1 / 11

UK Electronics Status and Issues

UK Electronics Status and Issues. Paul Dauncey Imperial College London. UK approval. UK electronics project (finally!) approved in Dec 2002 Full equipment request, but only for ECAL electronics Full manpower request for engineering effort from Rutherford Laboratory (RAL)

morela
Télécharger la présentation

UK Electronics Status and Issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UK Electronics Status and Issues Paul Dauncey Imperial College London Paul Dauncey - UK Electronics

  2. UK approval UK electronics project (finally!) approved in Dec 2002 • Full equipment request, but only for ECAL electronics • Full manpower request for engineering effort from Rutherford Laboratory (RAL) • New engineer (Adam Baird, RAL) has now joined the project • RAL will also do layout and some testing Budgeted to use all money and effort by the end of Mar 2004 RAL people have experience of CMS tracker • Significant knowledge of design of Front End Driver (FED) • Readout board for CMS silicon tracker • Architecture close to proposed CALICE board Will now use FED as a starting point for CALICE Paul Dauncey - UK Electronics

  3. PD CMS Tracker FED 5V 3.3V Run/Halt Config E2PROM Id E2 Prom 1.5V 0V 3.3V Compact Flash 1 5V 3.3V 1.5V 1 Test Connector 1 VME LEDs 4x Prog Delay 1 Dual ADC 12x Opto Rx 1 Power Good VME64x Interface FPGA FPGA Synch & Processing Boundary Scan System ACE Buffer Jumper Matrix -5V ASIC Vref 12x trim dac VME FE 1 PD Array 3 6 4x Prog Delay +12V 12 Dual ADC LEDs +5V Temp Sense Front End FPGA +3.3V FPGA Temp Sense Clock Control Data 2.5V 1.5V +2.5V 0V LEDs 2 +1.5V QDR SSRAM -5.0V spare Over temp LEDs TTS TTCrx TTC DAQ ASIC Readout & Synch Control FLT LEDs EMU FSYNC Spare Process Back End FPGA LEDs Transfer VME Temp Sense 43 85 Clock Control Data 22 Readout 4x Prog Delay 3.3V 1.5V Dual ADC 8 Busy 12x Opto Rx 8 LEDs error FPGA halted Synch & Processing ASIC 12x trim dac Vref FE 8 PD Array 24 4x Prog Delay 5.0 V 48 96 E-Fuse Hot swap DC-DC 3.3 V Dual ADC Front End FPGA FPGA 2.5V Temp Sense 1.5V -5.0V extract Hot swap cycle SW Live extract request SW Paul Dauncey - UK Electronics

  4. FED layout Ideally, keep everything to the right, redo everything to the left • Restricts readout board to same I/O and inter-FPGA paths as FED • No major problems seen so far Paul Dauncey - UK Electronics

  5. Implications of using FED • FED more complicated and hence expensive than previous design • Keep cost within budget by increasing number of cables per board • Previous design had 6 cables (= 6 VFE-PCBs) per board, new design has 16 • Total number of boards for the ECAL drops from 15 to 6 • Cost per board should be around £6k ~ 10k • Save on much of layout and some firmware design • VME FPGA should be very close (if not identical); would like VME interrupts but not (yet) implemented • Back end (BE) FPGA can reuse major parts of FED firmware • Front end (FE) FPGA will need all new firmware • BE FPGA much larger than needed • Use spare logic for trigger handling; no need for separate board • Trigger I/O and distribution via J0/J2 backplane unused pins • Requires adding termination resistors for incoming LVDS, i.e. changing layout of back of board Paul Dauncey - UK Electronics

  6. Implications of using FED (cont) • Space for cable connectors, line drivers/receivers, ADCs, etc. restricted by position of FE FPGA • Need to minimise the number of components here • BE has 21MByte memories for event buffering • With 16 cables, board event size = 166182 = 3.5kBytes/event • 2MBytes stores only around 500 events in each beam burst • May need larger memories for CALICE; i.e. would require changing layout of back of board • 9U front panel so can fit 16 high-density 68-pin SCSI connectors • 38 pins needed; leaves 30 pins = 15 differential lines spare • Connected directly to FE FPGA for use as LVDS • Could use as I/O lines for digital HCAL readout • For more details, see http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/calice/electronics/electronics.html Paul Dauncey - UK Electronics

  7. ECAL assumed electronics schedule 2003 2004 Paul Dauncey - UK Electronics

  8. Issues – CALICE schedule and plans • ECAL prototype test schedule • When and where will prototype tests be done? • ECAL final system schedule • When and where is full readout electronics system needed? • What sets this date and how firm is it? • Will first use be beam, cosmics, calibration tests…? • HCAL schedule • When will analogue and digital options be ready? • Will either or both options use UK readout? • Is a prototype test needed for the analogue? • When and where will prototype test be done for digital? Paul Dauncey - UK Electronics

  9. Issues – VFE-PCB interface • Voltage levels still have some uncertainties • Main problem would be negatively-shifted LVDS • Needed for schematics – before end February • Confirm connector choice • Compatibility with cable and connector needed at VFE-PCB • Needed for schematics – before end February • Pin allocations within connector • In principle, needed for schematics – before end February • If desperate, could wire cables to swap pins later – before end May • Cable specification • Some cables required for VFE-PCB tests • Need to be manufactured – before end May • Prototype board testing with “semi-final” VFE-PCB • Needed before redesign – before end November Paul Dauncey - UK Electronics

  10. Issues – beam test details • Laboratory requirements; cable safety specification, etc. • Needed for cable manufacture – before end May • Define number of events needed per beam spill • Affects size of onboard memory required • Also needs event size estimate per board from HCAL if using UK boards • Needed for schematics – before end February • Cable lengths • Distance between VME crate and ECAL/HCAL • Needed for cable manufacture – before end May • Trigger logic and distribution • Allocation of I/O lines with termination resistors • Needed for assembly– before end May • Number of pins to be allocated on backplane for trigger fanout • Needed for firmware design – before end May Paul Dauncey - UK Electronics

  11. Issues – HCAL plans • Analogue; is VFE-PCB interface compatible? • For signal levels, cables, connectors • Needed for schematics – before end February • Number of boards required for manufacture – before end February 2004 • Digital; interface specification • Sufficient number of spare connector pins? • Needed for schematics – before end February • Digital; allocations of pins • Have to mount termination resistors on correct lines • Needed for assembly – before end April • Digital; firmware development for spare pins • UK unlikely to have manpower required • Needed for digital HCAL tests – before end November Paul Dauncey - UK Electronics

More Related