530 likes | 677 Vues
This article explores the intricacies of redistricting ahead of the 2012 elections, highlighting the strategic implications for political parties and incumbents. It discusses key observations and terminology related to redistricting, such as merged pairs and the impact of demographic realities. The analysis emphasizes that the political landscape is ever-changing, with incumbents facing new challenges in reshaped districts. Furthermore, it identifies the significance of Hispanic voters and the shifts needed for the GOP's success in swing states.
E N D
Redistricting And The 2012 Election Bernadette BuddeSenior Vice President, Political AnalysisMichael DavisVice President, Political Programs July 13, 2011
BAB’S PRINCIPLES • It never turns out exactly as the party operatives think • Ten years is a very long time (3 presidential elections) • This version feels less partisan than ‘70/’80/’90/2000 • Incumbents serve in current districts (decide on your grassroots strategy) • Incumbents run in new districts (decide on your PAC strategy) • Demographic reality outweighs lines • None of this makes the issues go away
BAB’S TERMINOLOGY • Merged pairs • Two incumbents running against each other • In primary: example, LA-3 Boustany (R) and Landry (R) – eliminates one seat for the party regardless of primary winner • In general: example, IA-3 Boswell (D) and Latham (R) – eliminates one seat for the party losing the general election • Seats without incumbents where a freshman will be elected • Consequences of redistricting • Added seat: example, TX gains four seats • Redistricted hole: example, “gaps” where an incumbent could have run but due to district realignment decides not to run; usually occurs in states losing seats (such as IL) or not gaining seats (such as CA) • Traditional open seats • Incumbent lost in primary to a challenger • Incumbent runs for another office: example IN-6 Pence (R) • Incumbent not seeking reelection: example OK-2 Boren (D)
BAB’S TERMINOLOGY (cont.) • Don’t make yourself crazy • If you don’t keep track yourself, find a source you feel is reliable and stick with that source; every pundit will label and then tally in a slightly different way. • In the end, there are only 435 districts. If your list of plus/minus doesn’t add up to 435, the list is wrong. • We don’t know the partisan impact of redistricting until we know the outcome of all general elections • Easiest way to get House to add back up to 435 is to count victories for one party as they occur • Tabulate the number of seats gained or lost for one party with a baseline of where each party began going into election night
FOR GOP TO WIN WHITE HOUSE IN 2012, THE GOP NEEDS TO WIN THE FOLLOWING STATES(ORDERED BY 2008 MAP,OBAMA WIN %)
TEXAS GOES DEMOCRAT IN 2020(ORDERED BY 2008 MAP,OBAMA WIN %)
EXPECTED PARTISAN CHANGE-3 REP / +6 DEM (As of July 13, 2011)
OLD - 2001 AR CD MAP NEW - 2011 AR CD MAP
OLD – 2001 CD MAP NEW – 2011 CD MAP
OLD – 2001 IN CD MAP NEW - 2011 IN CD MAP
OLD – 2001 IA CD MAP NEW – 2011 IA CD MAP
OLD – 2001 LA CD MAP NEW – 2011 LA CD MAP LA-03 MAP
OLD – 2001 MO CD MAP NEW – 2011 MO CD MAP
OLD – 2001 NE CD MAP NEW – 2011 NE CD MAP
OLD – 2001 OK CD MAP NEW – 2011 OK CD MAP