cfm?fuseaction=wel.welcome

  46. Science in Society Call FP7-SiS-2009-1 Results

  47. Call Timeline • Call published: 3 Sept. 2008 to 13 Jan. 2009 • Remote evaluation: from 7 to 22 February • Brussels evaluation: from 9 to 13 March • Negotiation Letters: 28 May 2009 • Negotiation meeting with Coordinators: 30 June • First GPF + Annex 1 submission: 24 June • Intended close of negotiation: 21 September

  48. Received proposals • 101 proposals submitted • 1 proposal transferred to SSH-2009-1 call • 1 proposal withdrew from further evaluation • 3 proposals ineligible • 96 proposals evaluated • 15 proposals to be funded • 10 proposals on reserve list

  49. WP coverage – Call for proposals only 9 Topics over 7 Activities Action Lines (3) Broader engagement Science issues 5.1.2 (1) Science system, codes, expertise 5.1.3 (1) More dynamic GOVERNANCE of S&S relationship Place of S&T in society 5.1.1 (2) Role of the universities 5.1.4 Strengthening POTENTIAL broadening HORIZONS Young people and science education 5.2.2 (2) Gender and research 5.2.1 (2) Science & Society COMMUNICATE Two-way communication of science and the public, and role of the media 5.3 (1)

  50. Overall Result

More Related