1 / 25

Sampling (conclusion) & Experimental Research Design

Sampling (conclusion) & Experimental Research Design. Readings: Baxter and Babbie, 2004, Chapters 7 & 9. Issues in Non-probability sampling. Bias? Is the sample representative? Types of sampling problems: Alpha: find a trend in the sample that does not exist in the population

morenob
Télécharger la présentation

Sampling (conclusion) & Experimental Research Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sampling (conclusion) & Experimental Research Design Readings: Baxter and Babbie, 2004, Chapters 7 & 9

  2. Issues in Non-probability sampling • Bias? • Is the sample representative? • Types of sampling problems: • Alpha: find a trend in the sample that does not exist in the population • Beta: do not find a trend in the sample that exists in the population

  3. Principles of Probability Sampling • each member of the population an equal chance of being chosen within specified parameters • Advantages • ideal for statistical purposes • Disadvantages • hard to achieve in practice • requires an accurate list (sampling frame or operational definition) of the whole population • expensive

  4. Types of Probability Sampling • 1. Simple Random Sample • With replacement • Without replacement: link • 2. Systematic Sample (every “n”th person) With Random Start • Urban studies example) • 3. Stratified Sampling: • Sampling Disproportionately and Weighting • 4. Cluster Sampling

  5. Examples of sampling issues & techniques • Survey about football (soccer) market • Rural poverty project and sampling issues

  6. Postpone: Techniques for Assessing Probability Sampling We will discuss these in connection with Chapter 11 material: • Standard deviation • Sampling error • Sampling distribution • Central limit theorem • Confidence intervals (margin of error)

  7. Introduction to Experimental Design • Recall discussion of experiments in lecture on Research Ethics • Milgram experiment (on obedience) • Stanford prison experiment about how prisons as institutions communicate roles and shape actions (still photo from video on right showing research subjects dressed as prison guard & prisoners)

  8. Trends in Experimental Social Research • types of subjects & reporting style (naming vs. anonymity) • deception & risk • debriefing

  9. Single & double Blind Experiments Neuman (2000: 239)

  10. Key Notions / Terms • Treatment, stimulus, manipulation (independent variable) • observable outcome (dependent variable) • Experimental Group • Control group • pretest (measurement before treatment) • posttest (measurement after treatment)

  11. Random Assignment Neuman (2000: 226)

  12. Comparison with Random Sampling Neuman (2000: 226)

  13. How to Randomly Assign Neuman (2000: 227)

  14. Experimental Design Notation • O= observation • X= treatment • R= random assignment

  15. Some Common Types of Design

  16. Three common types of experimental design: Classical pretest-post test – • Total population randomly divided into two samples; • control sample • experimental sample. • Only the experimental sample is exposed to the manipulated variable. • compares pretest results with the post test results for both samples. • divergence between the two samples is assumed to be a result of the experiment.

  17. Solomon four group design – • The population is randomly divided into four samples. • Two of the groups are experimental samples. • Two groups experience no experimental manipulation of variables. • Two groups receive a pretest and a post test. • Two groups receive only a post test. • improvement over the classical design because it controls for the effect of the pretest.

  18. Factorial design – • similar to a classical design except additional samples are used. • Each group is exposed to a different experimental manipulation.

  19. Factorial Design

  20. Validity Issues • internal validity: elimination of plausible alternative explanations • external validity: ability to generalize (outside the experiment)

  21. Internal Validity Threats • selection bias: groups not equivalent • history: unrelated event affects exp. • maturation: separate process causes effects • testing: ex. Pretest effects

  22. More Internal Validity Threats • instrumentation: measure changes • mortality/attrition • statistical regression : ex. Violent films • contamination • compensatory behaviour • experimenter expectancy

  23. External Validity Threats • realism • reactivity: • Hawthorne effect • novelty effect • placebo effect

  24. Laboratory vs. Field experiments • lab.- more control , higher internal validity • field- more natural, higher external validity

  25. Recall : New Ethical Norms • protection of subjects • debates about deception

More Related