html5-img
1 / 14

Access Issues from Three Different Perspectives

Access Issues from Three Different Perspectives. Cheryl Davis Bullock cdbulloc@uiuc.edu D. Michelle Hinn hinn@uiuc.edu University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign International ALN Conference - 98 New York, New York. The Three Perspectives. Hardware/Software Student Learning

morrison
Télécharger la présentation

Access Issues from Three Different Perspectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Access Issues from Three Different Perspectives Cheryl Davis Bullock cdbulloc@uiuc.edu D. Michelle Hinn hinn@uiuc.edu University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign International ALN Conference - 98 New York, New York

  2. The Three Perspectives • Hardware/Software • Student Learning • Students with Disabilities

  3. Background • SCALE Project (Ory, Arvan) • Educational Psychology

  4. SCALE Evaluation • Three year evaluation • 7,000 students • Over 100 student groups • 120 faculty • 7 quasi-experiments • 5 courses monitored

  5. Hardware • Machine Accessibility • Graduate Students

  6. Software • Ease versus Quality • Web-based Software • Training

  7. Student Learning • Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Motivation • Learning Styles

  8. Students with Disabilities • Web-Based Instruction: • Offered Anywhere... • At Any Time... • For Anyone?

  9. Reasonable Accommodations Modifications to course materials or activities that serve to enable a qualified student with a disability to have an equal opportunity to attain the same level of performance as a similarly qualified student without a disability. Required by law in accordance with the following: • Americans with Disabilities Act (1990) • Rehabilitation Act (1973) • Civil Rights Act (1964)

  10. Evaluation Methods • Computer-Facilitated Focus Groups and Individual Interviews • Computer-Based Analysis Tools

  11. Computer-Based Analysis Tools Bobby <http://www.cast.org/bobby> • An analysis of the source code of the individual Web pages in each of the evaluands was conducted using Bobby, a Web-based analysis tool designed to help determine page features that may be inaccessible for person with disabilities. Lynx • A text-mode browser used by many students with disabilities, particularly visual disabilities.

  12. Findings • Layout Issues • Graphics • Multimedia Components

  13. Additional Accessibility Resources Access.Edu <http://lrs.ed.uiuc.edu/access> • Companies • Organizations • Tools, Tutorials, & Web Design Guides

  14. Closing Thoughts “Accessibility does not mean minimal page design, it means thoughtful page design” • WAI, 1998 “True accessibility is ultimately a human endeavor” • CAST, 1998

More Related